Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Athena ANPR PCN - exceeded free parking by 21 mins - Lidl Eltham ***CANCELLED BY LIDL***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1312 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Fined for exceeding the free parking period.

 

I can’t found the form the other posters have filled out with details of fine etc but it happened on the 3rd September issue date 7th September. I received the fine on the 16th September but this is delayed, I imagine, due to my car being a car hire so was alerted to it my.

 

 Shopped at Lidl, have proof of shopping with my Apple Pay but not a physical receipt.

 

 Looking back with Google maps there are signs saying customer parking but no obvious terms.

 

Having read some posts on here, I have written to the CEO, included proof of shopping etc and am waiting for their reply.

 

 Feeling hopeful but also anxious I will end up having to deal with Athena and they seem like hideous people to deal with.

 

 Any advice greatfully received.

 

 Attached fine 

 

Email I sent to CEO (havehad no confirmation that they have received the email) [email protected] (hope this is the current ceo)CCF88FB3-D3EA-4E42-BC04-2DCD9EFCCC5B.thumb.png.b82de17fbe347ad76343c26e91bad162.png

below.

 

 

Dear Christian,

 
I hope this finds you healthy and well in this unprecedented time.
 
I have recently moved to SE9 from NW3 and having been a religious online grocery shopper, spending large amounts with Ocado, please see attached document.
Since moving to SE9, having recently bought a car, the current financial climate & having more options for our grocery shopping, we decided to start shopping at Lidl in Eltham having heard good things. 
We have gone in there a few times now and, so far, we are pleased with the produce we come home with & the customer service experience. Also this branch has a lot of house hold goods, clothing, gardening and recently DIY equipment, lots to look through.
 
Our visit on the 3rd September, we must have taken longer than we realised. We were there with friends and they were doing a big shop, us not so big this time and afterwards we even signed up for Lidl Plus, please see attached document, so we were really pleased.
 
Today I was shocked to receive a, very un, Civil Parking Charge Notice for being in the car park 21 minutes over the the 90 minute free parking, please see notices attached below. We had no idea this free parking restriction even existed and there centrally wasn’t any adequate signage to alert us in our arrival.
 
Please find proof of our purchase attached, please note the time of the purchase 16.38 and the notice states we departed the car park at 16.42.
 
We trust that this will be addressed, so that your customers can park, at least, knowing what the parking terms are before they choose to park and shop in your store.
 
As valued & loyal customers this is unfair and we kindly ask that you tell Athena to cancel this charge.
 
Thank you for your time in addressing this matter.

 

05105140-4EC0-4886-81D6-08FF45A27CD1.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

Have you had a reply from the CEO so far?

 

I'll post the forum sticky below. Please don't do anything else until the forum regulars can get here to advise you, especially don't appeal to Athena. You've had what we call a speculative invoice, Athena don't have the power to fine you.

 

The guys should be along later. :)

 

HB

 

 

PS You need to edit your car reg out of the Athena PCN, to keep this anonymous.

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you!!! I will attempt to edit reg now.

 

 No reply so far, it’s been one business day since I sent it.

 

Not sure how to delete the already uploaded attachment, any clues greatfully received. TIA

 

I managed to delete from the attachments on my account but it is still showing on the post.

 

i tried to upload the edited photo (Same Format as the ones I already uploaded & ours saying it’s the wrong format.


 

TIA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some googling confirms that this is indeed the current CEO.  Thanks for posting the address, it will be very useful for others in a similar position.  Pestering the CEO is definitely the right strategy  :yo:

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long is the stated parking? Under three hours??

 

Can you go back and photograph the entrance and any signage in the car park?

 

 

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I doubt they have permission to alter the parking time limit to 90 minutes, have a look on the local authorities website and see if they have planning permission to alter the timings, and check if they also have PP to erect signs.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please copy and paste the ANPR Q&A section of the link in post 2 above back to a new msg box here and answer each question at it's end before hitting reply.

