Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Can you complete this ASAP also:    
    • 25/05/2024? That the deadline or the date of the claimform?
    • Banks have different limits above which they require Probate. So it may be Probate is not needed, although as he died with no Will that could complicate things. Is all the £28k with Virgin Money? Your wife should contact all banks who hold his money with the death certificate and ask them what they need to release the funds to her. Most banks have a central "bereavement department". Check their websites. Use that department rather than general call centre or bank branch if they have one. Nearly every bank website has a section on "what to do when a customer dies" so have a search for that. Your wife may also have to provide evidence that she is his daughter. When his wife died it sounds like they had a joint bank account so that's why her money just went across to him. But as it isn't a joint account now transfer to your wife won't be quite that simple.  
    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Taking Cabot to court for failing to supply HSBC CCA + Distress etc


tbern123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5426 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well, I think I'm just going to have to set the cat amongst the pigeons and get Cabot and Barclaycard to fight it out amongst themselves. When I get home from this trip, I'm just going to write to both of them and tell them if anybody wants any cash, they'll have to convince me who owns what. And if they won't play ball, we'll let a judge decide. And I'll drag both of them into court if I have to, to sort this out once and for all.

 

This has gone on way too long.

 

 

Yep - seems these companies can't get to grips with the simple questions being asked of them can they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yep - seems these companies can't get to grips with the simple questions being asked of them can they?

The braincell is probably is use by another DCA so they cannot reply until they have use then they will send another bunch of mailsh*ts out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The braincell is probably is use by another DCA so they cannot reply until they have use then they will send another bunch of mailsh*ts out.

 

 

I think what we are witnessing here is a lot of companies who are in very deep "doo doo" for one reason or another and they really are floundering in trying to worm their way out of their "wrong doings" ?

 

Seems the huge "silence" is speaking volumes to us?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have been so used to getting their own way with their telephone bullying for years and their lies and threatening letters. (I was caught by them a few times) but thanks to the Forum and others like it we the rogue debtors are fighting back and making them earn their money by proving

a. They have located the right person

b. The debt actually exists

c. They have a right to collect it

 

Simple things they fail to grasp

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have been so used to getting their own way with their telephone bullying for years and their lies and threatening letters. (I was caught by them a few times) but thanks to the Forum and others like it we the rogue debtors are fighting back and making them earn their money by proving

a. They have located the right person

b. The debt actually exists

c. They have a right to collect it

 

Simple things they fail to grasp

 

I do have to smile - only last week a company who my hubby had SAR'd suddenly decided to send him a huge questionnaire and wanted "proof of ID" as in bills or Passport etc.. (so funny?)

 

Yet they'd spent years harrassing him and writing rubbish data about him and even sold account onto a DCA etc.. - but sudenly felt the need to check they were dealing with correct person - what a joke? The fact that there is no CCA to this account etc.. is another point that we shouldn't mention to this company cause they tell us "we are right - you are wrong" in their reply that the "application form" is an agreement and they don't need anything else!! OK then - so let's see them show the judge this and we shall soon see who is in the wrong.

 

These companies never thought they'd get found out in a million years? BUT - the good news for us people is - Their game is up now :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't let the weekend go by without sending an email ;-)

 

----- Original Message ----- From: tbern123

To: [email protected]

Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]

Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2007 10:50 PM

Subject: Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd

 

 

 

Mr Dean Spencer

Hodsons Solicitors

Glebe House

2 Clifton Road

Rugby

CV21 3PX

Dear Mr Spencer,

Thank you for both of your letters dated 17th May 2007, I can confirm that these were both received on 19 May 2007. I would also like to thank you for taking the time to respond and for providing me with answers my questions. Sadly, I am confused by the content of your response and I would very much appreciate clarification in relation to the content of your letters. Firstly, I would like to refer you to “Letter One”

'3. Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd has provided all data processed by it. Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd (formerly Kings Hill (No.1) Limited) is the assignee of the debt and as the purchaser of the debt has a duty to report or continue to report to the CRAs

4. Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd does not process any data relating to customers, only Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd does so. The latter is the servicing company for the group.'

