Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

@curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK refused to honour purchase


Irt8787
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1642 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is not at all unexpected. At the very least you can expect to be tested to the point where you will have to decide whether or not to pay the hearing fee. When you pay the hearing fee they will then assess the situation again, make a decision as to whether or not they think you are serious and then they may decide to put their hands up because they consider it's not economically worthwhile defending.

On the other hand of course they may decide to go the whole hog and see you in court.

Please let us know when you get the directions questionnaire because there will be questions which we should probably help you answer. 

 

However before then, you should receive the defence. Please post the defence up for us to see. If by any chance they miss the date for filing the defence then you should move in immediately and apply for judgement. Monitor the time very carefully and go in immediately at the expiry of the deadline for filing a defence and apply for a judgement. However, they are probably unlikely to miss this deadline – but you never know

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well thanks for your interest. I would say it's a foregone conclusion and its really just a question of how stupid they really want to be as to whether it gets sorted out quickly or takes some time

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, I don't pretend to be as expert on this as bankfodder but I wholeheartedly agree with all his advice and your actions, what's the point of all the consumer law if no-one has the gumption to use it. As he says, its made to be suitable for the common man and this appears to be very simple legally.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

And I think you've hit the nail on the head.

There are lots of people who don't know their rights.
There are lots of people who do know their rights and don't have the confidence to enforce them.
And then there are people with the gumption

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

This is quite an extraordinary defence because according to my recollection you have said that you have got very clear written evidence of the fact that you ordered a completely different machine. Can you confirm

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes. see post 17. i attached a copy of invoice with LBA

 

✅ Order confirmed: APPLE MacBook Pro 15... 2.pdf Invoice 2.PDF

Order Despatch & VAT receipt - APPLE MacBook Pro 15%22 with Touch Bar - 256 GB SSD 2.pdf

 

 the paper invoice that came with incorrect machine says mbp 13 but I bought a mbp 15 and the emails above (order confirmation, invoice, despatch confirmation) support that

IMG_0515.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have very patchy access to the internet at the moment. Please monitor this thread for a fuller reply later

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that somebody obviously hasn't looked very carefully at the documents and doesn't understand the situation.

at some point you will receive a directions questionnaire and you will be offered mediation.

personally I would refuse the mediation. They have more than enough evidence to show that they have made a bad mistake.

On the other hand, I would suggest that you write to them immediately and point out the error and supply them with the copies of the documents that you have which show exactly what you bought and what you paid for and what you were invoiced for and point out to them that they have made a bad error here and that you would recommend that they withdraw their defence and settle the matter without further recourse to litigation.

I would tell them that in view of the overwhelming evidence, you will be refusing mediation because you consider that it will be time-wasting and that there is no middle ground between you but you are giving them an opportunity now to bring this senseless dispute to an end and to honour the commitment that they made. Tell them that you will bring this correspondence to the attention of the judge if they force it to a hearing.

you may receive advice from others here who suggest that you should go to mediation and so you will have to decide which route you prefer.

I would suggest that you send them the evidence now.  when you get the allocation questionnaire then you can take the opportunity then to repeat that you have the evidence and that you have supplied it to the other side and that because of this you object to the application to strike your claim out.

 

Incidentally, do not withdraw your claim or agreed to withdraw your claim until you have the goods that you have contracted form or else and agreement to supply you with those goods or the refund has been contained in a Tomlin order

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this alright? copy and paste work

Quote

 

Dear DSG Retail Limited,

 

Re: Small claims

      Claim no. F5QZ2A8T

 

I am writing with regards to above small claims against DSG Retail Ltd.

 

In your defence you contended that I made a purchase of an Apple MBP 13TB 512SG for £1808. I would like to point out again that you have made a mistake. I hereby provided copies of documents which showed exactly what I bought and paid for, and what I was invoiced for.

 

I would recommend that you withdraw your defence and settle the matter without further recourse to litigation. In view of overwhelming evidence I will be refusing mediation as I consider it to be time-wasting.

