Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lost parcel with Parcel2go/Evri - Court Claim issued against P2G .***Settled in full***


mwqs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 928 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Have found this forum a useful source of advice so want to share my own pending journey - engaging fully throughout of course :)

 

On 22/8/2021, I paid Parcel2Go, using InPost (Hermes), to ship a £39 laptop which they have lost. Whilst a small amount - they should be providing their paid for services properly and thus I am taking this to small claims.

 

The letter before claim is attached - they now have 14 days to get back to me.

 

The address is: 

Parcel2Go

The Cube

Coe Street

Bolton

BL3 6BU

 

The email address is: [email protected] and [email protected]Letter before claim forum version.pdf

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks good.

Obviously do the reading of the stories on this sub- forum.

Keep us informed and let us know if you have any queries

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They have responded to the previously attached letter before claim on the 27th September. Their response is attached.

As I issued the letter before claim on the 18th September, 14 days will elapse on the 2nd October - tomorrow.

 

I will file the proceedings online tomorrow at Gov.uk money claims. Following the particulars of claim in this thread, I have attached my draft particulars of claim.

10-01 Response to letter before claim forum version.pdf 10-02 Particulars of claim draft forum version.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of claim are fine – although it should be "is unfair" – not "are unfair".

You are now going to see P2G and Hermes at their worst – simply to resist the claim for 39 quid they will exploit the scarcely sourced taxpayer funded County Court system simply in order to raise obstacles and even though they won't dissuade you, they will dissuade many others.

This is part of their business plan. Once they do not pay the going rate for the County Court service even though they are a well funded and large business, they will make sure that the taxpayer helps them to resist the legitimate claims of bone fide consumers.

And to add to that, when they eventually pay out, they will set the amount of money that they pay out against tax so a portion of that will also be borne by taxpayers.

This is what P2G, Hermes and the others do and this is one of the reasons why they are really quite disreputable. However they're not the only ones playing the same game.

 

And just to make it clear to anybody who visits this thread, the value of the claim here is £39.



Yes, you heard that right


£39

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you BankFodder for the correction. Yes, it's ridiculous that they make customers go through this experience for the sake of such little money.

The claim has been submitted - I will of course update with their response.

Edited by mwqs
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not ridiculous in the sense that it's not some accident.

It is scandalous because they are quite deliberately using a cost free (to them) resource to deter other customers from claiming for their lost or damaged items. I'm quite sure that there bean counters have calculated that by forcing a number of claims to go to court and then eventually settled at mediation, this is sufficient to put off the vast majority of potential claimants so that in the end it all amounts to a win for them whatever happens.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • AndyOrch changed the title to Lost parcel with InPost (Hermes) via Parcel2Go (P2G).***Settled in full***

Well done topic  title updated.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lost parcel with Parcel2go/Evri - Court Claim issued against P2G .***Settled in full***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...