Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It is an interesting Final Notice. Firstly because there is usually a reminder Notice before the final Notice. Secondly because it contains some of the wording that should be in the original PCN [aka Notice to keeper]. It could be that the necessary wording in the NTK is missing so they put it in the Reminder Notice to cover their error. If they have it hasn't worked. But the only wat we will know if you post up the back page of the Notice to keeper along with the other details asked for on Post 8 .  If they have got it wrong it means that they are unable to transfer the liability to pay the PCN from the driver to the keeper . I take it that you are the keeper and not the hirer? And do you know how long you are supposed to stay in that car park? In the past I have found Sainsbury's pretty good at cancelling PCNs for their customers. Take both PCNs in to the store and point out if you are a regular customer and that the driver spent a lot of money in their store and see if they could please do something with the ticket for you. if the manager can't help, then come back and we will give you their Head office and write to them. It is the easiest and quickest way to get the ticket cancelled. No point in appealing since that would mean they lose the chance to make any money out of you which is their whole reason for running the car park. If you cannot get Sainsbury to cancel then we rely on ECP getting things wrong so that you don't have to pay  on a technicality or technicalities. For example if the PCN does not comply with the Act and the keeper is not then liable it makes it difficult for ECP to win should it go to court as so many people are legally able to drive your car and Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Which is why we do need to see the questionnaire filled in and the rest of the NTK. Also it would be helpful to get photos of the signs in the car park. Ones that can be read by us, and the sign at the entrance as well as the inside ones especially those that are worded differently. Poor signage is another defence that works well and you will  need a good defence should they decide to go to Court.
    • Thanks for answer ref address/bank. Thought it wise to double-check.   When I reply to them as per post #5, what should my reason for dispute be?   " dispute this debt because..recommended reason as advised from your thread and add the debt purchaser has yet to provide any or all of the required documentation."
    • Alternative is to access the video yourself, upload to YouTube or similar and link back here.  Video will be accessible once you input your details into Wandsworth website: https://parking.wandsworth.gov.uk/pcn  
    • Yeah only £10 so may as well just get it done. When it comes to liaising with the police and bargaining before it hopefully goes to court. How does that happen? Via email? Phone call etc
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

New strategy for Allocation Questionnaires


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5055 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

If you have used the new strategy, was it successful?  

80 Caggers have voted

  1. 1. If you have used the new strategy, was it successful?

    • Yes - the draft was made into an order
    • No - standard/other directions were ordered


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats right, no need to do anything about the bundle untill the court issues directions. This will be a few weeks after the AQ return date.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another more aggressive 'new strategy' which ties in with this one if anyones interested - it requests a strike out on the gounds of abuse of process, or alternatively that the draft directions are ordered.

 

Could be especially useful in claims v Lloyds, Barclays, Natwest, etc. and basically any of the banks who take it to the wire every time. I'm not sure if many judges would go for it or not, but it may be worth a go;

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/78216-important-info-regarding-stays.html#post686509

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wait until the judge oders you. its a waiting game now. depending on the busyness of your court this is usually around 2 weeks.

Neil

 

I WON £530 - See how Here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/65986-neil-lloyds-tsb.html

If i have been helpful, please click my scales (bottom left!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary H

 

Can you help

 

See link to my thread and item 2 is my problem.

 

With respect to your Directions looks like the courts have ignored these and have set a hearing date for my claim against the NR for the 27 april

 

Only comment in bold

 

the court must be informed immediately if the case is settles by agreemnt before the hearing date.

 

But i have this hearing on the 10th but have not been asked to attend is this a internal review only (see comments in my attached thread)

 

sorry for high jacking

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/61255-northern-rock-ask-set.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary,

 

I have posted this on my thread in the Lloyds TSB Forum but feel it may also be appropiate to post here.

 

I really feel I need some good advice now please.

 

I have followed the advice given on here to the letter, I am now at the stage where I have filed my AQ with the court on the 28th March the due date it had to be in by was the 31st March. I followed the new method for filling in the AQ and included the draft directions etc.

 

This morning I receive from the court the following...

 

"DISTRICT jUDGE XXXXXXXX has considered the statements of case and allocation questionnaires filed and allocated the claim to the small claims track.

 

Before the claim is listed for hearing, the judge has ordered that a preliminary hearing should take place because:-

 

Special directions are needed in this claim to prepare for the final hearing which the judge would prefer to explain to you in person.

