Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you BankFodder. I will do as you suggest to get everything in writing first and will construct the letter of claim over the weekend. Is it best to use the format for the letter of claim as the one on this website? Lastly, did I read the judgement correctly for the Farooq judgement as its not quite clear to me which act I am covered best by?
    • A letter of claim can't be served by email as per CPR 6.3 unless you've specifically told them. Also can't give you 7 days to pay, they've got to give at least 14 days. They know this, they're just hoping you wet yourself and cough up. This won't be going anywhere. IGNORE.
    • Good Morning, I received a speeding ticket last December, I had requested further information from the ticket office which they provided, I also sent back the form confirming i was the diver at the time, however, i had overlooked the signature at the bottom of the page, nobody from the ticket office got back in touch to mention this and i was trying to book a course with no luck, I got in touch with them and sent them a screenshot showing them I was unable to book the course, they came came back to me and said we have no documents to say you were the driver (they did they just failed to mention I never signed it) they re sent the form and it was over the 120 days, i had mentioned to them previously that the timeframe was coming up and they would need to extend this. They are now saying they have complied legally and i need to accept the 3 points, I am trying to plead my case and I am tempted to let this go to court and provide the evidence of my constant communication on the matter. has anyone got any experience with this? TIA.
    • Thank you. I'm looking into it at the moment.  Straight away it says last sold in 2007. Thank you every one for all your help. It's much appreciated. 
    • Just on bankfodder's final point above. The Title Register you get online for £3 can't legally be used as proof of ownership for the property. Right now they'll suffice to see if there's an asset there. Should you need to use it in court to say he's trading at that address, you'll need to fill out an OC1 form with HM Land Registry to get an official copy in the post, which costs £7.00. Make sure that you get the Title Register, not the Title Plan! Title Register will tell you who owns the property etc while the Title Plan will tell you the property boundaries etc which isn't relevant in this case.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Southern Water/shumans/Shakespeare Martineau claim form - debts from 2007 - 1st claim struck out - now 2nd claim.


Bekki0405
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1074 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

no its not closed !!...its been struck out...dead.

 

they can wave their arms all they like about the debt ...nothing they can now do AFAIK.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they start a new claim?

Does anyone know if this debt, some £3500, will be written off.

 

I can’t quite believe that will be it from Southern Water.

 

I’m currently paying them for the current bill,

but am I right in thinking that the County Court claim is not only dead, but the debt is now unenforceable

Link to post
Share on other sites

its dead forget it.as my last post 

 

Shulmans issued all these claims when I suspect SW litigations team knew nothing about them at all.

that's why they got dumped.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have won on a technicality so to speak.....but it can be reversed if the claimant makes application for relief from sanctions......but unlikely.

 

Well done thread title amended.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • AndyOrch changed the title to Southern Water/shumans claim form - debts from 2007 ***Claim Struck Out***

And the debt Andy, what would be the best course of action for the actual debt that SW say I owe?.

Do I call them and make an offer to pay.

They’re not going to write it off,

Do I need to make contact

Link to post
Share on other sites

no.

any sum/bill that was included in this litigation you can effectively now forget about.

they cant demand it, they've tried court, they failed.

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes if you genuinely owe.....but nothing in connection to claim ...costs/ fees ..only true water debt. 

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I received a County Court claim form for an outstanding debt from Southern Water, with Shakespeare Martineau named as the solicitor firm.

I filed an acknowledgment within the allotted time, and have been drawing up my defence, and would like some help before I file it with the court, I have been reading up on things I can find related to this situation,  it much of it is old and out of date possibly. 

 

My issue with this county court claim form received 14 days ago, is that I have received no other correspondence from either company, and from what I have read, Shakespeare Martineau are known to use texts with links to online letters.

 

I haven’t received anything from this solicitors firm, until today, when I have now received a letter in the post from them. The letter is dated the 22/4/21, and states that I can contact them to arrange payment. 

 

Two things here,

firstly,

does anyone have suggestions about whether to contact the solicitors to arrange payment, or to contact SW.  I’m confused now how they can write to me, for the first time, asking me to make an arrangement to pay, two weeks after I received a claim form? I would really like to arrange to pay SW and have the debt returned to them.

 

I was involved in a life changing traumatic accident last year, and this has affected my mental health and focus on debts. I have spoken to Stepchange and they have advised there is a form I can fill in and send to companies to receive compassionate support during this time. Has anyone used this before, and does it work?

 

secondly,

I need to file the defence which I’ve written, as otherwise they will judge against me automatically. Is there anyone who could cast an eye and tell me if it’s suitable please. 

 

 

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.
  
The Claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (pre action protocol) Failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant to 7.1 PAPDC.
 
It is accepted that I currently reside in an area that is serviced by the Claimant as a statutory water and sewerage undertaker pursuant to the Water Industry Act 1991 (the Act).
 
The Claimants claim of £4882.20 for unpaid sewerage charges payable under s.142-144 of the Act and the Claimants' Charges Scheme for the period 14/01/14 to 23/07/20 is denied. The claimant has never billed or contacted or requested this amount and is put to strict proof to evidence this fact.
 
Furthermore the claimant is prevented from back billing for a period of more than 6 years pursuant to the limitation act 1980.
 
I requested information with regards to making a payment arrangement or through the Watersure scheme but have had no reply to my communication.
 
