Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
    • thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OPS CCTV PCN - Fabrick Apartments, Cheadle Hulme, Stockport - already refused Appeal - parked in visitor bay whilst viewing an Apartment. **CANC'd by :Landowner**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1438 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just want to say thankyou for all that have posted with advice - it’s very much appreciated.

I’ve rung the letting agent to be told to contact the apartment block as there’s nothing they can do

- I asked for land owners number (no answer on that number) so left a message and number.

 

I will at some point on Friday go there photo the signage and enquire.

I’ll keep this post up to speed - fingers crossed!

 

It’s now the principle and not the money they want that is bothering me!

Thanks all again 👍🏻

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a matter of interes who was the estate agent?  Might be something in the signage where you parked  that shoots the PPC  in the foot. You could tell whoever is mAnaging the block, that when you conme to view a property with a view to renting, buying or leasing, you don't expect to be charged  £60 or whatever by a parking contractoe for the privilege of viewing it, and you are minded to post your experience on social media, and local press

.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

now you mention a concierge at the block- now this can be  a deciding matter because if the concierce gave you permission or even failed to tell you that you couldnt park then that creates a new contract between you and the landowner that overrides the one the landowner has with the parking co. If they didnt intend to create now conditions the man on the door should have told you " you cant park there mate" and that would have been that so even silence is permissive.

 

I would also bet that the wording of the signage is very limited as to creating contract and big on prohibition so we need to see pictures of the signs so we are able to confirm y suspicion that this demand has no legs whatsoever..

 

Adding my tuppence worth on the merits of using other sites or not

- The advice given  on different sites will often clash and that can cause problems whe trying to follow a procedure.

 

I feel we do pretty well here and follow a path that suits most cases and our general advice on not appealing is correct in most cases and definitely true in all cases involving the IPC. If you want to shop around that is your choice but stick with one forum when you decide to ask for help or you will get confused as to what to do and when.

 

Coupon-mad is an excellent  poster and is a good lay rep to boot but I find the rest of the forum where she posts is a bit slower on the uptake. Some of the facebook groups deal with POPLA appeals only and others try and get you to buy the services of their star posters to write for you when that shouldnt be necessary.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The estate agent who managing the letting is Jullian Wadden but i do know Bridgfords are managing lets there too.

I wonder if they let views know about the parking beforehand? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesnt matter, by the concierge not moving you on they agreed to vary the terms of the parking licence.

An estate agent showing you round is a disinterested third party and has no say in the matter.

 

You could argue that they should have forewarned the block manager that you were visiting but still no obligation or liability or any event on their part so forget about them.

 

If I were a taxi driver and you were my fare I couldnt tell the police that you told me to drive the wrong way down a one way street, you arent in control of anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

As there is a desk in the entrance with someone there ericsbrother's post above #28 is relevant, desk jockey at entrance not warning of the PPC invoicing viewees of properties is remiss and does alter the situation.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a concierge he gave the keys to the agent

- he was watching us on cctv all the time

- I know this because on the way out he mentioned to the agent that he shouldn’t of let us walk around the community space and should just stood at the door and looked due to measurements they had in place for covid.

 

I've got pictures of all correspondence but it won’t let me attach them 😢

Link to post
Share on other sites

Convert images to a single PDF then upl;oad, thats the way only Registered and logged in Caggers can view them, if uploaded directly as jpeg, everyone browsing can see, nit a good idea.

 

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok , that means the concierge has mitigated your actions by allowing you to park.

He is a direct employee of the place so has the right to make such contracts or conversely tell you to get out.

 

OPS's contract is trumped by this direct offer of parking (or at least by not telling you that you cant or warning you that there are conditions attached to viewing the flat that will cost you £100.

 

Now to the NTK.

They rely on numberplate recognition and this is not by ANPR but by CCTV so the wording of the letter is critical and are the timings.

 

The wording of the law is a bit loose here and the parking bandits then abuse the process to get ther money faster and at less expense to themselves.

 

For my money the use of CCTV doesnt fit in with para 6 an 9 of the POFA but there is no legal case that has decided on this either way

 

They fail to say who the ultimate creditor is and that means that NO liability can be created, let alone a keeper liability so appealing has caused you problems because they will think that you have accepted that a contract has been formed.

 

They also say current UK address for the driver, this isnt what the law says, it says current servicable address and that can be anywhere in the EU plus a few other places so if you have a holiday home in Spain use that address for all future correspondence.

 

Zoopla googleview shows the block to eb derelict offices so capture that picture as well as your new shiny building ones.

This throws doubt on some claims about what was there at the time of a supposed breach and also how long a company has been managing a place

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are silly the Lewes CC case where they were tolchocked by D J harvey could well come into play as part of any defence.  They would be very silly to try court.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Managed to leave a message on landowners number - anyway they rang me  and I told them the Problem.

I’ve just received an email to say they have cancelled the parking charge


so many thanks to you all for taking the time to advise because until you guys responded I was just going to pay it to have it over with - glad I stood my ground with your advice.

 

Thank you Caggers 👍🏻

 

One happy lady here today xx
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brillianty, keep that email safe and print a hard copy, the PPC should tell you its dead, but keep that email, as its not unknown for a PPC to revive it 6 months or a year later.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OPS CCTV PCN - Fabrick Apartments, Cheadle Hulme, Stockport - already refused Appeal - parked in visitor bay whilst viewing an Apartment. **CANC'd by :Landowner**

well done CAG

 

please consider a donation to keep us here

 

dx

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, keep copy of communication as parking co's sometime forget they have been told to drop things or on some rare occasions refuse to do so becasue they have already cancelled a number of demands due to their cock-ups and now want soemone to pay for their inconvenience ( Parking Eye)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...