 

At this hearing the court will consider either:

 

(a) to stay the claim pending the decision in a test claim involving the Defendant, or

 

(b) to give directions for this case to be heard as a test case, and if necesary to allocate the claim to the multi track for that purpose.

 

Not less than 14 days before the preliminary hearing the defendant shall file with the court and serve upon the claimant details in which will determine the issues in this claim. Alternatively, the defendant shall file with the court and serve upon the Claimant draft directions for this case to proceed as a test case.

 

The claimant may make any representations to the court in writing provided these are received by the court and served on the Defendant not less than 5 days before the prliminary hearing. If either party is prepared to abide by the decision of the judge as to the directions to be given, that party is excused from attending the prelininary hearing.

 

The preliminary hearing will take place at 11:00 on the 24th April 2007 at Great Yarmouth Magistrates' Courthouse"

 

 

Can somebody please explain what all this means and what action if any I have to take now ? I have been OK upto now but just need reassuring that all is still well with my claim.

 

Thanks in advance...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary

 

I am right in asuming section d) of the draft order is practically all of the basic court bundle except all the letters of contact with Lloyds?

Neil

 

I WON £530 - See how Here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/65986-neil-lloyds-tsb.html

If i have been helpful, please click my scales (bottom left!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much - its all the legal materials (statutes and cases), I.e. UTCCR's, UCTA, SOGSA, Dunlop v New Garage, etc.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary

 

I am right in asuming section d) of the draft order is practically all of the basic court bundle except all the letters of contact with Lloyds?

 

The 'letters of contact' I am assuming form part of the Statement of Evidence under © which you have referred to as pre-litigation correspondence between the parties.

 

Is this right Gary? So we still have to include these at the Draft Order Stage.

 

The Draft Order is just like the basic Court Bundle but it has been forced forward via this Draft Order. Sorry if I sound a bit daft, but it is a lot of information to absorb and comprehend. I am putting together my Draft Order Pack in preparation. If judge does not ask for it, it can still be used for the Court Bundle stage anyway cos they are pretty much the same by the looks of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there Gary...

Any chance you could have a look at my thread and possibly help me out a bit as have just been refused the new directions that i had asked for in my AQ and am now a little stuck. Thanks.

sezj127 V Barclaycard

Halifax: LBA sent 27/11/2006 £640 owed. N1 filed on 13/12/2006 they have untill 12/01/2007 to acknowledge. Settled 12/01/2007 £929.46

 

Barclaycard: Prelim sent 13/12/2006 £250 owed from May 2004. Remaining statements being sent 04/01/2007.

£120 part payment recieved 09/01/2007.

LBA sent 10/01/2007.

N1 filed 29/01/2007.

AQ filed 19/03/2007.

Letter for offer in full 8/05/2007.

Settled 05/06/2007 £433

 

Halifax C/C: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 17/11/2006.

Prelim sent 29/01/2007 £407 owed.

N1 filed 19/03/2007.

Judgment entered against Halifax 3/05/2007. Settled 25/05/2007 £500

 

Hubby:

HSBC: Prelim sent 27/11/2006,

LBA sent 12/12/2006 £3231 owed.

N1 filed.

Defence filed 14/2/2007.

AQ filed 5/3/2007. Settled 16/03/2007 £4238.15

Black Horse: Prelim sent 13/12/2006 £256 owed. LBA sent 10/01/2007. Settled 24/01/2007 £146.75

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary,

 

I've just got a Chicken Korma from M&S.

On the Packet it says:

Microwave Directions for 650w oven.

Full Power for 3 mins

Stand for 1 min

 

My oven is actually an 850w version, and my Mum says I should give it 2mins at Full power

Stand for 2 mins.

Should I attempt these new directions?

 

Also it says in the ingredients E224 .. any idea what this is ??

 

ONLY JOKING !!:D

 

Just wanted to break your day with a little humour,

And to say what remarkable work you are doing for all these people, who I'm sure all appreciate your help immensly

 

Three cheers for Gary !!

 

:):) :)

All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own, and are offered without any liability. If unsure seek the help of a licensed professional

...just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example !