I was not offered a payment card, or any offer of help, despite my contact to state I have a disabled child. It is therefore for the above reasons that the claimant claim is denied

 

As an aside, the debt is in both my husband and my names. I’ve discovered my husband had been hiding debt, and not paying certain bills. We have separated and are going through a divorce, and he lives elsewhere. I’ve told him there will be a debt which needs paying, in some form, and he said he will make a payment monthly if an agreement is made with SW.

 

 Is there anyway I can get this debt split between us, I’m not sure there’s is, but thought I’d ask. 

 

Thank you 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you post up a copy of the original claim which you have received in PDF format.

It's very important that we see the whole thing – the original.

Also please can you post up any other documents in PDF format. Single file multipage PDF.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, send the water company and SAR. Do immediately. It will take 30 days but still it will be important to get as much information as possible from them.

Additionally, if you have evidence from the Internet that this firm of solicitors commonly tries to do everything by text messages et cetera. Please start accumulating that evidence and let us know what you find.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please complete this.

You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do - Financial Legal Issues - Consumer Action Group

 

you can SAR but thats immaterial in a way , the claimant must disclose all docs during their claim else it will fall flat.

 

need to the answers above to see if that defence is OK. and ofcourse you did send SM a CPR 31:14?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And please will you post any documents in PDF format please. As requested.

Not images, not JPEGs, not screenshots – PDF documents

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some reading for you

 

https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:3134625398&q=Southern Water claimform&oq=Southern Water claimform&gs_l=partner-generic.12...234264.260224.0.263381.24.24.0.0.0.0.1527.6446.0j1j0j2j1j1j0j1j2.8.0.csems%2Cnrl%3D13...0.25953j80036523j24...1j4.34.partner-generic..24.0.0.VNY9Vi4nmPQ

 

looks like a good % of the debt is statute barred..nothing new there then!!

 

just makes sure in your cpr 31:14 you ask for copies of all bills that form a part of the claimed sum .

 

register on mcol and make sure you have done aos.

 

Do not file that defence you put up!

 

after reading ALL the threads in the above link adapt one of the part statute barred defences and pop it up here for checking.

 

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Southern Water Services 

 

Date of issue –  30 Mar 2021

 

 

Particulars of Claim

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? 

1.The Claimant is a statutory water and sewage undertaker pursuant to the Water Industry Act 1991 (the Act).

 

2.The Claimant claims the sum of £4380.99 for unpaid water and/or sewage charges payable under s.142-144 of the Act and the Claimants’ Charges Scheme.

 

3.The unpaid sum of £4830.99 is for water and/or sewerage services provided to the Defendant(s) at XXXX for the period 14.01.14 to 23.07.20 Interest at a rate of 8.00% to 26/03/2021 amounts to £236.21 and is increasing at a daily rate of £0.96. 

 

AND THE CLAIMANTS CLAIMS

(1) The principle sum of £4380.99.

(2) Interest under s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 of £236.21 and

(3) Continuing internet on (1) above from 26/03/2021 to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.96

 

What is the total value of the claim? £4882.20
 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?NO
 

Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?NO (not sure about ex husband)
 

Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? water and/or sewerage services

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?YES (2006)
 

Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online 
 

Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?NO
 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. SW
 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NO
 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? NO
 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? NO
 

Why did you cease payments? I believed my ex husband to be paying this bill, but he had hid that this and other bills were not being paid 
 

What was the date of your last payment? Unsure 
 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? YES
 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan YES but no communication from them except to say I wasn’t entitled to help via an online form. I emailed subsequently to ask for support to pay and had no reply at the time. This was Nov 2019 after which I became unwell 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Southern Water/Shakespeare Martineau Claimform - water and/or sewerage services debt part poss SB'd.

pers i'd run this all the way

wont hurt or cost you anything more

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

 

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

request copies of all bills relating to the date range in their particulars of claim

.

don't sign anything

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the time of the last one, and it being struck out, my ex said he’d set up a payment for future bills with SW (now found to be not true) and I had assumed that the old debt wasn’t able to be claimed from the date of being struck out.

 

When I separated from him, I contacted SW for help with ongoing bills, and asked for help to pay the water account, which was denied and no further contact was received.

 

when I received this letter today, I guessed my assumption of the old debt was wrong and that it still remains. Because they’re looking for the entire amount, so does the case being struck out, wipe the old debt. Or is it still due?

 

I’ve already completed the AOS.

Is there a template for the CPR 31:14, I’ll go back and look at the threads, I’m sure there’s one on there 

FOUND IT!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Southern Water/shumans claim form - debts from 2007 - 1st claim struck out - now new claim!!
On 01/09/2019 at 12:46, Andyorch said:

Yes if you genuinely owe.....but nothing in connection to claim ...costs/ fees ..only true water debt. 

 

so will almost the same defence as before @andyorch  i'm sure will check things over later in the week defence is not due till friday @ 4pm.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ive put back up your assistance application form as PDF now.

 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thanks. In the meantime I’ll send the CPR 31.14 off to SM. Could someone give me a nod to the wording. I’m assuming the Statement of Account is the actual bills, or do I add that to the list? 

 

Dear Sir,
 
Re: Southern Water Services v .....


CPR 31.14 Request
 
On 5th April 2021 I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the Northampton County Court Business Centre. 
 
I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.
 
Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of each of the following documents mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:
 
1: the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.
 
2: Notice of Assignment

3: The Default Notice 
 
4: Statement of Account
 


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dx100uk said:

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

request copies of all bills relating to the date range in their particulars of claim

.

don't sign anything

.

dx

dump the list on the cpr replace with what i posted earlier as above!!

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the particulars the same...same amount claimed... same dates ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...