Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New---after 28 Days - Maybe No Aq!!!!!!!


lateralus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:confused: what envelopes?:confused:

 

crush.. where u bin!!! lol

 

on the forum.. there's coloured envelopes everywhere - where peeps threads start lol

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 902
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

on the forum list - used to just be an open envelope - meaning new post or a closed one - meaning you've already read it - two days ago these mysterious yellow and orange ones showed up. it's very distracting - harder to see if you've read them or not -

at first i thought it was those i'd posted a lot on - but that's not strictly true- maybe you don't post enough c rush to get them because i've posted a lot on some threads. so - you don't have any yellow/orange envelopes - anybody else - maybe someone is trying to tell me something!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I only look in brown envelopes people pass me surreptitiously... unfortunately it’s never cash, bloody bailiffs

As for the £100 fee, they are not going to throw any cases out when they can make £100 by just asking for it. As crusher says these changes are new to everyone, I suspect the local court staff just forgot to ask because it used to be done by Northampton. I think they will probably give you 14 days from when they ask for it.

Don’t forget, at the end of the day in our modern autocratic society the courts are a business too and are responsible to a bean counter somewhere (apologies to all bean counters).

pete

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to those still sane (and freakyleaky as well - lol)

anglianwaterboy has just posted this:

AQ dispensed with, which is great.......but there is a line on the order that says "an allocation fee MAY be payable in this instance. Please conatct the court of transfer for further details".

 

so, asked and answered - ring the local court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

 

The allocation fee is payable even if the allocation takes place without allocation questionnaires. The fee is payable within 14 days after the despatch of the notice of allocation to track (County Courts Fees Order 1999 Schedule 1).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, was getting a little confused, about the £100.00 payment!!!!

 

My case was passed to Walsall on the 17/04/07, and from the posts in the thread I thought I would need send a cheque to the court before 01/05/07 (bearing in mind I have heard nothing as yet from Walsall County Court)!

 

I rang the court and asked! It turns out that Walsall have been instructed to send out AQ with their instructions (each court will differ), mine was sent yesterday, so that gives me till the 14/05/07 to complete, return and send my payment!

 

If in doubt ask, the court clerks/assistants may be fed up with us, but they are never anything but pleasant, its worth it for peace of mind.

 

Regards

 

Lady ;)

Ladymuck x

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the lady, and in case you need it - here's the aq info:

 

 

aq info:

Allocation Questionnaires - A guide to completion

this is your step by step completion guide -and here is:New strategy for Allocation Questionaires

and here is how to use it:

for section g of the n149 (section h on the n150), use the wording in blue on post #3 of new strategy link, and then attach draft order for directions - use wording on post #2 of new strategy link(the bit in blue) making sure to add your name and court claim number to all pages. simple as that. just follow the steps with these two minor additions. the draft order is just asking the judge to order both parties to lay out their wares within 14 days of him ordering it - so it shortens the length of the time to a court date - and as dg/hsbc/all banks don't want to do it - they will pay up by offer or just not file their aq in which case you also win.

 

on, the other front - of this two pronged thing - have you sent dg a breakdown of your charges - it is advisable to do that, as they always ask for one before they offer anything - so it saves a couple of days.

and unless your claim is for under 1500 and wouldn't incur the filing fee of 100, i suggest leaving it until the aq is nearly due before filing it - as dg have been coming in with offers just before the due date in several cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

with apologies to quirky for pinching this from him - i simply think more will see it on this thread -

TO THOSE OF YOU WHO DOUBT WHAT WE HAVE BEEN SAYING - TAKE 3 MINUTES TO READ THIS LINK:

BBC NEWS | Business | Judge attacks 'time-wasting' bank

 

77 CASES!!!!!!!!!

 

ALL YOU TREMBLING SOULS - LOOKING AT POSSIBLE COURT TIME - PLEASE READ IT!!!!!

 

AND TO THAT END I AM WRITING ANOTHER NUDGE SAMPLE WHICH I WILL PUT IN POST 1 SHORTLY.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, HERE'S A ROUGH DRAFT OF ANOTHER NUDGE -

this should be used when the aq is dispensed with and you already nudged at least once.

 

DG Solicitors

12 Calthorpe Road

Edgbaston

Birmingham

B15 1QZ

 

Re: XXXXX - v - HSBC

account no,

claim no and filing date.

 

 

 

I am writing you today in a further effort to ask you to consider my claim. I am most disappointed that you have not even acknowledged my previous correspondence.

 

I have been notified that the Allocation Questionnaire is being dispensed with in this case and that it has been transferred to whatever county court. I have written to you in the past, asking for you to consider my claim and reply to me. I have heard nothing. Were this to come before a judge, it is obvious who is making any and all attempts at resolution.

It is my feeling that you seem to have no intention of defending this claim in court and are simply procrastinating.

 

I am mindful of the vast number of claims with which you are currently dealing. In order to more speedily resolve this matter, I am willing to accept the sum of £xxxx as full and final settlement of this particular claim..(rounded down to nearest pound and including your total claim including aq fee ). (Plus daily rate if applicable and you included it in your claim. Ie. accept the sum of £xxxx plus £x.xx per day from the date I filed the claim until the date it is resolved) I do not agree to waive my rights in respect of any other actions, nor do I agree to a clause of confidentiality.

 

Please find enclosed another copy of my schedule of charges relating to this claim.

 

I hope to hear from you very soon so that a reasonable conclusion to this claim might be achieved. I am sure that the courts would whole heartedly approve of our settling this matter in a timely manner and without their further intervention. I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

a note here peeps - i'm just doing this off the top of my head and with absolutely no legal background - feel free to use some personal details/thoughts in these letters - - it isn't meant to be a template -- use the phrases you've picked up from court letters, other posts, etc.

you can always run it by the forum to see what peeps think if in doubt.

i'd encourage a little freedom of expression so they aren't looking at exactly the same thing all day.

