Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
    • That is so very tempting.   They are doing my annual review as we speak and I'm waiting for their response once I have it I will consider my next steps.    The debt camel website mentioned above is amzing and helping to. Education me alot    
    • Sending you a big hug. I’m sorry your going through this. The letters they send sound aweful, and the waiting game for them to stop. But these guys seem so knowledgable and these letters should stop. Hang in there, and keep in touch. Don’t feel alone 
    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is unlawful, breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Highview ANPR PCN Claimform - Bradfield Road Car Park S6 2BW.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 850 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, TIMTOM said:

Is this ok for my defence?  Do I have to attach the letters I have received since 
December 2018

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [removed - HB]

2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant.

3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 

 

4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.

 

5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 

 

6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.

 

 

Do I need to mention that I no longer own that car. I replaced it on 17 January 2019, but kept my number plate.

 

you dont file exhibits with a defence

No you dont need to add anything about the car

simply copy and paste to defence section of mcol

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as you meet 4pm tomorrow doesn't matter do it now if you wish.

 

then you seriously need to read a good few 10's of PCN claimform threads here on CAg to get upto speed - so you know what is to come - how to react as the differing stages of the claim progress. 

 

but you never do anything without checking here FIRST!

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.  Am I just looking at general private parking threads or specific to Bradfield Road Sheffield?  What is the best way to view these?

 

 

Hi I have copied and pasted my defence on the MCOL site.  Just a couple of questions - do I click "No"   to Do you want to issue a counterclaim?   Also, do I fill in my phone no. and email address on the "My Defence -  Service Details " page? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no counterclaim

give all your details

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have copied and pasted my defence on the MCOL site.  Just a couple of questions - do I click "No"   to Do you want to issue a counterclaim?   Also, do I fill in my phone no. and email address on the "My Defence -  Service Details " page? 

Thank you. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please stop sending emails to the private email address given for pers info only now

post any updates directly to this thread now 

 

ie what you have just sent regarding planning permission. timtom.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the reply I received from my local Council when I requested confirmation that HIGHVIEW PARKING had received planning permission for erecting poles, signs and cameras.

 

”Hi

 

There is no record of planning permission having been submitted. They may not however require permission as certain structures can be erected under the general permitted development order.

 

Regards

Edited by dx100uk
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Notice to Keeper that they sent you a few days after you parked in Bradfield Road car park is not PoFA compliant.

 

Very strange that there is absolutely no mention that you would be liable as the keeper if the driver did not pay the PCN within the 28 day limit. That means that you must be careful not to reveal who was driving and they are now going to have an uphill struggle since they have to prove that you were the driver on that day.

 

Given that anyone with their own car insurance can drive your car plus you may have named drivers on your policy and the fact that Court do not assume that the driver and the keeper are the same person , Highview have their work cut out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is good news for you. They cannot take you to Court as the keeper since they have lost that facility now. They can still pursue you as the driver but now very difficult for them to prove you were the driver as there are so many combinations of drivers it could be and the Court will not allow the robbers to assume that the keeper is the driver .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi again.

 

I have now received 'Notice of Proposed Allocation to the Small Claims Track'

 

A questionnaire is attached with the first section 
"A" Settlement/Mediation - suggesting each party negotiate a settlement rather than taking the case to Court.

 

"A1" - Do you agree to this case being referred to the Small Claims Mediation Service?     YES / NO

 

"B"  -  Contact Details:

 

"C" -  Track.

"C1" - Do you agree that the small claims track is the appropriate track for this case?    YES / NO

If no, say why not and state the track to which you believe it should be allocated.

 

"D" - Hearing venue

"D1"  At which County Court hearing centre would you prefer the small claims hearing to take place and why?

"D2"  -  Expert Evidence - Are you asking for the court's permission to use the written evidence of an expert?     YES / NO

"D3" -  Witnesses - How man witnesses, including yourself, will give evidence on your behalf at the hearing? .............

"D4" - Hearing -  Are there any days within the next 6 months when you, an expert or a witness will not be able to attend court for the hearing?

(box to fill in with dates not available).

"Will you be using an interpreter at the hearing either for yourself or a witness?   Yes / No

"Signature" .................................

 

Most of the details requested are self explanatory but I thought I would ask your advice regarding whether Mediation or Small Claims Track should be selected.  There are no witnesses as I don't know who was actually driving on this particular day.  

 

Your advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

 

 


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

should be reading up timtom as advised so you know what to do and whats next

please try and self help!! all PCN claimform threads have the info of this and going forward...

 


https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track-correct-at-sept-2016/#comment-5088148

3 copies

NO to mediation 

1 wit you

the rest is obv

1 to the court

1 to sols (omit phone/sig/email)

1 for your file

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dx.  I thought you had said don't complete anything without asking on this forum first.

  I have tried to view directions questionnaires on the link you posted and on other links over the last few weeks  but they seem to be locked as no one has commented recently, or the ones that aren't are for mediation.   

 

You said omit signature - The last box states:  You must sign this form.     Should I sign or not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not on sols copy

 

if you search

pcn+claimform

in our search of the top red banner, most if not all have the same n180 instructions. 

 

Yes of course always check, which is how we pickup silly mistakes..as i pointed out in pcn claims you'll see you never agree to mediation and not sure where you got the no witness from either??  Not on cag i hope! Its says INCLUDING yourself..so its 1..you!

 

its small claims and always is..

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are not a pain...couldn't careless ...but you might eventually find yourself in front of a judge possibly asking you questions..now is the time to get into the habit of understanding things, why you are doing xyz and why you will do and state other things in the future as the claim progresses, better to wise up now rather than 10mins before a judge time..... 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting worried now!

 

Forgot to mention  I never received any of the documentation I requested from Highview.  I sent the request recorded delivery.

 

I was feeling quite positive that I wouldn't be going to Court when I read the following comments in  November

 

"The Notice to Keeper that they sent you a few days after you parked in Bradfield Road car park is not PoFA compliant.

 

Very strange that there is absolutely no mention that you would be liable as the keeper if the driver did not pay the PCN within the 28 day limit. That means that you must be careful not to reveal who was driving and they are now going to have an uphill struggle since they have to prove that you were the driver on that day.

 

Given that anyone with their own car insurance can drive your car plus you may have named drivers on your policy and the fact that Court do not assume that the driver and the keeper are the same person , Highview have their work cut out."

 

"That is good news for you. They cannot take you to Court as the keeper since they have lost that facility now. They can still pursue you as the driver but now very difficult for them to prove you were the driver as there are so many combinations of drivers it could be and the Court will not allow the robbers to assume that the keeper is the driver" .

Link to post
Share on other sites

yet again, this shows us that you've done ZERO reading up on PCN claimform threads here.

 

cause if you had, you'd know that they don't HAVe to disclose ANYTHING until the witness statement stage, when if they fail to there, they'll lose the case.

 

:wave:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe me, I have really tried to read up on the PCN claimform threads.  I click on "Motoring on the red bar, then Private Land Parking Enforcement and then  I am reading the threads.  I haven't seen any so far that relate to an actual court case.  Where am I going wrong?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...