Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. You contacted directly with the parcel broker so your best option is to proceed directly against them for breach of contract. I hope you have read enough to understand that you will not be able to rely on the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Do you understand why? Have Parcel to Go giving you a reason for declining reimbursement? Do you have anything in writing from your customer which shows that they did not refuse delivery and which identifies the actual circumstances of the situation?
    • Which Court have you received the claim from?  CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE, NORTHAMPTON Name of the Claimant?  LOWELL PORTFOLIO LTD How many defendant's joint or self?  SELF Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to.  03 MAY 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  THE CLAIM IS FOR THE SUM OF £6000 DUE TO THE DEFENDANT UNDER AN AGREEMENT REGULATED BY THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 FOR A LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC ACCOUNT WITH AN ACCOUNT REFERENCE OF (ACCOUNT NO. 16 DIGITS LONG). THE DEFENDANT FAILED TO MAINTAIN CONTRACTUAL PAYMENTS REQUIRED BY THE AGREEMENT AND A DEFAULT NOTICE WAS SERVED UNDER S.87(1) OF THE CONSUMER ACT 1974 WHICH HAS NOT BEEN COMPLIED WITH. THE DEBT WAS LEGALLY ASSIGNED TO THE CLAIMANT ON (DATE) NOVEEMBER 2016 NOTICE OF WHICH HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE DEFENDANT. THE CLAIM INCLUDES STATUORY INTEREST UNDER S.69 OF THE COUNTY COURTS ACT 1984 AT A RATE OF 8% PER ANNUM FOR THE DATE PF ASSIGNMENT TO THE DATE OF ISSUE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUMBE OF £0.00. THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS THE SUM OF £6000. What is the total value of the claim? £6500 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? YES, NOTICES OF CLAIM.  Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  YES  Did you inform the claimant of your change of address?  NO Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account?  CREDIT CARD When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007?  BEFORE   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post?  I DONT RECALL   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  NO   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.  DEBT PURCHASER.   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? THE FIRST I RECALL WAS A LETTER FROM LOWELL SAYING THEY NOW OWNED THE DEBT.  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?  NOT THAT I RECALL OR BEEN PROVIDED WITH THROUGH CCA REQUESTS.AT LAST REQUEST THEY SAID THEY WERE AWAITING THE DEFAULT NOTICE AND NO ACTION WOULD BE TAKEN UNTIL RESPONDED WHICH TO DATE I'VE NOT HAD OR SEEN.  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  NO, I RECEIEVED LETTERS OF CLAIMS   Why did you cease payments?  I WAS UNDER MEDICAL CARE WHICH CAUSED ME NOT TO WORK. AROUND THAT TIME LOWELL HAD WANTED ME TO INCREASE MY PAYMENTS AS IT WOULD TAKE TOO LONG TO CLEAR THE DEBT. I HAD BEEN PAYING THEM WHAT I WAS PAYING THE BANK. I EXPLAINED MY THEN HEALTH & FINANCIAL POSITION AND THAT I WAS UNABLE TO DO SO. THEY PUT A HOLD ON MY ACCOUNT FOR A FEW MONTHS SO I CANCELLED MY DIRECT DEBIT. I MADE A FULL AND FINAL OFFER WHICH WAS REJECTED. WHEN THEY WANTED PAYMENTS TO RESUME I EXPLAINED I WAS IN A WORSE FINANCIAL POSITION, STILL UNDERTAKING TREATMENT AND NOW UNEMPLOYED SO COULD NOT START PAYMENTS AS THEY WANTED. AFTER SENDING MY FINANCIAL SPREADSHEET THEY KEPT SENDING LETTERS ASKING WHAT I WAS GOING TO DO. I COULDN’T SEE A WAY FORWARD I FELT STREESSED AND UNDER PRESSURE SO WROTE THAT I WOULD NOT BE CORRESPONDING WITH THEM ANYMORE.    What was the date of your last payment? NOVEMBER / DECEMBER 2018   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I COMMUNICATED MY FINANCIAL PROBLEMS WITH THE CREDIT CARD COMPANY, WE MADE A MONTHLY PAYMENT AGREEMENT WHICH WAS KEPT FOR SEVERAL YEARS UNTIL DEBT WAS SOLD.  
