Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Centrica/CST claimform - Industrial Training Bond ***Claim Discontinued***


BadMojo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 380 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have attached the Letter of Claim

 

They continue to refer to it as an overpayment of wages. It is not.

 

I have the envelope, but there's no post mark, or date. Just a QR code and some sort of reference number. I hand wrote on the envelope the date I received it, as it shocked me how long it had taken to get to me.

 

So is my next step to call Centrica/BG and tell them what's happening and discuss a resolution? If I am, do I need to be careful with my words and not acknowledge any debt? Should I be asking for a copy of their contracts to show that I do/dont owe anything?

 

The money (£3000) wasn't taken in full, as my wage was not large enough to cover it. The final amount on the payslip was a minus amount! There was no supporting paperwork at the time, or afterwards, explaining anything to do with the training bond or monies owed. Until I started to receive DCA letters much later (start of thread).

LOC_08-07-2021.pdf

Edited by BadMojo
Link to post
Share on other sites

well no details of how the debt is made there then, so their POC is trash and that needs pointing out later.

 

go ring centrica/BG, findout what is going on as it appears they are after the 2yrs figure of £6k and the £2781 is the outstanding having already had £3k as last wages grab back.

 

see what you can find out, but don't go ringing CST even if told too they will LIE.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I may not have been clear regarding the final wageslip as I've been concentrating on the training bond of £3000.

 

They attempted to deduct £3000 along with other deductions, like tax, NI, pension, but they also took £1000 which was a retention bonus paid at the start of the year (on the understanding that it would be recovered if you left within 12 months.

At the time, I had no intention of leaving, so accepted it.)

 

I wasn't actually paid enough that month to cover all these deductions, so my wage was displayed as a negative amount on my slip. -£2,797.08.

 

they've attempted to recover £4000, but were only able to get their hands on £1200.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good in away then only after £3k then.

 

go have a chat i'm sure it will clarify things, see what they say.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I called Centrica People Services, which is said to handle calls from current and ex-employees.

 

They gave me a number for Centrica Collections, but that number is 'not accepting calls right now'.

I called People Services back and got an email address.

 

The guy on the phone was able to look up my file and suggested, from the limited details he has access to, that it was for the training bond. For a better response I need to email collections so they can refer to payroll.

 

Shall I pen them a brief email asking to explain CST's impending court action and/or ask for copies of any documents they have in support of their claim?

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

it is not CST's impending court action, centrica are the claimant

 

good lets see what transpires, we just need to be mindful not to miss AOS deadline

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the claimant will have to prove with documentation that you owe the money.

you can't jeopardise your position at all, like admitting etc.

their POC is pants they cant just say we've already told him what he owes.

 

as i say i suspect centrica have no idea CST have actually raised a claim i bet but of course must have given permission for it to sometime 'happen' 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a reply from Centrica today. They're sending me a 

breakdown of the overpayment and a copy of my contract. 

 

They've also placed a hold on the case with CST Law until the information has been received, as this could take up to 10 working days

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant, keep to the court timeline regardless.

 

dont miss aos

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual on the Gov't Gateway Site
 note down your details inc the long gateway number given, you might need it later.
 then log in to the MCOL Website
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
[BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ]
click thru to the end
confirm and exit MCOL.
...

get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
...
.[use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt]
.

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/

.

on BOTH type your name ONLY
Do Not sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork 
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

..............


 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have responded to the AOS as advised above.

 

I have tweaked the document you listed and have a draft saved. What is the best/safest way for it to be reviewed here before I post it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

most of the text is std 

if you mean the list of what docs you have requested copy and past that section here.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've received a reply from Centrica. They've emailed me two documents. The first a break down of the 'debt'. The second a copy of my employment contract. 

 

The payroll document is basically a rewording of my last month's wage slip, highlighting income and deductions. I didn't receive enough pay to cover the reclamation of the £1000 retention bonus and £3000 training bond, so it left me with a minus amount, approx - £2800 owed, a debt in their words. 

 

The second document is a digital version of my employment contract, which it says I signed digitally in April 2015, a few months before I started working for them. There is no written signature. It shows a date, time and IP address. 

 

"To discuss repayment options please call 0333 202 9690 or send an email to:

[email protected]" .

Edited by BadMojo
Link to post
Share on other sites

redact and upload to one multipage PDF please.

read our upload guide carefully

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR letter. Pretty much word for word original document. Removed a few of the numbered points; left in one; added a second (very basic)

 

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of the documents mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

·         The agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

·         Full particulars of the alleged overpayment of salary/expenses.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

read upload carefully use the sites listed there too.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Attached is the employment contract. Section on training bond towards rear.

 

The document had no physical signature. But the final page had (now redacted) a date and IP address relating to what was possibly a digital signature, i.e. tick a box to agree, type thing.

Contract_redacted.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

6.8 On termination of your employment the Company may deduct from your final salary payment and any other sums due to you from the Company an ;mount equal to any sums you owe to the Company, inducting but not limited to any amounts repayable in respect of training and assessment costs pursuant to these Terms and Conditions of Employment and the attached Training Bond.

 

 

1 hour ago, BadMojo said:

The document had no physical signature. But the final page had (now redacted) a date and IP address relating to what was possibly a digital signature, i.e. tick a box to agree, type thing.

 

the above constitutes a digital signature under the relevant act.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

under the 2006 digital signature rules (IP address can be traceable ), you will be deemed to have agreed to the terms of the contract.

of which the above states.

 

pers i can't see a way out of this.

might be an idea to investigate a Tomlin Order with CST 

unless anyone has any other ideas.

 

just another thought..

as you have a contact at collections whom have said they have instigated a 'hold' , why don't you go ring them back tomorrow and thank them for the information and that you now realise you are liable for the training bond 3yrs sum.

 

ask them if they would be willing to enter into a reasonable monthly payment scheme if they drop the court claim totally....that might atleast save you a few £'s on their court fees etc etc 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was reaching a similar conclusion. Unless someone can offer another option I am going to have to enter into negotiations on repayment. 

 

Now, I'm in considerable credit card debt and can complete financial statements (like the one CST Law included with their letter) to show this. How do courts usually view this fact/information? I am not in a position to pay £3000. So it will either have to be significantly reduced, or paid back over a significant time period. 

 

What are the pros, cons, considerations for sending Centrica Collections a financial statement of facts as part of our conversation /negotiation? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

other than agreeing to the the tomlin the court have no part to play if you go tomlin.

i'd suggest you ring BG as suggested see if they'll drop the claim totally. that way courts not ever involved, its a mutual agreement.

even if you lost the whole case the judge would only order a small £PCM payment which if untenable can be varied via an N245.

 

so go direct and start low say £10-£25PCM?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...