Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car park penalty Thurrock council


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1540 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Any useful advice to the following is appreciated.

 

This time I got a ticket on my windscreen at the pay and display car park I use every morning for work - on 3/12/2019. 

Once again I had no clue what this was for as I never, ever knowingly contravene! 

 

it was for parking outside a marked bay. 

There is no reason for me to do this as the time I arrive every morning there are always about 20 empty spaces and that day was no exception. 

 

Long story short

I checked the next day where I had parked and it was an end space. 

Although the line on one side is quite faint it is definitely noticeable. 

I took a picture of it. 

 

Meanwhile I sent an email the same night as the ticket, saying that I was inside the line. 

My first thought was that they were saying I parked on top of a line instead of inside. 

As I said in my email, I always check I am inside (as I don't take chances).

 

I didn't hear anything back until I got a letter today saying I had made no representation and owe £50. 

There is still a chance to appeal. 

 

As it stands I see it as my word against theirs as there is no photographic evidence provided. 

If there is any I am confident that I am right. 

I am going to appeal, attaching my email sent, which seems to have been bypassed. 

 

Would there be any photographic evidence? 

Any suggestions on what I can do?

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • honeybee13 changed the title to Car park penalty Thurrock council

the CEO will have taken pictures so you need to demand to see them so you can decide whether to formally appeal or not.

 

I would also be having a pop at the council for failing to correctly safeguard yur data, namely the letter or email sent for the soft appeal.

I once had a similar tickt in Surrey and the end bay wasnt actually a bay but as the paintwork was so delapidated they determined that  the motorist wouldnt know that as the non bay was actually too small and generally used for putting bins in. Worth measuringa dn photographng in case they dont cancel.

 

Send a copy of your emal to them by post as well and tell them that you are going to appeal to the adjudicator on their failure to follow their own procedure as well as the incorrect issue of the ticket in the first place. They may well decide that discretion can be used after all

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 17/01/2020 at 11:44, ericsbrother said:

the CEO will have taken pictures so you need to demand to see them so you can decide whether to formally appeal or not.

 

I would also be having a pop at the council for failing to correctly safeguard yur data, namely the letter or email sent for the soft appeal.

I once had a similar tickt in Surrey and the end bay wasnt actually a bay but as the paintwork was so delapidated they determined that  the motorist wouldnt know that as the non bay was actually too small and generally used for putting bins in. Worth measuringa dn photographng in case they dont cancel.

 

Send a copy of your emal to them by post as well and tell them that you are going to appeal to the adjudicator on their failure to follow their own procedure as well as the incorrect issue of the ticket in the first place. They may well decide that discretion can be used after all

 

Some interesting points.  I am going to appeal definitely about them failing to follow their own procedure.  Thank you for this.

Edited by joyjoyjoy
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I'd suggest appealing it based on the poor markings. 

 

I got a parking ticket in Camden in Autumn 2018. Residents Bay which was not sufficiently differentiated from adjoining Pay and Display bays. Got my photographs together and a clear statement of my arguments. Stick tio the facts however bone headed the Council appear to be. The Adjudicators have a library of significant cases on their website, see if there are cases similar to use. If there are it will help you see how thw adjudicators approach the issue of parking outwith bays that are ill-marked. These cases are not a binding precedent but can be persuasive. I was lucky in that there was one at exactly the same location and pretty much identical facts 20 years previously. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 01/02/2020 at 14:37, Bromptonaut said:

I'd suggest appealing it based on the poor markings. 

 

I got a parking ticket in Camden in Autumn 2018. Residents Bay which was not sufficiently differentiated from adjoining Pay and Display bays. Got my photographs together and a clear statement of my arguments. Stick tio the facts however bone headed the Council appear to be. The Adjudicators have a library of significant cases on their website, see if there are cases similar to use. If there are it will help you see how thw adjudicators approach the issue of parking outwith bays that are ill-marked. These cases are not a binding precedent but can be persuasive. I was lucky in that there was one at exactly the same location and pretty much identical facts 20 years previously. 

Thank you.  Of course my appeal has just been rejected.  They also said they haven't received my email.  I had sent a hard copy as proof so they're saying although they never got it they're willing to go back to the original £25 charge.  Hopefully I can get some justice with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're confident you are correct take it to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. The worst that can happen is you lose and have to pat £50. The success rate for those who attend the hearing with a well prepared case is pretty high. 

 

It was a bit of a busman's holiday for me as I previously worked in an Quango that had some oversight of Tribunals including those concerned with parking. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm wondering now, as the photos show there are only 3 lines so the one that would be in front of the car is missing.  Unfortunately I didn't notice. The infuriating thing is there were plenty more spaces so I wasn't parking there because the car park was full.  I believe it was a space once upon a time and it is obviously not blocking anyone else.  Do you think I sill have any chance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

your argument will be about confusion as to what a marked bay is is there is no indication that whwere you parked wasnt a bay. Dont think about the line at the front of the bay means nothing as far as the markings go unless they are trying to rely on bay sizes that apply to on street parking

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...