    • Perhaps you would care to read this and reflect on your continuing comparison of Israel to Nazi Germany Jugg    ALEX BRUMMER: How grotesque of pro-Palestine protesters to besmirch Auschwitz, the place where my grandparents died WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK As the son of a refugee from the horrors of the Holocaust, I can feel nothing but contempt for the ignorance, gross... My elderly aunt Sussie and cousin Sheindy had been teenagers at Auschwitz and Belsen but survived and are alive to this day. What they will make of the protesters who waved flags, heckled and chanted as Israelis took part in the March Of The Living – the annual walk from Auschwitz to Birkenau – I cannot imagine. The images now circulating of the protesters are indescribably disturbing. They can only bring back memories of those final moments Sheindy shared with my grandparents when my grandmother Fanya squeezed her hand and told her to lie about her age to avoid the gas chambers. Claiming she was older, and could work, meant that Sheindy lived, not died. The outrage perpetrated by Hamas on October 7 has brought back the most terrifying memories for these two women – memories of pillage, mutilation and starvation. The Holocaust, or Shoah to use the Hebrew word, was the deliberate, industrial-scale killing of Jews.  It is bad enough that pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas sympathisers have chosen to steal the language of the Holocaust.  Any comparison between Israel's retaliation and the monstrous genocide of the 1940s is odious and anti-Semitic
    • Thank you JK2054 and BankFodder for your replies. The information requested is as follows:   My wife and I are sole traders supplying bespoke, handmade wedding trays and other items through our website. We do not sell on ebay. We had an order for two trays (invoice value £370) that were shipped on Monday 25th March. We used P2G as the broker and Evri as the shipper. We declared the value but did not take out insurance. As the trays were a present for a wedding on Saturday 30th March we checked the progress of delivery on the Thursday to see that there had been an attempt to deliver on the 27th but the driver failed to deliver as the customer’s gate was shut (customer informs us that the gates are open between 7am-7pm. We contacted the customer who informed us she had been waiting in all week and there had been no attempt of a delivery. Evri allege they attempted to deliver on the 28th & 29th. On the P2G web site on the 4th April at 14.17 it stated that the customer refused delivery. At 14.28 it updated to say there was a problem with the address and at 14.32 updated to say the customer had refused delivery. At 14.35 updated again to say it was being returned. Last entry was on the 7th April that it was being processed at the depot. We never received it. I have had six web chats with P2G between the 4th-30th April. On the 26th April, I had an offer of £20 plus cost of delivery (£6.72) from P2G which I rejected. During this time, I also contacted Evri that resulted in an email from Evri Customer Services (20th April) stating that they had lost the parcel. I replied requesting details of the attempted delivery but received no reply. After emailing Evri again on the 23rd asking again for the information I received a phone call from someone called Haleemah on the 25th who apologised and promised to send an email with a link to submit a claim form. I subsequently received an email with the link which only took me to a page that stated “Page not found”. After informing Evri customer services of the problem (to which no reply was forthcoming) a couple of days later I retried the link but it only took me to the Evri website. I believe that I have a good case against both companies but would appreciate guidance on which path to go down. I have read most of the information on this site, which has been very helpful and much appreciated, particularly the various court transcripts. I appreciate that this process is a marathon and not a sprint and am fully aware that I need to get everything in the correct order before starting on the legal road. I am sure this covers the current position but if further info is needed please let me know.  
    • Everything at small claims revolves around informality and common sense, there are no "special" ways to have to do things. The site manager's WS will be like yours and the one I linked to - just much shorter.  There need to be the introductory hearings about the case, the parties, etc., and the concluding Statement of Truth. In the middle just a couple of paragraphs where they say who they are, how they know you, and about permission being given by the landowner to use the car park. Superb.  I've added another section about the signage to the suggested WS sections three posts above. Yes, it's perfectly possible.  It'd be a good idea to phone the court on the 18th to see if they have paid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA's and Dave against the world !!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4537 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Oh well dave maybe a rite of is not what you wanted but it will stop you having to pay them.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all