I am sure you will fully appreciate my confusion. If Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd, does not process any customer data, how can it as the assignee report anything to the CRAs. As Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd are not the assignee, I trust that they is not reporting or continuing to report to CRAs as no rights have been assigned to them. I am very disappointed with the tactics initiated by Mr Wellinghoff, in relation to cheque 300063. I would have presumed as a qualified professional he would not resort to word games. In his letter of 10th April, Mr Wellinghoff states:

“I would wish to clarify that Cabot has not presented any cheque with reference 300063 for payment on 3 April 2007”

I note that you state in letter one:

Paragraph 6

“This is incorrect. Mr Marsh was informed by Mr Wellinghoff that the cheque was not presented on the date alleged.”

However, Mr Marsh stated in his email (which I can forward to you, if you so wish):

“Apologies for not getting back to you on this point. I have spoken to my contact at Cabot who states that they do not accept the cheque was presented by them.”

I can only assume that there has been a complete breakdown in communication between, Cabot Financial and Kent Trading Standards, however I will revert to Mr Marsh for clarification.

Your letter, has been the first confirmation I have received that cheque 300063 was actually presented for payment by Cabot. I would very much appreciate an explanation as to why this was not previously clarified by Mr Wellinghoff. I have interpreted this as a deliberate attempt to cause delay and confusion.

In letter two, you state:

'Kings Hill (No.1) Ltd changed its name to Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd as you are aware this may account for the apparent confusion in relation to cheque 300063. That cheque was payable to Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd, the cheque was accepted by Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd as the servicing company on behalf of Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd.'

Contrary, to the information provided by your clients I have attached a copy of cheque 300063 to this email. You will note that the cheque was actually payable to Kings Hill (No.1) Ltd, NOT Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd. If you look carefully on the bank of the cheque, you will note that it has been date stamped by Barclays 30th March 2007, it subsequently debited my account on 3rd April 2007.

Furthermore, as a separate Subject Access Request was made at the same time to Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd, I have actually been charged twice, by Cabot for one Subject Access Request.

Taking into consideration that a payment had already been made to Cabot Financial (Europe) Ltd and as Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd claim that they don't process any customer data, cheque 300063 should never have been presented for payment. I am also surprised that a cheque crossed account payee only, payable to Kings Hill (No.1) Ltd (now a dormant company) was presented for payment, maybe you could clarify the name of the account that this cheque was credited too.

In summary:

  1. If Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd does not process customers data, how as the assignee does it report or continue to report to CRAs?


  2. Why did Mr Wellinghoff not clarify that cheque 300063 had in fact been presented for payment by Cabot?
  3. Why have I been charged twice for one Subject Access Request?
  4. What is the name of the account that cheque 300063 was credited too?

For the avoidance of doubt, I have made a number of attempts to resolve this matter, which have either been ignored or not clarified by Cabot. As previously advised, unless I am in receipt of a full refund before Thursday 24th May 2007, I will instigate further litigation. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your time and assistance in regard to this matter

Regards

Mr tbern123

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far Dean Spencer has been the only person, to take this seriously and actually bother to provide me with answers to my questions.

 

I don't understand why WW, did not clarify the situation in relation to chq 300063. The two things I hate most, is when people treat me like an idiot or ignore me. Cabot have done both time and time again,

 

Of course, when I get to court I will inform the judge of this farce and their continued attempts to delay and cause confusion:mad:

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Dean Spencer

Firstly, I would like to refer you to “Letter One”

 

'3. Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd (formerly Kings Hill (No.1) Limited) is the assignee of the debt and as the purchaser of the debt has a duty to report or continue to report to the CRAs

 

 

 

Hi,

 

 

Hold on!!!

 

 

They claim that they only have the rights and no duties!!!:eek:

 

 

Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is getting quite ridiculous. But surely DS should advise Cabot on the vaibility of their court cases? I know a solicitor represents its client but there must be a duty of care to advise when they can see they are skating on thin ice.

