Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Scottish Power Bailiffs/Locksmiths warrant - broke in, bill had been paid - i was in! & asleep!! woke up to find people in my bedroom!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1506 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I hope you can help me with some advice on recourse after a bailiff broke into my home with a locksmith while I was in bed. 

I woke up to find a complete stranger in my downstairs bedroom and 3 others turned out to be waiting in my hall.

I genuinely nearly had a heart attack, I am a woman living alone and was completely naked in bed.

 

The bailiff quickly explained who he was and that he was looking for my electricity meter as they had broke in to change it to a pre-payment meter as they had a warrant. 

I knew absolutely nothing about this. 

 

He politely removed himself while I got dressed, I was in shock and crying by this point. 

 I went out into the hall and he explained that he had an outstanding bill for electricity from August.   

I had paid the bill in full Nov 2019 and was able to show him this by bank statements

 

he said that I should have had a letter to say the bailiff was coming and that the electricity company still had it listed as unpaid, I had had nothing whatsoever except my last bill which was dated Nov 2019.

 

He rang the supplier and they then 'found' the payments and confirmed it was there, saying that as I had paid it on a standing order, their system does not recognise this as a payment method automatically so I should have paid by a different method.   

 

Just for clarity, the  original bill was almost £800 and I had called the supplier at the time to say I couldn't pay all at once and they agreed £200 per month. 

I paid this in August, Sept, Oct and Nov, paying the bill in full.   

 

No payments were missed but their system only recorded the Oct payment, even though all payments were made from same bank using the correct supplier and customer reference number and the Aug, Sept and Nov payment were recorded goodness knows where, but were instantly 'found' when the bailiff called.  

 

The next bill was issued in Nov and considerably less, so I just carried on paying the same £200 and in Nov and Dec 2019 paid that second bill off too.   

The next invoice is due around now but haven;t had it yet. 

 

There were no arrears therefore at the time of entry, no letters issued, no warning.   

They do have my address incorrect, and I have corrected it twice now but they haven;t changed it,  listing it as a village 6 miles from the actual village but the postcode is right so some, if not all, post should still reach me, it was certainly no problem for the bailiff to find me.

 

The bailiff accepted an error had been made and the person who he called at the suppliers just told him to tell me that I could carry on paying the £200 per month for next due and future bills but by direct debit and not standing order.  The four unwelcome visitors all then left my house- without changing the meter.

 

How can this happen, it was the most distressing and frightening experience and I would like help on what recourse I have and with whom.  The supplier?  The bailiff company?  The court for issuing a warrant on a paid debt? Who should have stopped this process in it's tracks before it got to this point? 

 

I haven't slept properly since this, I keep re-picturing the intense fear of waking to find a stranger in your bedroom and even though he explained quickly who he was and left immediately to restore my dignity, that first few moments I thought it was a burglar and I was going to be murdered in my bed.  The neighbours must have found it entertaining too and I am mortified. 

 

I have raised a telephone complaint with the supplier and waiting for somebody to call me back, nothing so far.

 

Can anyone advise me please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welcome to CAG, who is the supplier? You might need to start a complaint with them,  initially to get a paper trail, and the reason they like Direct Debit over Standing Orders is they can unilaterally increase a DD but not a SO. You have had no communication from them as to the bailiff coming with a Locksmith and electrician to change the meter at all.  If you could tell us who the supplier is others will be along soon with further advice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brassnecked.  It was Scottish Power and the bailiff said he was either from a company called Richmond or his own name was Richmond, it's all a blur with the shock.  He did not show me any paperwork at all, although to be fair, I didn't explicitly ask and just listened to what he verbally told me about a warrant being issued and why he had the right to be there. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would escalate your complaint to Scottish Power, Head as Formal Complaint, Might be worth copying your MP and OFGEN.  Others will be along soon to advise other actions you can take.  the Bailiff actually did nothing wrong they had to execute the Warrant Scottish Power obtained, on what looks like dodgy evidence that calls their systems into question. It's Scottish Power who are at fault, as their system obviously cannot deal with Standing orders, but you should have had several letters about this, so that will be part of your complaint, also they will probably have  added the costs of getting the Warrant and bailiff to your account, so check if they have.  All will form part of any complaint and coipy in OFGEM and MP.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Sounds awful, I hope you are OK.

 

Yes you are correct to contact the supplier first. They should have sent a chance to remedy notice at least 28 days before obtaining any warrant from the court, then you should he received a 7 day warning before the bailiff called.

 

Find out about the warrant, ideally you want to see it, but failing that you need to know when it was issued and on the request of whom, try and get a name.

To do this you may have to contact the bailiff unless you know which court issued it. Let us know how you get on..