 

just sent this to HFO in reply to their please contact us letter

 

HFO services

 

Dear Ms p*****

 

Thank you for your latest letter informing me of the huge savings to be made by contacting you and negotiating a discount on my alleged debt.

 

I have decided to save myself even more money by not paying you at all.

 

I have previously sent you a number of letters explaining my position, of which you seem to have read none. So I will put my final response below.

 

I don’t know how many times I have to say this………

 

I AM NOT PAYING YOUR COMPANY ANY MONEY AT ALL

 

NONE,…… ZILCH,…..NOTHING,….. ZERO,…..ZIP,….. NADA !!!!

 

I cannot believe that it will not sink in

 

Please do not write any more, unless it is to inform me of the court date.

 

Mr D firewalker

Edited by davefirewalker

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been going over my lads bank account charges, which are being chased by crapquest

 

As a student he didnt really handle money very well at all....

 

but in a four month period they added £1800 in charges....??? no wonder he was depressed at the time...grrrrrrr

 

I'm now after them too

 

dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

you back on the warpath again dave lol

the reason i am being stubborn and diggin my heals in with MORGAN STANLEY ,is i honestley beleived that the PPI insurance would clear the debt,i have a leaflet here 4 years old and it says it will clear debts upto 15000 then when they wrote to me in july last year they slipped in only pay 3% well with intrest at 29 % it would nt even pay for toilet paper so that is my main contention with them,liars i cannot stand and to cap it all they added another PPI when i began the claim ? this is not acceptable,i rang them at the time when they started charging the second PPI and they said it was in case i took ill on a different matter,how dumb am i i did not question it at the time,and during the PPI payment33 mths they defaulted me 3/4 times,so they can go to court i think any right minded person would see this as a complete farce and also trully deceptive of them...so i am sticking to my guns and as for the Muppets they keep offering the debt to ive had six different companies and this last one is about as stupid as they can get HFO ,what a nice company they are they keep ringing me now it is down to 3 times a day but i love it when they do i am really enjoying their calls ,so much that i kindly play some fantastic pink floyd for them i am sure they appreciate it cause they keep ringing up for more.

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

just sent this to HFO in reply to their please contact us letter

 

HFO services

 

Dear Ms [EDIT]

 

Thank you for your latest letter informing me of the huge savings to be made by contacting you and negotiating a discount on my alleged debt.

 

I have decided to save myself even more money by not paying you at all.

 

I have previously sent you a number of letters explaining my position, of which you seem to have read none. So I will put my final response below.

 

I don’t know how many times I have to say this………

 

I AM NOT PAYING YOUR COMPANY ANY MONEY AT ALL

 

NONE,…… ZILCH,…..NOTHING,….. ZERO,…..ZIP,….. NADA !!!!

 

I cannot believe that it will not sink in

 

Please do not write any more, unless it is to inform me of the court date.

 

Mr D firewalker

 

 

Say what you mean Dave. Dont waffle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Say what you mean Dave. Dont waffle.

 

I'm sorry....was I being a bit long winded....:)

 

muppets

 

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I have decided to save myself even more money by not paying you at all."

 

Oh Dave ... What a fantastic line.

 

Cheered me up no end ..... been away for some time with illness but picking up the fight again with my creditors very soon.

 

Onwards and Upwards.

 

Chalkitup

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I have decided to save myself even more money by not paying you at all."

 

Oh Dave ... What a fantastic line.

 

Cheered me up no end ..... been away for some time with illness but picking up the fight again with my creditors very soon.

 

Onwards and Upwards.

 

Chalkitup

 

I try..... :)

 

dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

May partner has just gave me a brilliant idea and l thought it was good enought for posting.

 

If they write to you again offering a discount or summing maybe what you should do is search for a online translator and see how may languages you can find that tells them

 

Go away.

I am not paying you.

or any variation of that you wish to use.

 

That should keep them busy for 5 minutes.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May partner has just gave me a brilliant idea and l thought it was good enought for posting.

 

If they write to you again offering a discount or summing maybe what you should do is search for a online translator and see how may languages you can find that tells them

 

Go away.

I am not paying you.

or any variation of that you wish to use.

 

That should keep them busy for 5 minutes.

 

Chrissi

 

 

I somehow dont think they will write again........:)

 

on the other hand they are so stupid, that it might take a few attempts to get through to them.

