Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

F&F secured loan with Elderbridge (old First Plus/Barclays) - coerced debt and selling house


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 182 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK, will try to get back on here later... one point to note is that you've left it too late to serve on the other side. It'll probably be a case of stuffing a copy in the ushers hand and asking for it to be slid under the DJ's nose before you go in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 509
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes, I know. have had the christmas from hell and just couldn't face it till the last few days, got a shock from eversheds with their bill of about 30K! and just panicked me. We will be there early tomorrow anyway and make sure she gets it before the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ooh, that's a hard question to answer simply. The contactual payments went up and up but I only paid reduced amounts from May 2011, 1 year at £600 and then 6 months at 210 and then £500 from then onwards to date.

 

I have had a word with my IFA and he has pointed out that they have not calculated correctly, they should have used the rate of 9.06% as stated on the loan agreement but they have used 9.4% which is the APR (apparentely this is incorrect.)

 

So I am going to state this and also state that they were 3 weeks late in providing a proper statment of account that was ordered by the judge. It makes no sense, they have given two different figures on the same witness statement and I have no idea which is correct, it is basically not in a format that is easily understood I don't think even the judge is going to understand it!!

 

I'm going to be cheeky and askfor the claim to be thrown out or failing that, ask that they remove all interest from the loan and deal with it on a capitol only basis (apparentely this has happened before with a different lender and case)

 

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The arrears just don't seem correct, I noticed in an earlier post that you were paying £900.00 and more from very early on. An overpayment of say £60.00 per month for the first 60 months would reduce the running balance by circa 5k vs the term balance.

 

12 months at £600.00 would show a deficit of circa £3000.00

6 months at £210.00 would show a deficit of £3780.00

 

Without knowing how it controls the arrears (assume a separate pot encumbered with contractual interest?) a simple calculation appears to show that you did not come into arrears until at least Aug/Sept 2012 and possibly later depending on your earlier overpayments.

 

I think if you can convince the judge that on the face of it the calculations are inaccurate she may be persuaded to order the other side to sharpen its pencil and try again.

 

Not sure which case you refer to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mike,

 

Yes, my highest payment went up to around £948!! so that's over £200 a month overpaid! No I don't think the arrears are right but they've not explained their figures at all, which is why I'm having a hard time working it out.

 

I am basically going to do what you say and try to convince the judge that what they have provided is crap! and they are basically taking the mick too! (obviously I will phrase this much more delicately!)

 

I just cannot work out where they have got any of the figures from, it makes no sense and I don't think it's fair that I should just have to take their word for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you mean £100.00 overpayment? There's plenty of calculators on the web, MSE have a useful one... Google mortgage overpayment calculator, type in your details and print a copy off for the judge. Its not for her to get her calculator out so it would seem sensible to provide her with something tangible to focus her attention on.

£100.00 per month over 60 months would result in an 8k difference vs term

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've got all morning to put something cogent together then.

Have a look at the following link, may assist you with understanding why the other side should not be granted relief from sanction http://www.stonechambers.com/news-pages/04.11.13--article--relief-from-sanction-post-jackson---ravi-aswani.asp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though it's late in the day, I really think you should ask the other side to agree to an adjournment under CPR so you can verify the figures and check if the recalculations are correct.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Mike, Will get to bed now and get up early and have a look at that in the morning - thank you for all your advise today :-)

 

Hi Slick, I'm sorry which part of CPR would I use, I'd better google that, (not legally minded!) :-) Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR1.1 again mf http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part01

 

In effect you'd be asking the court to consider an adjournment without sanction (CPR3.9) as the claimants non compliance to the interim order has prejudiced your position and frustrated your attempts to verify its calculations.

 

The judge may get peed off even if the parties agree, and its still a very real possibility that she will dispose of the case tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, can you please let us know what hte outcome was ??

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's bad :-(

 

They got a suspended possession order and I have to pay £903 per month (including the amount to clear the arrears) but the worst part is that they were awarded costs!.

 

I don't know what to do :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MyFamily,

 

Sorry to hear the news but the Suspended Possession might not be too bad a situation as long as you can manage the payments of £903 per month. They are tied to the agreement too so can't start to apply pressure for more money.

 

What costs were awarded?

 

I would start a claim to recover the charges they have added to your account over the years. Once you add interest to it it will probably make a tasty sum. Or if you don't want to go through the court route, you can firstly complain through the FOS.

 

Cheers, BAE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks Blossom, I am not too bothered by the SPO but the costs, I am scared of now. will have to think about what to do.

 

Mike - to be honest I'm not sure, she seemed to just say that the costs we my responsibility, I supposed I will find out when I get the judgement in writing a few days from now.

 

To say I am absolutely gutted is an understatement!! the last letter I had fro Eversheds said the costs were estimated at £10k - £15k so how it got to £30k, I don't know.

Some have said to go bankrupt but I think I will lose my job if I do! :-( I have worked there nearly 20 years and don't know what else I would do!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...