Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1st Credit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5384 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If they do come up with a CCA and fully comply with your request they may take you to court for a CCJ. The costs would then be added to the debt, but if that happens you must defend it as you can then prove to the court how much you can afford to pay and the payments will be set by the court. If you're on benefits, that would normally be £1.

 

However, the courts are getting increasingly fed up with DCAs doing this as it wastes the courts time, because you've already offered that amouunt and shown why, and it adds to your debt. 1st crud would have to pay the court fees but if the CCJ is granted then they would add them to your debt.

 

IMO the courts should throw these kinds of cases out and make an order at the token payment and tell the DCA off for going for a CCJ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 937
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Many thanks

 

1st crud would have to pay the court fees but if the CCJ is granted then they would add them to your debt.

 

If I am reading this right then I would have to pay more even though I have shown that with the CAB- approved FS that all I can aford is the quid.

 

That seems highly unfair and unjust .

 

because you've already offered that amouunt and shown why, and it adds to your debt.

 

Yes I have several times so why would a court penalise me for being honest about my situation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why you need to defend and get a judge to listen and NOT grant a CCJ given the attempts you've made and can justify. Tell the judge face to face that their CCJ atempt is nothing more than a sneaky underhand way of increasing the alleged debt you tried to pay ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I never!!!!!! I had a letter from 1st Crud this morning. Quote "admin fee returned as account has now been closed with us and returned to OC".

They retuned my PO but I cant cash it. Oh well, it was worth the £1

Frame the letter and the PO. Yet again CAG defeats Worst Credit:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They retuned my PO but I cant cash it.

 

You should hammer them for that one.

 

Nice work nevertheless.

 

 

:lol:

If that's £1 per month, THAT'S what they'll order :wink:

 

As a matter of interest - what actually happens if you cannot afford to pay anything at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had an edited copy of the signed agreement off them now which they want me to confirm and to give my comments about. Its a pretty bad scan but it is the agreement. The letter with it was rather nice. they want my proposals to settle the debt but all I can give is the stated quid. CAB say they will help me again with a latest Fanancial statement etc.

 

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is possible that they do NOT have the original agreement and what they have is a scan from a microfiche. If they intend going to Court they would need the ORIGINAL

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone.

 

I have joined today beacuse i have noticed all the posts about 1st Credit. It seems I am not alone with my dealings of them. I recieved a letter from them stating that they were trying to recover my debt from Powergen of £300 from an old address that i moved out of 4 years ago. I rang them up and spoke to a very rude Indian lady who at first asked me a lot of questions regarding my finanical and perosnal status. When i queried this, she told me she had to ask those questions by law. When i did finally discuss the debt with her, she could not give me the dates or details of the bill and told me if i did not pay the bill today, their solicitors would take legal action and i would end up at county court.

I kept asking to speak to her supervisor to which she would not allow and in the end she said if i faxed over a statement that day from my previous landlord saying i was not a tenant at that time, then they would not take action.

I then got in touch with Powergen, who also said they would need a statement from the landlord. The bill was for April 2004 and i moved out in Feb 2004. I have not received any notification of this debt in the last four years and have no contact with the landlord (who i think is now in NZ)

 

Please could someone advise me. Am i responsible for the debt? I wrote to powergen to say i was no longer living there. They have no record of this. Also, has anyone complained about 1st credit? surely these bully tactics are not legal. If all calls are recorded surely something can be done?

 

Any help in this matter would be much appreciated.

 

Helen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Helen,

 

As utility debt doesn't come under the CCA, I'd be inclined to send them a 'prove it' letter:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

(Your Name) Print do not sign

 

Amend to suit, send recorded, keep copies of everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks babybear, thats a great help and i have sent it off today.

 

Would you also recommend that i send a letter to Powergen as well? I would hate to pay the bill that i am not responsible for! Is it my fault that they dont have the letter to say i was moving out? am i still going to be held accountable as my name is on the bill?

 

Thanks again for any help with this matter

 

Helen

Link to post
Share on other sites

In future DO NOT SPEAK TO THESE PEOPLE ON THE PHONE.

 

You have discovered at first hand their 'highly trained' staff. You are under no LEGAL OBLIGATION to even speak to them let alone give them any information whatsoever.

 

Its up to them to prove you owe the money not up to you to prove you dont.

 

If they were foolish enough to take it to court you could very easily prove you were not living at the address in question on the date they allege.

 

Should any of these oxygen theives have the temerity to phone you again just refuse to speak to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - it could be that they do not have the original aggrement. However I do not really want to get into mentioning the word 'court' at this stage. Funny too that they asked for my comments. How polite. They do ask me to confirm that it holds my signature so that they can, they say, send me a copy of the relevent doc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had problems with this outfit too, very aggressive, threatening all sorts, listed under a seperate thread.

One reason why they love to deal on the phone is so that they can enter lots of nice interesting info you happen to tell them in conversation onto a sophisiticated software system developed by SAS.

 

http://www.sas.com/offices/europe/uk/solutions/customers_successes/1credit.html

 

I read they proudly claim that they were able to double the profits of Connaughts in a year using this sytem:evil:

 

Explains the robot letters, and advisors who never answer anything you ask.You're really dealing with a software sytem:o

And they seem to go for CCJs on low instalment payers as it secures their debt quite nicely for them and it doesn't cost them anything :evil:

 

They've got me down as a timid regular payer with a conscience, but as they've defaulted on my CCCA request will stop paying them. See what their SAS sytem thinks of that:).

Already got them recorded (advisor kindly gave me his name) contacting me while account is in dispute. Waiting to record a few more , then it's off to OFT and TS.:D

Edited by veryweary
url mistake
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have noticed that I am still paying the agree quid a month to the OC who passed this debt off to 1 cred.

 

Can I use this fact? Surely the fact that the OC was at first happy with this arrangment stands for something. I am also quite certain that no one told me that the debt was passed on to the nasties either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...