Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • So this is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
    • Yup, it isn't a criminal case, it's hard to prove, but take a detailed look at my thread to see how many holes there are in what they have sent me, there is a picture building.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rockinrodders V Cap One inc contractual claim


rockinrodders
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Statements received today from Capital One. total penalties including interest paid on fees is £372 and fees date back to 2001/2002

 

I ran it through the compound contractual interest sheet and total including compound contractual interest comes to £1657

 

I used the rate at which I used to pay on the card which was 29.9%

 

The interest is very high which is why I wanted to make sure that the claim was reasonable. Does this look ok or will a juge laugh at me?!

 

The tricky bit though is that the debt went into default in late 2002 with balance of £507 and after a few weeks of letters from the collector they rang and said if I paid today they would accept £250 in full and final settlement. I did so paid the £250 and heard no more. My credit report shows the default at £507 and shows as satisfied "A partial settlement has been accepted in ful and final settlement"

 

Therefore I saved paying £257 so will they insist on taking this off the amount of the charges or am I ok to claim the full amount seeing as the account was payment was accepted as 'full and final settlement'?

 

Thanks again for the great help of the CAG and its members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got your letter from DCA to say full and final, if not give them a ring and just get them to confirm the details, maybe even get a letter so you have this to use later. In answer to your question about reclaiming all charges, the answer is yes, claim for every one of them. Don't forget as well if they have registered a default against you, make that part of your claim as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

I havent got a letter from the debt collector anymore as it was a few years ago.

 

The data reported by Cap One to equifax confirms that the account was satisfied by a partial payment in full and final settlement.

 

I'll try and track down the debt collection agency and ask them to send a letter to confirm.

 

Are they likely to send me this again or will they try and be difficult?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Just got the measly offer letter from Cap One. £114 against my total claim of nearly £2k

 

The letter said we have refunded the £114 against the outstanding balance which now leaves the balance at £126

 

The account has been closed for 3 years although I did settle it with a partial payment to the debt collection agency which was a full and final settlement.

 

They have reported the account as satisfied and 'a partial payment was received in full and final settlement of the account' to equifax and experian.

 

I'll write back and remind them of this when I reject the nonsense offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep going!

 

They have just offered me £128 against a claim of nearly £3k

 

I'm just drafting my "I don't flipping think so" letter! ;)

2007 Issues ALL RESOLVED

2008 Issues ALL RESOLVED

£4,200 in charges claimed back succesfully from a total of 5 Creditors

2009 Issues ALL RESOLVED

NEXT Directory - No Agreement, No Further Action **WON**

2010 Issues

Court Claim from Black Horse - AOS 22.11.10, CPR 23.11.10

Assisting Daughter with Employment Tribunal for Wrongful Dismissal/Discrimination

 

:) My Head is officially out of the Sand :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know Trucker - but maybe it should be! ;)

2007 Issues ALL RESOLVED

2008 Issues ALL RESOLVED

£4,200 in charges claimed back succesfully from a total of 5 Creditors

2009 Issues ALL RESOLVED

NEXT Directory - No Agreement, No Further Action **WON**

2010 Issues

Court Claim from Black Horse - AOS 22.11.10, CPR 23.11.10

Assisting Daughter with Employment Tribunal for Wrongful Dismissal/Discrimination

 

:) My Head is officially out of the Sand :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

How come you have nearly £1700 in interest? where did you work that out from 300 quid in charges?

 

My claim is for £120 of charges and my contractural is nowhere near half of yours. in fact its about 50 quid at the rate of 18% APR.

 

account was closed a year ago and i'm claiming over about 3 years (time at which i had the account).

 

incidently, they offered me £48 as full and final settlement. Trouble is i want to call them, on the number provided, and discuss (as i'm currently offshore) but all i get is a bloody call centre in india.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chris_D

 

I got the £2k figure by using the Compound contractual interest spreadsheets from Vampyres chambers and I used my rate of 29.9% which is what they charged me for purchases when I had the card (Some people use 34.9% as that is their current rate)

 

All of my charges were from 2001 and 2002 so the interest had been building for a few years.

