The judge has awarded the claimant the full amount. Including the £70. They have sent it via mail and said I should get it tomorrow.

Thanks, hard not to be! I called today and they told me that the judge ruled that with the lack of attendance from both claimant and defence. He ordered that I pay the client the fine

Hi, Sorry for the radio silence, I just didn't have it in me to tell you all how moronic I have been all week! I went to the wrong court!!! the first court (Harlesden - the preferred location), not the one that was rescheduled in! I really think I need a break because my brain is fried. Anyways, I feel like I let everyone down! Thank you all for everything! I will be donating regardless! I planned to donate the whole amount to this site.

Thank you all so much! I will add those to WS and let you know what the verdict is as soon as I come out. The hearing is at 3PM

Here it is Register summary Title number NGL835940 Registered owners Jehangir Qamar Malik 179 Ealing Road, Wembley, Middx HA0 4LW Last sold for £400,000 on 14 February 2008

Thank you all! Okay, I didn’t know you can do that. There are 3 or 4 address with the same address on the Land reg site. How can I tell which is the Atlip centre. 197 Ealing road, Wembley, HA0 4LW Shall I pay to view all of them?

I got the bundle on the 31st July . They sent it via email. I was away, I came back 2 days ago. I did get the re-listing letter but it did not have an action attached to it … atleast that’s what I understood. Honestly, I’m so sorry, I know I must be very frustrating but I’m so swamped and my mental health is none existing. I have noticed that they’re not attending, so do I still go even if I havnt served them with my defence? does my defence look good to you?

Assuming that's on the claim form ... I never got one... The only thing I received was an email with the other side's pack a few days ago while I was away. I have looked to see if there are any unopened letters .. there aren't any

The court date was allocated for next year, but was changed... I'm drowning at them moment. I know it's not an excuse.

No, Ah I have not sent my witness statement I'm sorry I didn't come here earlier, totally my fault

This is the defence submitted to money claims.gov.uk Defence I contend that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. I will accordingly set out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that I ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. The claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 4. Paragraph 2 is denied. It is admitted I am the recorded keeper of the vehicle. The Claimant is not in a position to state if I was the driver at the time. 5. Paragraph 3 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge. 6. Not withstanding the above on 09/08/2021, I made a request pursuant to CPR 31.14 for the Claimant to disclose the necessary evidence in support of their claim. To this date the claimant has failed to respond to said request. Do I have to submit another defence or do I just print and take it with me to court?

Apologies Here is my defence so far: [Name] [Address] [City, Postcode] [Date] The County Court [County Court Address] Case No: [Case Number] In the matter of: UK Car Park Management Limited (Claimant) v. [Name] (Defendant) DEFENCE WITNESS STATEMENT I, [Name], of [Address], hereby make this witness statement in response to the claim brought by UK Car Park Management Limited (hereafter referred to as "CPM") against me in relation to the alleged parking charge incident at The Atlip Centre ANPR Ealing Road Alperton Wembley London, on the Contravention Date of 8th July 2019. I confirm that I own multiple cars, and the vehicle registration number (Reg), in question, is not my daily driver. The parking incident occurred at my local gym, which is frequented by my family and friends, and any one of them or their friends could have been the driver on the Contravention Date. I have reached out, however, I cannot definitively identify the driver responsible for the alleged breach of parking terms. Furthermore, I want to bring to the court's attention that I have previously received a parking ticket on my daily driver at the same gym location, which was later cancelled by the manager after providing evidence of my presence at the gym during the stated time. This demonstrates my willingness to address parking-related issues when I am indeed the driver. It is essential to highlight that the address of 197 Atlip Road and the post code HAO 4LW mentioned in the claim do not match. The contract, as described by CPM, appears to be wrongly drawn up and does not represent the actual area they claim to control. The contract provided by CPM does not grant them permission to pursue legal action through the courts. Furthermore, the contract is not in compliance with the BPA Code of Practice 13.1 or 13.3. The signage at Atlip Road explicitly states that there is no grace period for parking. This discrepancy demonstrates that the contract is not consistent with the BPA guidelines. CPM is in breach of contract point 4, as they do not possess planning permission for their ANPR signs. Contract point 8 is also erroneous, as there is no alternative to applying to the DVLA for keeper information. Their claim of having alternative means is unsubstantiated. I challenge the validity of the contract as certain essential details, such as signatures, have been redacted, making it impossible to verify its authenticity. The PCN provided by CPM is non-compliant, which means that the alleged debt cannot be transferred from the driver to the keeper. There is no basis for assuming that the keeper and the driver are the same person. In light of the aforementioned points, I respectfully request that the court considers these issues when making its judgment. I believe that CPM's claim lacks sufficient evidence and is based on a contract that does not hold up to scrutiny. I hereby declare that the facts stated in this witness statement are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. Signed: __________________________ [Name] Date: ___________________________

Hello thank you for reopening this Any last advice… court is tomorrow at 3pm

Thank you for the explanation Yes she didn’t think there were two different tickets and failed to pay. there is no way for her to pay the original PCN now and should just cough up? thanks anyways

Thank you dx, I am the registered keeper, I did not see anything because she took those letters. Okay here is the full story: My sister is a pharmacist, she working fills in for different pharmacies that have shortage. She was working at reading boots for 3 shifts 12,15 and 17th of feb. she got tickets for two of those dates because “she had to drive through the bus only area to get to the boots car park” These tickets would arrive in my name, she'd open the letters and say she got a ticket and she's dealing with it. She mistook the two tickets for one, so she only paid off the one on the 12th of Feb, and thought that's that... So I need PE2 and PE3 forms... do I call the court on Monday to call off this "warrant" and what's the difference between a warrant and CCJ?