Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK thank you very much. I will prepare my WS as you advise.  I will indeed be preparing the WS over the weekend. I will also post UKPC's on Wednesday by 2nd class mail. As they have until the 17th to pay the court fee, is it possible they might discontinue at that stage too? Also I wanted to ask, in what form should the site manager's statement come? And the site owner if i can contact them? I will get photos of the signage to share with you also. Thank you.
    • Theres speculation on whether the magazine was Womens Weekly or Boys own 😀   ... probably a classic first edition of boys own - based on it costing $130k :lol  
    • You have five days yet to respect the WS deadline which is next Wednesday.  As others have said,  you can e-mail the court their copy.  That gives you the whole weekend to get the WS prepared.  Personally I'd post UKPC's theirs by 2nd class post (all they are worth) on Wednesday too, the court won't look badly on a short delay from a Litigant-in-Person. Another point.  In your WS you say their signs are rubbish.  That's a great point if their signs really are rubbish.  It's a dreadful point if their signs are fine.  So have you got photos of their signs?
    • You need to start drafting your WS.  I would suggest as sections - Sequence of Events - a brief description of how you came to get the invoice. Permission from Landowner - self-explanatory.  You will have to include this as it is in your defence.  However, be aware that your argument is very weak and indeed harms your case.  A person with no connection to the car park said you could park there - that is no different from saying that someone you met in the local pub said you could park there.  Anyway, get the site manager's WS.  Obviously this weak point could morph into a winner if you could get a WS from the landowner. Prohibition - you have this virtually word for word in the other WS. No locus standi - UKPC are not the landlord, they only administer the car park, they have no right to sue you (however the fact you never asked by CPR to see their contract with the landowner makes this a very weak point too). Double Recovery - again in the other WS.
    • And don't be worrying too much about being a day or two late with your WS. As a litigant in person, you'll be given a little leeway. Take time to post up your WS here  for the team to take a look. It'll give time to get your site manager's statement as an exhibit. Also, I understand you haven't got their WS yet? It could give you time to see theirs first if they send it. Do they have your email address? If so they could play dirty and send it the night before the hearing!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bought Wrong Train Ticket, Thameslink Notice of Intention to prosecute


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, fkofilee said:

Be careful with how you go back to them - I saw on Railforums that some GTR ticket investigations have been going back through a past history.

I certainly wouldn't be surprised, as with electronic ticketing it's so easy to follow. Like a digital thumbprint. If @a.l.h was using a paper ticket they should be OK though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 

 

I have made some changes and cut the letter down to 352 words, appreciate your honest feedback

Many thanks

-------

Dear Govia thameslink Team,

 

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to explain my actions relating to the incident that took place on August 16.

I would like to sincerely apologise to Govia Thameslink and all members of staff for the time and administration costs my actions have caused.

On the day, I boarded the train under the belief I had the correct ticket for my Journey, but to my shock, I only realised I had the wrong ticket when the Inspector checked it. 

My actions are inexcusable and I am extremely regretful for my mistake. Reflecting back on my actions, I feel ashamed, extremely stressed, anxious, and unable to sleep at night.

I’m the sole breadwinner and recently lost my job, my kids and a disabled brother depend on me financially, therefore, if this matter were to escalate further to court, a criminal conviction will certainly compromise my search for employment, impact my future, will be devastating to my family, myself and will further complicate my mental health.

I have always been on the right side of the law and never had any kind of trouble, I guarantee that this will not happen again as I have learned a big lesson; since the event I make sure to check that my ticket cover the whole of my journey prior to boarding a train; I have also purchased a rail card which I plan to use every time I buy a train a ticket.

Whilst my words above do not serve as an excuse, I take full responsibility for my carelessness and fully understand now the impact Fair evasion has on Train companies and how unacceptable it is. 

Furthemore, I am keen to resolve this matter as quickly and smoothly as possible without the need for court action if possible, if you would allow me to pay the outstanding fare and any administrative costs incurred by Govia Thameslink in dealing with this matter.

Once again, I would like to express my holehearted apologies for the inconvenience caused to the staff and assure that it will not happen again.


 

Many thanks for your understanding

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that’s a lot better

Only tweak I’d make is

 

1) change fully understand now to and now fully understand (where the fare evasion bit and hm it costs is - just flows better / easier to read that way imo) 

 

2) assure that to I assure you that (last para)

Also ite FARE evasion not fair evasion

other than that a LOT better than before

Edited by jk2054
  • Like 1

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

also just thinking maybe thank you for your understanding should be replaced with something like

 

”Yours Sincerely 

NAME”

since your asking them to mitigate thanks for your understanding seems more something I’d say after they accept OOC settlement

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done for persevering, you're getting there. I think it was Grotesque who said to run the final version through spellcheck because you still have some misspellings.

See what Grotesque thinks about the length of the letter because I can see a few things that could be a word or two shorter.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with Honeybee and jk2054. A good rule of thumb regarding letters is to keep them to one side of paper where possible; then there's no chance of losing your audience. Re. details (and sorry HB, I know...), I suggest something like this. This omits a lot of things, as I said before, and will not, unfortunately, be as persuasive as it might think (for instance, they might think that the money they lost on their ticket would have been spent on headphones or plane tickets - even though you're unemployed. See what I mean?) Anyway.

Quote

Dear Govia Thameslink Team,

 

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to explain my actions relating to the incident that took place on August 16. On the day, I boarded the train under the belief I had the correct ticket for my journey, but to my shock, I only realised I had the wrong ticket when the Inspector checked it. 

My actions were inexcusable, and I sincerely regret them. I feel ashamed at the trouble my carelessness has caused everyone.

I’m the sole breadwinner in my family and recently lost my job. I seriously fear a criminal conviction would compromise my search for employment and impact my future and that of those who rely on me.

I have always been on the right side of the law and never had any kind of trouble. I can guarantee that this will not happen again as I have learned a big lesson; since the event, I make sure to check that my ticket covers the whole of my journey prior to boarding a train. I have also purchased a rail card which I plan to use and carry with me every time I travel.

Whilst my words above do not serve as an excuse, I take full responsibility for my carelessness and now fully understand the impact fare evasion has on train companies and how unacceptable it is.

I am keen to resolve this matter as quickly and smoothly as possible, hopefully without the need for court action. I would very much like to pay the outstanding fare and I owe any administrative costs Govia Thameslink have incurred because of me.

Please allow me to express my wholehearted apologies and regret for putting you to this trouble, and please pass on my apologies to all staff involved.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning

 

Can I please check, does the 14-day deadline to respond includes weekends? their letter was dated 11/10 so my deadline could either be 25/10 or 02/11

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am indeed hovering! @honeybee13 and her magic eyes! But always - per @fkofilee - assume working days (odd that the letter doesn't specify: if you think about it, it's generally ubiquitous with these sorts of letters, like parking offences? But I don't know about that). If you're going to assume anything, in fact, assume ASAP!

Remember, you're offering to make things cheaper for them by removing the need to prosecute, although don't actually say you're doing them a favour, of course.

Edited by Grotesque
Link to post
Share on other sites

As a rule of thumb, calendar deadlines are more often than not set in multiples of 7

...and business day deadlines in multiples of 5 😏

 

Just need to set your deadlines to 6 days or 19 days to make folks extra confused  🤡

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

any news?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...