Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

G24 ANPR PCN - appealed - Robin Retail Park, Wigan


Recommended Posts

G24 ANPR PCN - exceeded free parking by 11imns - Appealed - Robin Retail Park, Loire Drive, Wigan, Lancashire WN5 0UH - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group

 

I’ve just received the same rejection letter and wondering what to do.

 

My first PCN was received after 18 days, so out of time for them. I didn’t name the driver and stated they were too late to chase the keeper for payment. Appeal was rejected so unsure what to do now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dadbod, welcome to CAG.

 

You need to start a new thread of your own please and fill in the same questionnaire as blueboy. This thread is for advising him.

 

Once your thread's up and running, we'll have a look at your situation for you. :)

 

Best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I originally received a contractual parking charge notice stating that the driver of the vehicle had overstayed the maximum limit by 30 minutes. Limit was 180 mins and the car was clocked out after 210 mins. 
 

I appealed this initially stating that as the owner I’m not liable for the demand for payment. They also sent the letter after 17 days which is too late to charge the keeper I believe.

 

appeal was obviously rejected but I’m not sure what to do next, if anything.

 

also, just to throw into the mix that I’m moving house in a couple of weeks so I won’t receive any further letters from them.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dadbod,

 

Please fill out the sticky below and upload all the correspondence you've had with the fleecers.

 

Also VERY important... You MUST let them know your new address when you move (to avoid any back door CCJ attempts).

Let them know by letter, keep a copy and remember to get your free proof of posting!

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for starting a new thread. :)

 

You already seem to have done some reading on PPCs but if you read some more on 'default CCJ' on this subforum, you'll see that they can start a court case against you at an old address, you hear nothing about it, they get a CCJ by default and trash your credit file.

 

You could either set up a Royal Mail redirect or possibly let G24 know the new address. I'm not sure if telling them is right at this stage of your dealings but the guys will know.

 

I see Nicky Boy has just posted the sticky I was about to put here, please let us have the information in that.

 

HB

  • Like 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to IssG24 ANPR PCN - appealed -

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture]

(must be received within 14 days from the Incident)

 

Please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement - 27/3/23

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date]  - 6/4/23

 

3 Date received - 13/4/23
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] - N
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? - yes, on entrance and exit to car park
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] - Yes, explaining I wasn’t the driver and therefore didn’t enter into a ‘contract’ with them. Driver hasn’t been named
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] Y

 

They rejected my appeal, see attached
 

7 Who is the parking company? G24 Parking Management Solutions

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Robin Retail Park, Wigan
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. IAS

 

 

G24 Email Appeal Rejection.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to G24 ANPR PCN - appealed - Robin Retail Park, Wigan

we know this place well..

^clickme

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From their appeal rejection...

 

"At the time of the offence the information provided by the DVLA confirmed you as the registered
keeper of the vehicle. Please contact the DVLA and request written confirmation that you are no
longer the registered keeper of this vehicle. The DVLA will provide a letter of confirmation to you.
You must forward this letter to the Disputes Department so that we may look into this further."

 

You said that you told them that you weren't the driver in your appeal...

Did you actually mention something about the keeper in your appeal?

 

Or, is this just the fleecers being thick? (As usual).

 

Also, where's the actual PCN? (Lookinforinfo will be itching to see it).😉

Edited by Nicky Boy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just told them I was the keeper but had no obligation to name the driver. I also mentioned they were late sending their letter out so they had no grounds to persue the keeper

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be best if you scan up everything in/out inc your appeal and the PCN+NTK (bothsides) to one mass PDF please

scan as JPG, redact, merge all to one multipage PDF

use the sites in our upload guide. 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well lets have everything else please...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing in your favour is you have not outed who was driving, they know that from your email, might be useful further down the line.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your theory that because the PCN arrived after 18 days rendering the PCN non PoFA compliant is not quite right. The Law is that a first class  letter is deemed delivered two working days from the date of posting.

Your PCN was dated the 6th April meaning that delivery would be expected  on the  Monday 10 th April  [Saturday and Sunday are not working days ] and so it would have been compliant had it not been Easter Monday. So even though your letter was not received until the 18th April, it was still non compliant by the reason that it was deemed delivered  on Tuesday 11 th April and thus one day late to comply with PoFA.

 

They have this weird notion that the keeper and the driver are the same person which in many cases they are not. But that is why they will continue to write to you because that are now treating you as the driver.  Just ignore them and pointless to appeal to the IAS since they are no more than a kangaroo court and rarely  cancel PCNs. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

What utter buffoons.

Certainly ignore their tripe.

But make sure you keep all their letters with their lies so you can humiliate them later should they be daft enough to try court

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say you"told them" about your change of address...

On the phone or in writing?

If by letter, it would be interesting see what you actually wrote.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was using their online appeal portal and I simply wrote “please note my change of address as follows…”

there was a drop down box where I selected registered keeper

Link to post
Share on other sites

write by royal mail

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Royal nail second class free proof of posting from post office, that's evidence you sent it and they can't dispue it later.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write now 

You don't ever want the agro of a backdoor ccj 

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO!!

 

same as dca owned debts if you've moved.

 

go read backdoor ccj

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...