Or is Hodsons just a litigation factory the legal equivalent of Bernard Matthews and the Cabot claims are nothing more than turkey twizzlers - seemingly tasty on the outside but just rubbishy pap on the inside?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is getting quite ridiculous. But surely DS should advise Cabot on the vaibility of their court cases? I know a solicitor represents its client but there must be a duty of care to advise when they can see they are skating on thin ice.

Or is Hodsons just a litigation factory the legal equivalent of Bernard Matthews and the Cabot claims are nothing more than turkey twizzlers - seemingly tasty on the outside but just rubbishy pap on the inside?

 

Rhia YES dean does have certain "protocols" to follow regareding these cases/claims and his first duty is "NOT TO WASTE COURTS TIME" regardless of what his clients would like him to do!!!

 

It certainly would be a lttle more professional of him to warn his clients where certain cases/claims ought not to be made on the basis that they are not viable etc.. - but seems these facts are ignored by Dean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick summary of events.

 

So fair I have:

 

1) Forced Cabot to remove a default from my credit file

2) Forced Cabot to remove a search from my credit file

 

And now I am 3 for 3 :D :D :D :D

 

As people will know, Cabot have previously denied cashing my cheque....

 

 

But no more... I received this response from their Solicitors today

 

 

----- Original Message ----- From: email address removed

To: tbern123

Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:04 AM

Subject: Cabot

 

 

 

Morning Mr tbern123,

 

Hope you are well.

 

I have been out the office for 2 days.

 

I spoke to Willem Wellinghoff about the £10 issue.It appears that you have paid this twice therefore a refund of £10 is being sent to you by Cabot.

 

I have to address the other issues you raised and once I have "sorted myself out" from my 2 days out I will then address the outstanding issues.

 

Regards,

Dean Spencer.

 

So that would be

 

tbern123 3 - 0 Cabot

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBern,

 

What if you refuse the £10 and informed the ICO that they're charging twice?

 

They have an option for Unfair Bank Claims when you phone them, which leads you to their site (press 1 for this, press 2 for that etc).

 

ICO is online at www.ico.gsi.gov.uk and have set up an online complaints section in response to the volume of claims they are receiving. You can complete the claim online.

 

What about the people who don't have internet access!!

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBern,

 

What if you refuse the £10 and informed the Information Commissioners Office that they're charging twice?

 

They have an option for Unfair Bank Claims when you phone them, which leads you to their site (press 1 for this, press 2 for that etc).

 

Information Commissioners Office is online at www.ico.gsi.gov.uk and have set up an online complaints section in response to the volume of claims they are receiving. You can complete the claim online.

 

What about the people who don't have internet access!!

 

Tide

Of couse they would owe you 8% interest on the £10

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick summary of events.

 

So fair I have:

 

1) Forced Cabot to remove a default from my credit file

2) Forced Cabot to remove a search from my credit file

 

And now I am 3 for 3 :D :D :D :D

 

As people will know, Cabot have previously denied cashing my cheque....

 

 

But no more... I received this response from their Solicitors today

 

 

----- Original Message ----- From: email address removed

To: tbern123

Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:04 AM

Subject: Cabot

 

 

 

Morning Mr tbern123,

 

Hope you are well.

 

I have been out the office for 2 days.

 

I spoke to Willem Wellinghoff about the £10 issue.It appears that you have paid this twice therefore a refund of £10 is being sent to you by Cabot.

 

I have to address the other issues you raised and once I have "sorted myself out" from my 2 days out I will then address the outstanding issues.

 

Regards,

Dean Spencer.

 

So that would be

 

 

tbern123 3 - 0 Cabot

 

Tbern - well done !!

 

Don't you love it when a plan comes together? :lol: :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I know it is only £10

But it shows that they do make mistakes and don't bother to actually investigate complaints.

 

Mistakes have been made at Cabot Towers

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should ask what compensation they are going to offer as you have spent may hours researching and contacting your bank + the cost to have the copy of the cheque.....at least £99 compensation.

 

Tbern,

 

What has it ACTUALLY cost you in terms of HOURS, research, searching this site, talking to others, writing letters, making telephone calls, receiving letters? I believe you can claim £9.25 as a layman for this, but it needs to be justified.

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...