Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

manager/misconduct investigation - But he's not independent or capable - now Summary Dismissal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I work for a small charity in which I am the only paid employee.  The only other staff on the charity is my boss, everyone else works as a volunteer.  

An issue has been raised regarding something I am alleged to have done.  I went into work Monday morning three weeks ago to be told to go home and not come in until they told me otherwise.  Then I get a letter a few days letter telling me I have been invited to an investigatory meeting about an allegation.

I went to the meeting and got ambushed by my boss.  I was told very little in the letter and in the meeting he threw a number of accusations at me.  

He has now sent me a suspension letter with number of spelling mistakes including the name of the charity spelt wrong.  He is saying I have broken policies and guidelines which don't exist (or at least I've never bee shown or even knew existed).  He is so out of his depth it's shocking, he is literally writing policies as we speak and sending them to me including the Disciplinary Procedure which he wrote a few weeks ago.

I have worked there for less than 2 years so I don't really understand why he hasn't just sacked me if he is that bothered, but I feel he is trying to cover up his own short comings by blaming me.

Do I wait till the hearing and then explain how biased and badly done the investigation is?  The board of trustees are all his mates so I can't imagine I am going to keep my job (not that I want it know) but the accusations are really serious and I don't want this hanging over me.  

  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

what outcome are you looking for?

In the absence of a policy many organisations would use the ACAS guidelines.

However - is there reasonable evidence that you did not do the thing you are suspected of?

Don't obsess over spelling mistakes. That's trivia.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Exactly what were you accused of? have they classed it as either Misconduct or Gross Misconduct?

Have you been Suspended with or without Pay?

Have you wrote to the Employer asking for a Copy of the following?

Policy and Guidelines they are referring to?

Disciplinary & Grievance Policy & Procedure?

(You need copies of the above to ensure they have followed there own Policies/Guidelines/Procedures

link of interest for you:

WWW.ACAS.ORG.UK

How workplace disciplinary and grievance issues should be handled.

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ex staff association rep and debt adviser here. The very capable expert members will give advice which I won't repeat. 

From dealing with this in the past, I found that offloading some of the work helps clients a lot. First port of call, Union Rep if you have one. If not then look at your house insurance and see if it also provides employment dispute assistance. Many do. 

A trusted and able friend may help. The objective is that someone else does the communicating. They are not wrapped up in the issue and will keep to the point when dealing with the employer. 

 

That relieves some stress for you and removes personalities from a resolution. 

 

Good luck 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

there has been an investigation against me at work over the last month.
The investigation has been concluded and I received a Summary Dismissal this afternoon


Problems:
I was told the investigation would lead to a hearing, this has been bypassed and gone straight to dismissal.

In the letter the name of the charity is not the correct name, not even a typo, totally the wrong name.

I was told there was a second meeting going to happen and got asked to agree to a date.

Then i complained about the person running the investigation and a day later no mention of the meeting and I'm sacked.

I want the evidence against me as I believe it is total rubbish, that's why I wanted a hearing.

Can I insist on this?

What do I do about the letter with the wrong company name?

Do I have ground for unfair Dismissal?

I've been there less than two years and they were investigating me, but literally a day after I wrote a formal complaint against the CEO (person doing investigation) including the fact I was writing a report to the charity commission, I get sacked.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to manager is conducting an investigation into my misconduct but he is not independent or capable - now
  • dx100uk changed the title to manager/misconduct investigation - But he's not independent or capable - now Summary Dismissal

threads merged and retitled

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Have they informed you why they have now dismissed you?

When you say you were writing a report to the Charity Commission was this in fact you whistle blowing on said Charity?

If you wish to appeal this decision you must take action urgently to get you appeal into your employer

WWW.ACAS.ORG.UK

Things to consider before appealing a dismissal and what can happen if your appeal is successful or unsuccessful.

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

what outcome are you looking for?

In the absence of a policy many organisations would use the ACAS guidelines.

However - is there reasonable evidence that you did not do the thing you are suspected of?

Don't obsess over spelling mistakes. That's trivia.

 

 

Quote

Exactly what were you accused of? have they classed it as either Misconduct or Gross Misconduct?

Have you been Suspended with or without Pay?

Have you wrote to the Employer asking for a Copy of the following?

Policy and Guidelines they are referring to?

Disciplinary & Grievance Policy & Procedure?

(You need copies of the above to ensure they have followed there own Policies/Guidelines/Procedures

 

It would be helpful to answer all the questions you were previously asked, and did not answer, so that people can actually help you.

There is a hint of possible retaliation in your story, but without the details it's impossible to tell.

Regarding the wrong company name it's anecdotical at best... unless you really want them to send you another dismissal letter with the proper stationary this time, best to focus on the meat of the matter and not the form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry everyone, as you can imagine everything is going crazy and I am having a hard time with it all.

To answer some questions:

I believe I have been made a scapegoat so as to cover over the failings of the charity.  The orginal thing I was accused of would have been gross misconduct, this has not be proven, mainly because it didn't happen.

During the investigation, other stuff was discovered (apparently) and that is now what they are using to justify my dismissal.

The outcome I want now, is compensation for the awful treatment they have put me through and frankly the total joke of an investigation they have run.  

I am still going to the charity commission. 

During this process I was requesting policies and guidelines, which have shown to me that the charity is not being run correctly. 

I sent a letter with all the details to the trustees but they have ignored me and like I said the next day apparently everything was completed and I've been sacked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 20/12/2023 at 07:43, cobradks80 said:

The orginal thing I was accused of would have been gross misconduct, this has not be proven, mainly because it didn't happen.

Doesn't need to be proven. They just need to have a "reasonable belief" that it happened.

On 20/12/2023 at 07:43, cobradks80 said:

During the investigation, other stuff was discovered (apparently) and that is now what they are using to justify my dismissal.

This is exactly what an investigation is for... Factfinding.

However, they are obliged to follow their own policies or ACAS guidelines to do all this. Did they? (You can look it up on ACAS website).

Having said all this, I'm not sure that  much can be done, because I believe you need two years service to have any protection, which you've already alluded to.

On 01/12/2023 at 10:15, cobradks80 said:

I have worked there for less than 2 years so I don't really understand why he hasn't just sacked me if he is that bothered, but I feel he is trying to cover up his own short comings by blaming me.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree: unless you believe your dismissal was due to a protected characteristic - and it sounds like that is not the case - then at this point the best revenge is  to move on, be happy, live well...  do not let this eat you up!

  • Like 2

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...