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Draft Order is just like the basic Court Bundle but it has been forced forward via this Draft Order. Sorry if I sound a bit daft, but it is a lot of information to absorb and comprehend. I am putting together my Draft Order Pack in preparation. If judge does not ask for it, it can still be used for the Court Bundle stage anyway cos they are pretty much the same by the looks of it.

 

Im doing the same Micheyboo. How addictive is this!! I love it, I'm gonna do it for all my family and mates and charge a cheeky commission!! (obviously on top of a CAG donation)

Neil

 

I WON £530 - See how Here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/65986-neil-lloyds-tsb.html

If i have been helpful, please click my scales (bottom left!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'letters of contact' I am assuming form part of the Statement of Evidence under © which you have referred to as pre-litigation correspondence between the parties.

Yes, I would assume so.

Is this right Gary? So we still have to include these at the Draft Order Stage.

Yes, upon the courts directions to submit your evidence.

The Draft Order is just like the basic Court Bundle but it has been forced forward via this Draft Order. Sorry if I sound a bit daft, but it is a lot of information to absorb and comprehend. I am putting together my Draft Order Pack in preparation. If judge does not ask for it, it can still be used for the Court Bundle stage anyway cos they are pretty much the same by the looks of it.

Pretty much - the only real difference is that a statement of evidence is required. Each section of the 'draft order' bundle should also be clearly marked and identified as a response to each clause of the order.

Hi Gary,

 

I've just got a Chicken Korma from M&S.

On the Packet it says:

Microwave Directions for 650w oven.

Full Power for 3 mins

Stand for 1 min

 

My oven is actually an 850w version, and my Mum says I should give it 2mins at Full power

Stand for 2 mins.

Should I attempt these new directions?

 

Also it says in the ingredients E224 .. any idea what this is ??

 

ONLY JOKING !!:D

 

Just wanted to break your day with a little humour,

And to say what remarkable work you are doing for all these people, who I'm sure all appreciate your help immensly

 

Three cheers for Gary !!

 

:) :) :)

PMSL!!!!!!!:D :D

 

Now that, is funny!

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm following the discussion here with considerable interest as I'm sure I will be at this stage in the next few weeks. I have represented myself at a arbitration hearing before a District Judge, but as the defendant was an idiot I won my money claim easily. However the prospect of facing a bank that can afford to employ competant and experienced legal representatives is rather daunting.

 

I have written a reply to a Capital One partial offer (the difference between £12 and what they charged me for Late Payment and Over Limit charges) which I first thought might get them to pay my whole claim (about £2,600). However I am now of the opinion that the best effect might be just that it will show the court that I have tried hard to settle without recourse to court action. I would like someone to look at my letter, but I don't know where to post it as I am a newbie on CAG. I don't want to put anything in my letter that compremises what I can do later in the legal process. Or do I just forget sending a letter and just start court action in a few days as per my LBA?

 

Thanks G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just about to complete my AQ for Barclays using your excellent advice on this thread.I got N150 althpugh claim is only for £2000. As

I see it I complete form as per instructions in template (no problem) I then attach draft of directions and other information statement copied from this site.

I just need confirmation this is right . It was so much easier with A & L - they caved in after getting the N1.

 

Can I amend the amount of the claim at this late stage? I just discovered some charges I can claim I missed off original calculations

Alliance prelim 7th Jan £3270

sod off letter 14th Jan

LBA 19/1/07

N1 taken to local court 6/2/07

Offer recived part amount but already in court

WON! WON!full amount !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D

 

Barclays prelim £1973 7th Jan

No can do letter 14/1/07

LBA 16/1/07'

part offer received and refused 1/2/07

N1 issued 15/2/07

letter received re defence - they have till 22/3/07

Defence received - 25/3/07

AQ received to be back by 11/4/07:-(

 

Lloyds TSB trustcard S.A.R - 12th Jan

claim for £126 prelim 12/2/07

sod off letter recd.

LBA 17/3/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I amend the amount of the claim at this late stage? I just discovered some charges I can claim I missed off original calculations

 

Yes you can but it will cost you a non refundable £35 to do so. The forms are in the template library of this site and it is an N244. I personally think the better way to do it is continue on your current claim with your current Schedule and when you win start another claim for the other amounts. Hope this helps.

Neil

 

I WON £530 - See how Here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/65986-neil-lloyds-tsb.html

If i have been helpful, please click my scales (bottom left!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that.

