Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
    • I am extremely apprehensive about burning our files.... I do not know why, so it is becoming an endless feedback loop. Scared to pull the trigger to speak in the desire not to mess up my file. 
    • Hi All, So brief outline. I have Natwest CC debt £8k last payment i made was 7th November 2018 Not a penny since. So coming up to the 6 year mark. Can't remember when i took out the  credit card would be a few years before everythign hit the fan. Moved house 2020 - updated NatWest as I still have a current account with them. Then Lowells took over from Moorcroft and were writing to me at my current address. I did get a family member to speak to them 3 years ago regarding the debt explained although it may be in my name I didn't rack it up then went contact again. 29th may received an email from overdales saying they were now managing the debt. I have not had any letter yet which i thought is odd?  Couple of questions 1. Does my family member speaking to lowell restart statute barred clock? 2. Do you think overdales aren't writing to me because they will back door CCJ to old address even though Lowells have contacted me at current address never at previous? ( have no proof though stupidly binned all letters  ) Should I write to them and confirm my address just incase? Does this restart statute barred clock? 3. what do you think best course of action is?   Any help/advice is appreciated I am aware they may ramp up the process now due to 7th December being the 6 year mark.   Many Thanks in advance! The threads on here have been super helpful to read.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

F&F secured loan with Elderbridge (old First Plus/Barclays) - coerced debt and selling house


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 182 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OK, will try to get back on here later... one point to note is that you've left it too late to serve on the other side. It'll probably be a case of stuffing a copy in the ushers hand and asking for it to be slid under the DJ's nose before you go in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 509
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes, I know. have had the christmas from hell and just couldn't face it till the last few days, got a shock from eversheds with their bill of about 30K! and just panicked me. We will be there early tomorrow anyway and make sure she gets it before the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ooh, that's a hard question to answer simply. The contactual payments went up and up but I only paid reduced amounts from May 2011, 1 year at £600 and then 6 months at 210 and then £500 from then onwards to date.

 

I have had a word with my IFA and he has pointed out that they have not calculated correctly, they should have used the rate of 9.06% as stated on the loan agreement but they have used 9.4% which is the APR (apparentely this is incorrect.)

 

So I am going to state this and also state that they were 3 weeks late in providing a proper statment of account that was ordered by the judge. It makes no sense, they have given two different figures on the same witness statement and I have no idea which is correct, it is basically not in a format that is easily understood I don't think even the judge is going to understand it!!

 

I'm going to be cheeky and askfor the claim to be thrown out or failing that, ask that they remove all interest from the loan and deal with it on a capitol only basis (apparentely this has happened before with a different lender and case)

 

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The arrears just don't seem correct, I noticed in an earlier post that you were paying £900.00 and more from very early on. An overpayment of say £60.00 per month for the first 60 months would reduce the running balance by circa 5k vs the term balance.

 

12 months at £600.00 would show a deficit of circa £3000.00

6 months at £210.00 would show a deficit of £3780.00

 

Without knowing how it controls the arrears (assume a separate pot encumbered with contractual interest?) a simple calculation appears to show that you did not come into arrears until at least Aug/Sept 2012 and possibly later depending on your earlier overpayments.

 

I think if you can convince the judge that on the face of it the calculations are inaccurate she may be persuaded to order the other side to sharpen its pencil and try again.

 

Not sure which case you refer to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mike,

 

Yes, my highest payment went up to around £948!! so that's over £200 a month overpaid! No I don't think the arrears are right but they've not explained their figures at all, which is why I'm having a hard time working it out.

 

I am basically going to do what you say and try to convince the judge that what they have provided is crap! and they are basically taking the mick too! (obviously I will phrase this much more delicately!)

 

I just cannot work out where they have got any of the figures from, it makes no sense and I don't think it's fair that I should just have to take their word for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you mean £100.00 overpayment? There's plenty of calculators on the web, MSE have a useful one... Google mortgage overpayment calculator, type in your details and print a copy off for the judge. Its not for her to get her calculator out so it would seem sensible to provide her with something tangible to focus her attention on.

£100.00 per month over 60 months would result in an 8k difference vs term

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've got all morning to put something cogent together then.

Have a look at the following link, may assist you with understanding why the other side should not be granted relief from sanction http://www.stonechambers.com/news-pages/04.11.13--article--relief-from-sanction-post-jackson---ravi-aswani.asp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though it's late in the day, I really think you should ask the other side to agree to an adjournment under CPR so you can verify the figures and check if the recalculations are correct.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Mike, Will get to bed now and get up early and have a look at that in the morning - thank you for all your advise today :-)

 

Hi Slick, I'm sorry which part of CPR would I use, I'd better google that, (not legally minded!) :-) Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR1.1 again mf http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part01

 

In effect you'd be asking the court to consider an adjournment without sanction (CPR3.9) as the claimants non compliance to the interim order has prejudiced your position and frustrated your attempts to verify its calculations.

 

The judge may get peed off even if the parties agree, and its still a very real possibility that she will dispose of the case tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, can you please let us know what hte outcome was ??

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's bad :-(

 

They got a suspended possession order and I have to pay £903 per month (including the amount to clear the arrears) but the worst part is that they were awarded costs!.

 

I don't know what to do :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MyFamily,

 

Sorry to hear the news but the Suspended Possession might not be too bad a situation as long as you can manage the payments of £903 per month. They are tied to the agreement too so can't start to apply pressure for more money.

 

What costs were awarded?

 

I would start a claim to recover the charges they have added to your account over the years. Once you add interest to it it will probably make a tasty sum. Or if you don't want to go through the court route, you can firstly complain through the FOS.

 

Cheers, BAE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks Blossom, I am not too bothered by the SPO but the costs, I am scared of now. will have to think about what to do.

 

Mike - to be honest I'm not sure, she seemed to just say that the costs we my responsibility, I supposed I will find out when I get the judgement in writing a few days from now.

 

To say I am absolutely gutted is an understatement!! the last letter I had fro Eversheds said the costs were estimated at £10k - £15k so how it got to £30k, I don't know.

Some have said to go bankrupt but I think I will lose my job if I do! :-( I have worked there nearly 20 years and don't know what else I would do!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...