 

I double checked the calculations using another spreadsheet I found on the site and it added back to the penny, so the numbers look ok.

 

If yours is really low are you sure your using the contractual interest spreadsheet and not the stat interest spreadsheet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the partial settlement that I made on this Cap One account to pay it off thru the debt collector, although they agreed it was a full and final settlement of the account, they now said that the goodwill £20-£12 refund they gave me was offset against the balance of the account as it was partially settled leaving a balance of £113

 

Obviously I wrote back and refused the goodwill payment and also reminded them that the final payment (260 vs actual outstanding balance of £500) was accepted as full and final settlement by them in 2002.

 

As I am claiming Contractual interest, do I need to deduct £240 (unpaid balance) from the total, or do I need to add it as a minus to the contractual spreadsheet or just ignore it?

 

Value of charges and purchase interest was £372 but with contractual it comes to just over £2k now as it dates back to 2001-2

 

If I add the minus figure to my spreadsheet as at the date of the partial settlement it reduces the total by £700 because of the contractual interest.

 

Any help much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also paid a full and final settlement to DCA on my O/Hs account but backed myself up with a letter to that effect from both DCA and Capital One before I started the claim. If I were you I would get in touch with the DCA and ask them to send you out a letter of confirmation saying it was a full and final payment. Just stand firm with Cap One - I'm not sure they should be collecting the £240 towards this balance as it was a full and final settlement so get it in writing from DCA and forward a copy to Cap One.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Doo

 

Ive just read the thread about some guy losing a high court case to claim contractual interest and thus set a precedent.

 

As Ive got to file my N1 on Monday, shall I still continue with the contractual or concede loss and go with Statutory only?

 

The main argument was the reciprication of their ratees etc and that was what the judge ruled against. Some people are talking of slightly different arguments for contractual interest but their not well developed yet, so dont want to waste my time filing (and paying a higher fee) if Im likely to lose.

 

Any thoughts guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

rockinrodders I am claiming contractual but put in my POC statatory interest should the judge not approve contractual. Basically it gives the judge options. My claim is being heard this week and cap1 havent acknowledged it so if you want to hold on a couple of days I will let you know the outcome. Here is a link to my thread with the full poc on it KM_S v Capital One

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks KM_S that is just what I needed.

 

I hope you didnt mind me 'borrowing' a couple of paragraphs from there.

 

Only problem is when I paste onto the N1 template it is too big and scrolls down the page, then when you print it some of it is missing.

 

Do you know if I can continue it on a seperate sheet and attach it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya yes you can attach a seperate sheet just make sure it has your name and account number on and attach it to the claim form. I did and it was processed fine

GE MONEY- Settled 5/06/07

Capital One - Won 15/06/07

**Treat everyone as you would expect to be treated yourself**

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I included the removal of the default as one of the conditions on the POC, I borrowed the wording from KM_S thread, the link is a couple of messages up

 

The default was much more important to me than the money, so I'd negotiate a lower cash refund as long as they wipe the default and all other data off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the S.10 letter to Cap One, Littlewoods and a rental company back in April. Within 7 days the rental company (dialatv) had removed the default no problems, eventually Littlewoods removed one default grudgingly saying they didn't have to but would as a gesture of goodwill as it was due to come off in August anyway. I'm still pursuing them for the second one.

 

Cap One never replied to my S.10 letter, despite me including £1 for a copy of the agreement and default notice. Its well outside their legal timeframe, so I included it in the particulars on my N1

 

The N1 was posted to the local court yesterday, does anybody know approx. how long it takes for them to issue? Do they wait a week for my cheque to clear before issuing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rockinrodders ............

 

I posted my N1 on Friday 25th May .......... The cheque came out of my account on Wednesday 30th ........

 

I went on holiday on 5th June for a week but the court had sent me confirmation and dates for acknowledgement, and date deemed as served. That was waiting for on 12th June.

 

Cap one paid up on 20th June inc 34.9% CCI

Link to post
Share on other sites

They still are paying out with little hassle. Just the wait now.

 

Uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...