 

I would also issue a request under GDPR to the company, This will give you records of what went on over the period in question.

You will be able to see if notices have been sent, hopefully.

 

You can ask by phone. I would ask them to provide all details relevant to your account from inception , bank statements, records of phone calls, the lot. Get the name of the person you are talking to and email a confirmation of the request.

 

Please let us know of any developments.

 

Later BN :)

 

 

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes DB let Scottish Power mess it up first then involve OFGEN and MP

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have received good advice from other posters so please do issue a formal complaint.  

 

You mention that your bedroom is located downstairs.  I am curious as to how it could have been that you did not hear somebody either knocking at the door or using a locksmith to force entry?  

 

Did the locksmith repair the lock? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Good point BA If they didn't repair the lock or replace it and give you the keys, that will also be part of the Complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Scottish Power Bailiffs/Locksmiths warrant - broke in, bill had been paid - i was in! & asleep!! woke up to find people in my bedroom!!

Hi All

 

Thanks so much for your advice,

I will keep you updated on developments and as it seems that SP were at fault not the bailiff,

I will contact SP again tomorrow so that they cannot just hope that this goes away. 

 

Thanks Dodgeball, I will do a SAR under GDPR as I want to see what they claim they sent me if anything at all, but certainly nothing was received since 11 Nov which was just a normal bill, otherwise I would have reacted and contacted them to inform that I had fully paid and they had an error somewhere.

 

BA, the bedroom is downstairs but at the rear of the house, it is a very large detached old property with 2 foot thick walls and I was fast asleep when they knocked, I have full CCTV all around and watched it afterwards, they knocked twice and then broke in.  

 

There is an outer double porch door which makes it hard to hear knocking from the rear of the house but these outer doors are usually unlocked and open once I am up and about - but were locked that morning as I was still in bed fast asleep.   

 

No damage to locks that I can see and no locks changed, they appeared to 'pick' the locks on the outer door according to the CCTV. although I couldn't tell how they got through the inner door as their bodies were in the way of the camera shot but it was quick, which makes me question my lock security too and will be upgrading.  

 

 What woke me up was him coming into the bedroom and I hadn't heard a thing before that.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

They might well give you the runaround on the phone so if you can record any call, a Formal Complaint in writing by email with a hard copy in the post with a free proof of posting from a post office counter. And get that SAR off todyY, its now free under GDPR regulations.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the detailed reply. 

I am truly dismayed at what you have experienced and I would urge you to keep the forum updated. 

 

I agree that the fault certainly appears to be that of Scottish Power.

It is really important that you keep a 'paper trail' so I would encourage you to write to the company.

By all means, call them today and ask for the contact details of the relevant department. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

 

Just to update you on this matter, they did give me the run around for over a week, with promised call backs from the Complaints Dept which never materialised but I persisted.

 

They have offered me compensation by way of a goodwill gesture of £50, then when I declined, they increased it to £80 but will not budge on this.  I have no idea what is reasonable considering their actions but to me, £80 seems very low considering that they broke into my home unlawfully and caused me such a lot of distress.   

 

It transpired that they had also added the cost of this 'visit' to my account of £27 and £150, but have now removed these charges.   

 

Thanks to Brassnecked for suggesting that I check this as I wouldn't have thought of it and you were right, they had applied these charges and have only removed them when I directly asked whether they had done this. 

 

They now say that we have reached 'deadlock' as they have made two offers that I have declined, and are sending me a letter to that effect so that I can go to the ombudsman.

 

Am I being unreasonable expecting more than £80 for what they did or are they just trying it on?  I really think that £80 for such a catastrophic error seems measly and I am not after a windfall here, I am genuinely not rubbing my hands in glee that I'm getting a payout as I would much prefer that it had never happened in the first place as it has taken my sense of security in my home away and that is priceless.  I just don't think that £80 sounds the right level considering I was in tears for two whole days, cancelled a social event as I was too upset to go and can't sleep properly (or naked) any more. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting back, £80 seems paltry for such a mess I would hold fire until more of the team have stopped by as there will be suggestions for you to consider, looking for ones that will be of benefit to you.  I thought they would add the cost of their warrant to the account, and good on you for remembering and challenging, they would have just left it there if you hadn't.  At least you now have some control over the situation and  they are on the back foot.

 

Not too sure about GDPR, but if the whole Court Application was wrong, and therefore the transfer of your data to Bailiff and locksmith was not covered as a legitimate legal purpose, due to warrant was wrongful through application and Execution there might have been a GDPR breach that would be worth about £500 to yourself.  However that is not certan, so others may have thoughts

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...