 

the original planning permission granted by the council will never be 90mins, typically the time will be 2 or even 3hrs free parking

and no-one bar the council can very that.

 

any private parking company needs explicit planning permission from the council to put up signs, ANPR camera and the poles both are on.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] 

(must be received within 14 days from the Incident)

 

please answer the following questions.

 

1 Date of the infringement 03-09-2020
 

 

2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 


 

[scan up BOTHSIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide]

 

3 Date received 16-09-2020
 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No
 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes
 

6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Not yet. Have written email to CEO of Lidl 
 

Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up No
 

7 Who is the parking company? Athena ANPR Ltd

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Lidl Eltham
 

For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Independent appeals Service IAS
 

Not sure what an NTK is, nothing activated to this on time notice.

 

*Abbreviated not activated 🤦‍♀️

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Athena ANPR PCN - exceeded free parking by 21 mins - Lidl Eltham

so get on with your letter to lidl CEO and sit on your hands now until/unless you get a letter of claim.

 

if you go by there again

then please do get clear photo's of all the signs

where they are

and the small print on them.

 

might pay you to also check planning permission as previously advised in preparation should things escalate

 

just remember, this is not a FINE .

but a speculative invoice because the driver supposedly broke some imaginary contract they signed upto by entering upon private land the PPC might or might not have a valid contract with the land OWNER to enforce parking.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 18/09/2020 at 16:17, honeybee13 said:

Thank you for the information. I certainly wouldn't be doing what they say in your post #7,  you could give them ammunition against you.

 

This sticky has abbreviations that we use on this forum.

 

 

HB

Thank you!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from Lidl, as I was taking photos numerous fellow Lidl shoppers came up to me saying they had had tickets too.

 

One said the staff had said it wasn’t being fully implemented and not to worry and then a week later she got a ticket for being 10 mins over the 90 mins And on the scanning machine it said you do not need your registration on the screen in shop, stating “maximum limit still applies”  but it with no mention of how long that is 🤦‍♀️

 

 anyway....... attached are the photos of my findings

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

done for you try now

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - Still no reply, have sent the same email to the disputes resolutions department at Lidl yesterday too

 

Can't seem to compress the file small enough to be able to post it, still trying, will of course keep you all posted.

 

 

Your support is really empowering, it was so tempting just to pay it, if it wasn't for the current finances I probably would have - Thank you!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received this reply from Lidl on behalf of the CEO

 

"Re: Your Contact

Thank you for taking the time to contact our CEO. I have been asked to reply on his behalf.


I was sorry to learn that you received a parking charge. I appreciate this may have been frustrating for you.

In order to ensure that sufficient parking spaces are available at all times to our customers, Lidl employs third party contractors to monitor and control our car parks. So far, this service has proved reliable and effective in reducing car park abuse and in freeing up spaces for our customers. On this occasion only I would like to appeal the charge on your behalf. To enable me to assist I kindly request the following information:

· The parking charge notice number
· The vehicle registration number

Please reply directly to this email (without deleting the subject line):


I look forward to hearing from you."

 

 

Good news, on first letter too!!

 

Edited by ennis
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is certainly progress, well done.

 

The person who replied seems confused though with talk of "appealing on your behalf".  You don't want an appeal, you want Lidl to have it cancelled.  Lidl employ Athena and are completely capable of calling their dogs off.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It did take few days for their reply. Hopefully u will be in luck soon, Ennis. Good luck to u. 

I haven't received any reply to my mail where I refused to pay. I guess they r dealing with too many people complaining about PCN received. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites


next update.

 

 

Re: Your Contact

Thank you for your response.

In light of your comments, on this occasion only, I have requested that the parking charge is cancelled. Athena will confirm the cancellation in writing in due course.

Thank you again for contacting us.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • FTMDave changed the title to Athena ANPR PCN - exceeded free parking by 21 mins - Lidl Eltham ***CANCELLED BY LIDL***

well done

 

please try and donate to keep us here.

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...