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

just sent this to HFO in reply to their please contact us letter

 

HFO services

 

Dear XXXX

 

Thank you for your latest letter informing me of the huge savings to be made by contacting you and negotiating a discount on my alleged debt.

 

I have decided to save myself even more money by not paying you at all.

 

I have previously sent you a number of letters explaining my position, of which you seem to have read none. So I will put my final response below.

 

I don’t know how many times I have to say this………

 

I AM NOT PAYING YOUR COMPANY ANY MONEY AT ALL

 

NONE,…… ZILCH,…..NOTHING,….. ZERO,…..ZIP,….. NADA !!!!

 

I cannot believe that it will not sink in

 

Please do not write any more, unless it is to inform me of the court date.

 

Mr D firewalker

 

LOL ;) I think the judge might have a hernia from laughing so much, if he sees that letter;)

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry....was I being a bit long winded....:)

 

muppets

 

 

Dave

Muppets is being to kind. Just a pity the Cagbot wont let us say what we really think of these W (think of what a boat drops to stop it from moving) S

Link to post
Share on other sites

status 8 i.e. default is clearly stated by the cra as meaning the agreement has ended, for me this is causing some confusion, because if the agreement has ended means the agreement has been forceably ended in as much as it is defaulted and the creditor now intends to take some other action, notice of default or not? but the rules on taking that action also require a notice of some kind dont they?

 

sorry I know I have mentioned this before but how can an agreeement be deemed to be 'ended' and then 'ended' again some time later, isnt there some contradiction in the meaning or intention of this default scenario.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

this could be bigger than Wilson itself!!!!!

 

please give a great deal of consideration to the legal arguments and also i urge you to fully research this first before jumping in with both feet

 

Hi

I’ve seen quite a few comments about the Wilson v FCT case but nothing about the other Wilson cases that, to my mind, seem just as relevant to Dave’s case, if not more so.

In the Robertson case:-

Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1088

She was trying it on (sorry – perhaps shouldn’t say that!) in the same way that she was in the previous pawnbrokers case:-

Wilson v Pawnbrokers [2005] EWCA Civ 147

She was trying to say that when she renewed each agreement, because they were unenforceable, that she should get the principal amount back for each renewal of the agreement. The court decided that this wasn’t right (big surprise). However, what is important is that it was held that there was no dispute that she was entitled to keep the principal amount of the loan, have her security returned and to have all the interest paid by her returned. There was no comment on return of payments she made towards the principal amount as she hadn’t made any, she was just paying off the interest.

The issue

15 Mrs Wilson claims that, on its true legal analysis, each renewal was a "novation", involving repayment of the original loan followed by the making of a new agreement for a loan of the same amount, secured by the redeposit of the same item.

 

16 The consequence, according to her argument, can be best seen from an example:

i) Mrs Wilson enters into agreement 1 under which she pawns the watch for £400, and receives a loan of £400.

ii) At the end of the period, she enters into agreement 2 under which the same item is stated to be pawned for the same £400 amount. She pays the interest due on agreement 1. No further money changes hands, but her liability to pay the sum of £400 is treated as a liability under agreement 2.

iii) This process is repeated with agreement 3 replacing agreement 2, and then agreement 4 replacing agreement 3. Again she pays interest due on each agreement, but no money changes hands in respect of principal, her liability being transferred to the new agreement.

17 At the end of this process, because the agreements were unenforceable under the Act, it is not in dispute that she is able to retain the £400 loan, to recover the watch, and to receive back all the interest payments actually made. However, in addition, she claims that she is entitled to payment (in this example) of a further sum of £1200 (£400 x 3), on the footing that, even though no new money changed hands, on a true legal analysis she had paid £400 to discharge each of the agreements. This, she argues, was "an amount received by the creditor… on realisation of the security…" within the meaning of section 106(d) of the Act, and therefore is repayable to her.