Alliance prelim 7th Jan £3270

sod off letter 14th Jan

LBA 19/1/07

N1 taken to local court 6/2/07

Offer recived part amount but already in court

WON! WON!full amount !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D

 

Barclays prelim £1973 7th Jan

No can do letter 14/1/07

LBA 16/1/07'

part offer received and refused 1/2/07

N1 issued 15/2/07

letter received re defence - they have till 22/3/07

Defence received - 25/3/07

AQ received to be back by 11/4/07:-(

 

Lloyds TSB trustcard S.A.R - 12th Jan

claim for £126 prelim 12/2/07

sod off letter recd.

LBA 17/3/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have written a reply to a Capital One partial offer (the difference between £12 and what they charged me for Late Payment and Over Limit charges) which I first thought might get them to pay my whole claim (about £2,600). However I am now of the opinion that the best effect might be just that it will show the court that I have tried hard to settle without recourse to court action. I would like someone to look at my letter, but I don't know where to post it as I am a newbie on CAG. I don't want to put anything in my letter that compremises what I can do later in the legal process. Or do I just forget sending a letter and just start court action in a few days as per my LBA?

You should write to refuse their offer as full settlement and make clear its part-payment only.

 

Under normal circumstances, what you propose would be the proper and correct thing to do - exhaust all possibilities of amicable settlement through discussion before litigation. However, these aren't normal circumstances. The banks will not take you seriously untill you file a claim. Any additional attempts at negotiation will just go straight in the same system as all the other complaint letters about charges - I.e they'll delay as long as the banking code terms allow them to and then fob you off with the standard rubbish.

 

Prelim then 14 days, LBA then 14 days, then file a claim. Best way by far;)

I am just about to complete my AQ for Barclays using your excellent advice on this thread.I got N150 althpugh claim is only for £2000. As

I see it I complete form as per instructions in template (no problem) I then attach draft of directions and other information statement copied from this site.

I just need confirmation this is right . It was so much easier with A & L - they caved in after getting the N1.

Sounds good to me!

Can I amend the amount of the claim at this late stage? I just discovered some charges I can claim I missed off original calculations

Not without a formal application on form N244 you can't, no. Under normal circumstances I'd say don't bother and just go back for them at a later date. An exception would be if they were comiung up to 6 years old, or if it was a large amount.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HIP HIP HORRAY

HIP HIP HORRAY

HIP HIP HORRAY

 

AND APLAUSE 4 GARYH

 

jus 1 quick thing abbey took 10 pound out of my girlfriend account without her permission, although she was gna pay them ten pound any way to get her microfiche statements this is wrong, i quess thier on the way but still has not recieved them neither. should she do n e thing about it? http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/abbey-bank/77404-microfiche.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have started my own thread where I have posted the letter I have written.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/79481-callingcard-capital-one.html#post701792

 

I have sued 3 people before and I must admit that all of them didn't treat my claim at all seriously until I started legal action, in one case with a High Court Writ. I find it depressing that banks seem to route a request for a refund of fees to their complaints procedure or just send a template letter which always claims they are sorry I am unhappy, where I take as nonsense and that their charges are fair. If they say £12 is a fair charge they are not taking what the OFT report (OFT842) actually says as their guide.

 

I have given them another 7 days beyond the 14 days I stated in the LBA I sent, that's all they are going to get if there is no offer of the full amount of my claim then I will go at full speed. The advice on the AQ is good, I will probably have to use it.

 

Regards G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a bit concerned about the folowing instruction for court bundle

 

Automated charge notification letter/s. Include a couple of examples. Preferably use ones where charges have been incurred over ridiculously small shortfalls and if possible, include 2 letters notifying of charges incurred on the same day

I dont have any letters as I never kept them. I only have bank statements .

Alliance prelim 7th Jan £3270

sod off letter 14th Jan

LBA 19/1/07

N1 taken to local court 6/2/07

Offer recived part amount but already in court

WON! WON!full amount !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:D

 

Barclays prelim £1973 7th Jan

No can do letter 14/1/07

LBA 16/1/07'

part offer received and refused 1/2/07

N1 issued 15/2/07

letter received re defence - they have till 22/3/07

Defence received - 25/3/07

AQ received to be back by 11/4/07:-(

 

Lloyds TSB trustcard S.A.R - 12th Jan

claim for £126 prelim 12/2/07

sod off letter recd.

LBA 17/3/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...