Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IDR statutory demand served by process server for UAE debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I left UAE in 2017 and returned to the Uk after being made redundant and unable to pay an eye watering debt I took out.

It’s been a struggle to get a job that stuck.

Idr have pestered me throughout and I always told them I couldn’t afford to pay just yet which is true.

I have now received a SD.

What do I do and how do I respond.

I’m of retirement age and only just paid off the mortgage on the house I own with my wife.

We can’t lose that house!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to IDR statutory demand for UAE debt

you wont lose your house, whatever gave you that idea........

anyone can download that form and send it..doesnt mean its not a fake threat.

IF IF IF they ever progress this to court is a totally diff matter.

you found the right forum here

i see you've not read any threads mind.

 

clickme^^^

and keep reading up on other threads too.

tell us about the debts

and scan up everything to date both in/out to one mass pdf. read upload

we need your full comms history with them in whatever format.

and if you've moved around too.

did they use the guarantee cheques and then racked up the fake interest when they bounced...

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

use my clickme link above

already searched for you.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Around about fifteen years ago 1st Credit was very busy sending out Statutory Demands.

This is potentially serious as you only have a limited time to reply (about eighteen days I think).  If you do not respond before that time has elapsed the creditor can then move to make you bankrupt.  But.....

1st Credit sent their SD's out second class post with no proof of service.  It costs nothing to print out an SD form and send it.

However, the Ministry of Justice took a dim view of 1st Credit using Court documents as a debt collection tactic.  The reason was that if you are serious about  issuing an SD then you would normally be expected to have it served in person.   1st Credit had no intention of paying around £700 per Creditor to start proceedings which, if successful would cost them more in Court fees and result in the Creditors assets being passed to a receiver who would (eventually) share them out at pennies in the pound to ALL creditors.

First ask yourself if this is a serious threat.  How did it arrive?   Was it normal post, recorded delivery, signed for or a personal service?

I ignored all the SD's I got from 1st Credit as I had no assets to protect.  However, you have a house and it is possible the Creditor has researched you and identified you may have assets.

So second, evaluate what the risk is of the Creditor moving to an Application for Bankruptcy.    I question who IDR is and if they actually own the debt, and if they do not then are they in a position to actually progress an Application for Bankruptcy.

I write the above not because I have any specific ideas of what to do next but to give other CAGers some further food for thought.  Having said that I think it important to understand if IDR can start proceedings and if so the SD should be responded to avoid a Court asking the awkward question of why it was not answered when or if the case does come up for a Hearing.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is an excellent link andyorch, much more up to date than my experience.

Looks like the OP needs to respond in some way.

I am no expert but based on your link I would say an S78 is a good start.

I also wonder how an overseas debt can be enforced in a UK Court.  Wouldn't the original agreement be subject to the Laws of the Country in which it operated?

I am following as I am interested in learning more about this stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do issue and they do follow through :-

 

never treat it as a bluff

32 minutes ago, comebackjimmy said:

That is an excellent link andyorch, much more up to date than my experience.

Looks like the OP needs to respond in some way.

I am no expert but based on your link I would say an S78 is a good start.

I also wonder how an overseas debt can be enforced in a UK Court.  Wouldn't the original agreement be subject to the Laws of the Country in which it operated?

I am following as I am interested in learning more about this stuff.

Debt is a debt as far as SDs are concerned they don't need a judgment and they are not enforcing/executing a foreign judgment. In practice, statutory demands are served in respect of foreign unregistered judgment debts on a regular basis. Provided that the requirements set out in section 123 of the IA 1986 and the jurisdictional requirements are met, there is no reason why a creditor cannot proceed in this way as per the above linked topic.

 

 

.

 

 

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, comebackjimmy said:

I question who IDR is and if they actually own the debt, and if they do not then are they in a position to actually progress an Application for Bankruptcy.

IDR never buy these UAE debts.

they act for the original Bank as their client

though i will say that 9/10 when the bank are approached by the debtor, they always appear to know nothing about the SD nor the IDR had even sent one.....i'll let people relate that to your (and others here) 1st credit experience.

anyone can print that form out and sent it...

just remember the court are not involved unless the claimant (not IDR) progresses it to court after 18 or 21 days cant remember

there are lots of UAE IDR SD's threads here MOST turn out to be bluffs and go nowhere , though as @Andyorch points too, there have been some real ones. but again i will say, thats sometimes the fault of the receiver by actually engaging and to put it mildly touting/winding up everyone they can think of to write too.. sometimes its just better to keep quiet as long as the bank know and have been informed by the receiver of the SD their correct and current address.

just musings

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Notalawyer said:

Thanks, I am unable to click the link.

hold and click on the words 'programmable search engine' above^^^

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone. A very important info I missed out. The SD was personally handed to me by someone dressed similarly to law enforcement and recommended I get a lawyer after agreeing to the amount on the SD. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to IDR statutory demand served by process server for UAE debt

right so it was served by a process server

you need to act on it.

WWW.GOV.UK

Use this 'application notice' for all applications to the court about insolvency, except when applying for an administration order, winding-up petition or...

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...