The interesting bit here is from p17:-

At the end of this process, because the agreements were unenforceable under the Act, it is not in dispute that she is able to retain the £400 loan, to recover the watch, and to receive back all the interest payments actually made

 

And also here from p3:-

3 Following that decision, the stay on the present proceedings was lifted in November 2003, and the case came for hearing on April 2005 before HH Judge Rose. His judgment in turn was subject to an appeal before Laddie J in June 2005. The combined effect of those decisions was that the agreements were held to be both defective and extortionate. There was no dispute that Mrs Wilson was entitled in principle not only to retain the amount of the loans to her, but also to return of the pawned goods, and to repayment of interest previously paid by her.

I hope that this is of some help.

Regards

Nicklea

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Nick....

 

I was aware of the cases mentioned and have done a LOT of research into this......

 

Just waiting on some last minute developments and some advice then its full steam ahead.........

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave,

 

Sorry if I'm teaching my grandmother to suck eggs. I'd be interested to hear how things go with you. In my case, I'm looking to use this as part of a counterclaim that I'm putting together against Goldfish.

 

Regards

 

nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave,

 

Sorry if I'm teaching my grandmother to suck eggs. I'd be interested to hear how things go with you. In my case, I'm looking to use this as part of a counterclaim that I'm putting together against Goldfish.

 

Regards

 

nick

 

No probs matey...

 

I always keep this thread updated.....as much as i can

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Failure of a Default or Termination Notice to be accurate not only invalidates the Default or Termination Notice (Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd v Swain & Co - [1998] All ER (D) 339) but is an unlawful rescission of contract which would not only prevent the Court enforcing any alleged debt, but give the Claimant a claim for damages. (Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 All ER 119)"

 

Dave, can you explain this part you have included please?

 

Where in Kpohraror does it say that unlawful rescission of contract prevents a court from enforcing an alleged debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Failure of a Default or Termination Notice to be accurate not only invalidates the Default or Termination Notice (Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd v Swain & Co - [1998] All ER (D) 339) but is an unlawful rescission of contract which would not only prevent the Court enforcing any alleged debt, but give the Claimant a claim for damages. (Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 All ER 119)"

 

Dave, can you explain this part you have included please?

 

Where in Kpohraror does it say that unlawful rescission of contract prevents a court from enforcing an alleged debt?

 

Dave originally got this from me and I originally got it from tomterm8.

 

I think there should be a reference to Wilson -v- FCT somewhere in there, which is the way I'm playing it, after "prevent the Court enforcing any alleged debt".

 

Kpohraror is the authority for the counterclaim to the value of £1k in substantial damages, without having to show special damages.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave originally got this from me and I originally got it from tomterm8.

 

I think there should be a reference to Wilson -v- FCT somewhere in there, which is the way I'm playing it, after "prevent the Court enforcing any alleged debt".

 

Kpohraror is the authority for the counterclaim to the value of £1k in substantial damages, without having to show special damages.

 

Ah right, but we need to clarify this. If asked by a judge how this conclusion is reached, we can't just say 'I got it from a mate who got it from another mate' :D

 

I agree that some further reference to Wilson would be appropriate. There is a clear precedent for the £1,000 damages but if the amount owed is substantially more, and the creditor can still enforce it, then the £1,000 is of limited benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ian

 

The debts ARE unenforceable....No prescribed terms at all.....one doesnt even have a creditors name and address. so no problems there...:)

 

 

rgds

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah right, but we need to clarify this. If asked by a judge how this conclusion is reached, we can't just say 'I got it from a mate who got it from another mate' :D

 

I agree that some further reference to Wilson would be appropriate. There is a clear precedent for the £1,000 damages but if the amount owed is substantially more, and the creditor can still enforce it, then the £1,000 is of limited benefit.

 

No, I wouldn't say that neither. ;)

 

I would say "the Creditor hasn't followed the prescribed process under the Act and Regulations and should lose the possibility of further enforcement under the agreement as a financial penalty, in line with the Woodchester and Wilson Judgments".

 

Might be just an opinion, but it has to be pursuasive argument at least. (If not binding!)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking that if a default and then a termination notice is inaccurate and invalid, then we could argue that a further default notice (corrected) cannot be issued as the agreement is no longer in force. This is the creditors own fault as they have acted unlawfully.

 

If they cannot then follow the correct procedure, then they can't take the next step in issuing court proceedings.

 

Just thinking out loud really, is there any merit in this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...