 

I am giving you an opportunity to bring this dispute to an end and to honour the commitment that you made. I will bring this correspondence to the attention of the judge if this ends up in a hearing.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if anyone else has anything to say but I'll suggest a couple of amendments later. Mainly though it's fine

Link to post
Share on other sites

“I hereby provided copies of documents which showed exactly what I bought and paid for, and what I was invoiced for.”

 

->

 

“I enclose copies of documents which showed exactly what I bought and paid for, and what I was invoiced for, the 15” model, which forms the crux of this matter : I contracted and paid for the 15” model, and it was only after I paid that the listing was amended to show the 13” model you have supplied in error”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

Dear DSG Retail Limited,

 

Re: Small claims

      Claim no. F5QZ2A8T

 

I am writing with regards to above small claims against DSG Retail Ltd.

you will see that the basis of my claim is that I purchased an Apple XXXX for £XXX reduced from its recommended retail price of £XXX.
Your defence is based on your belief that this is not the laptop that I bought and rather I bought an Apple MBP 13TB 512SG for £1808.

I would suggest that you have another look at the papers and to help you I am enclosing copies of the documents relating to the sale of this item.
You will see that you advertised the item on eBay at a special promotional price eBay item reference number XXX
You will see that on this basis I did for the item and the sale was concluded on XXX date – so reference number XXX.
You will see that on XXX date I paid the full asking price against your invoice number XXX – the reduced promotional price of the item .
You will then see that you sent me a model which was a cheaper version, not the items was advertised, not the item which you agree to sell me and for which I paid.

In telephonic communications with your office it was explained to me that there was an error and the item which I bought should not have been listed. My position is of course that if you had refused to sell it to me then I would have had no claim against you. However, you did agree to sell it to me, you accepted the money for it and you then send me a completely different item without any recourse or explanation.

It is clear that you are in breach of contract.

I'm writing to you with this information to give you an opportunity to solve this matter without any further embarrassment or economic loss to yourselves.

Please understand that this letter is not a without prejudice letter and it will be brought to the attention of the court if you force this matter to go to hearing.

When the directions questionnaire arrives I shall indicate that I'm not prepared to mediate the matter – as I consider that there is no middle ground between us.
Either you are aware of the error and you are not prepared honour the obligations which you have entered into or to respect my consumer rights, or else you clearly do not understand what your obligations to your customers are.

Either way, this is not a dispute which you can hope to win and I hope that you will accept that this letter is simply a gesture of goodwill towards you in an attempt to resolve this matter without wasting any further time or expense to either this or any inconvenience to the court.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

 

Your letter is perfectly fine but this one might be a little more structured. Take whichever you want or amend them to produce something that suits your taste.

 

Whatever you do, don't lose sight of the fact that DSG retail are idiots, they seem to see consumers as their enemy and they seem to take things very personally. I can only imagine that they manage to face down so many consumers who have perfectly good cases and who are deprived of just outcomes simply because those consumers are ordinary members of the public who don't know their rights and aren't lucky enough to find this forum and come to us for help. If

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick one, searching the eBay item number brings up a listing for a 13 inch version as they are saying it was.

 

If you go onto you eBay purchase history, open up the listing in question at the top it will say the seller has edited the listing click to see the original listing. It may be worth taking screenshots of that as I don't know how long eBay holds the pre-revised version for. This will prove without a doubt that they have made the changes after the item was purchased.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I have taken the screenshots as advised.

 

hi need some help with directions questionnaire. do i need to send a copy to currys? and on returning the completed form to Northampton county court do i include a cheque for hearing fee?  thanks

 

and what reason should i give for choosing my local county court in question D1?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it came from northampton yes.....and yes a copy to the claimants solicitor..do 3 copies ...Court solicitor and your file.

 

You dont pay the hearing fee yet you will be advised of a date after you submit the DQ.

 

Your Local Court because you are the litigant in the claim against a company.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...