 

 

 

ANY COMMENTS BEFORE I PUT IT ONTO POST 1?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lateralus - Have just read the BBC story (as in post 312). Great news, but I do see one problem with it. The Judge only awarded 5 hours of time for prep work, which is far less than the time actually taken, and far less than most banks have been agreeing to pay for an 'out of Court' settlement. The banks will, presumably, use that as a precedent, so we could well loose out!

I do my best to be helpful, but at the end of the day I'm not a professional - please seek further advice if you're not sure. On the other hand, if I have helped, please click my scales - thanks ;)

 

Current Claims (all for friends!) -

 

Abbey - over £4k - Court claim issued & AQ filed ('Tish vs Abbey'). Alloc'n Hearing 21 Sept - Claim stayed 29/8/07.

Cap One - just under £2k - WON (just over 2k!)('Tish vs Cap One')

Cap One - just under £1000 - WON (just over £1k) Nov 07 (JimmyBoy vs Cap One)

Lloyds TSB - £3.5k - Court claim issued, defence rec'd and AQ filed; Alloc'n hearing 7th Sept Claim stayed 29/8/07! (JimmyBoy vs Lloyds')

MBNA - over £1k for mis-sold PPI - WON - approx £1500(IpswichWitch vs MBNA . . .)

Link to post
Share on other sites

we've never asked for any costs anyway - to me, the point of the story is the 77 cases which were ALL resolved before it got to court.

don't bother with prep charges - they don't apply in small claims - at least we've never bothered with them -

getting the charges repaid is the biggie!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking of sending this as my 3rd nudge letter. Any thoughts?

 

DG Solicitors

12 Calthorpe Road

Edgbaston

Birmingham

B15 1QZ

 

Re: XXXXX - v - HSBC

account no,

claim no and filing date.

 

 

 

I am writing you today in a further effort to ask you to consider my claim. I am most disappointed that you have not even acknowledged my previous correspondence.

 

I have filed my claim on xx/xx/xx. You have defended it at the last possible moment.

I have been notified that the Allocation Questionnaire is being dispensed with in this case and that it has been transferred to Mold County Courtwith the hearing to be held on 20th June. I have written to you twice in the past, asking for you to consider my claim and reply to me. I have heard nothing. Were this to come before a judge, it would be obvious who has made any attempts at resolution.

It is my feeling that you seem to have no intention of defending this claim in court and are simply procrastinating dealing with my claim.

 

 

I am mindful of the vast number of claims with which you are currently dealing. In order to more speedily resolve this matter, I am willing to accept the sum of £xxxx. I am willing to leave out the amount of £0.50 per day from the date I filed filed the claim if you resolve this claim within 14 days of receiving this letter. I do not agree to waive my rights in respect of any other actions, nor do I agree to a clause of confidentiality.

 

Please find enclosed another copy of my schedule of charges relating to this claim.

 

I hope to hear from you very soon so that a reasonable conclusion to this claim might be achieved. I am sure that the courts would whole heartedly approve of our settling this matter in a timely manner and without their further intervention. I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Sincerely,

FreakyleakyImage1.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

A few typos in red below. I would leave out the bits in blue. Additonal bits in green! :D

 

Thinking of sending this as my 3rd nudge letter. Any thoughts?

 

DG Solicitors

12 Calthorpe Road

Edgbaston

Birmingham

B15 1QZ

 

Re: XXXXX - v - HSBC

account no,

claim no and filing date.

 

 

 

I am writing you today in a further effort to ask you to consider my claim. I am most disappointed that you have not even acknowledged my previous correspondence.

 

I have filed my claim on xx/xx/xx. You have defended it at the last possible moment.

I have been notified that the Allocation Questionnaire is being dispensed with in this case and that it has been transferred to Mold County Courtwith the hearing to be held on 20th June. I have written to you twice in the past, asking for you to consider my claim and reply to me. I have heard nothing. Were this to come before a judge, it would be obvious who has made any attempts at resolution.

It is my feeling that you seem to have no intention of defending this claim in court and are simply procrastinating dealing with my claim.

 

 

I am mindful of the vast number of claims with which you are currently dealing. In order to more speedily resolve this matter, I am willing to accept the sum of £xxxx as full and final settlement of this particular claim. I am willing to waive the amount of £0.50 per day from the date I filed filed the claim if you resolve this claim within 14 days of receiving this letter. I do not agree to waive my rights in respect of any other actions, nor do I agree to a clause of confidentiality.

 

Please find enclosed another copy of my schedule of charges relating to this claim.

 

I hope to hear from you very soon so that a reasonable conclusion to this claim might be achieved. I am sure that the courts would whole heartedly approve of our settling this matter in a timely manner and without their further intervention. I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Sincerely,

FreakyleakyImage1.gif

Guide to claiming back your bank charges

 

Most of your questions can be answered by following this link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No.

 

The allocation fee is payable even if the allocation takes place without allocation questionnaires. The fee is payable within 14 days after the despatch of the notice of allocation to track (County Courts Fees Order 1999 Schedule 1).

 

Just phoned Worcester Court, and i quote "if you have already been transferred to your local court, and you have a hearing date, there is no need to pay any fee"

 

Id say, Unless you get asked for £100 AQ fee, you are not expected to pay one.

 

Thank god !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - wonder if anyone can help me ? I received the seemingly standard letter saying that AQ would be dispensed with unless ordered by local court and now have letter from the local court ordering that I file 'fully poarticularised particulars of claim' - do I send the normal particulars as would have been on the AQ or do they have to be more detailed ? Sorry if I seem to have lost the plot - I think I'm beginning to !! Thanks for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...