Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sars request sent on 16th March and also sent a complaint separately to Studio. Have received no response. Both letters were received and signed for.  I was also told by the financial ombudsman that studio were investigating but I've also had no response to that either.  The only thing Studio have sent me is a default notice.  Any ideas of what I can do from here please 
    • Thanks Bank - I shall tweak my draft and repost. And here's today's ridiculous email from the P2G 'Claims Dept' Good Morning,  Thank you for you email. Unfortunately we would be unable to pay the amount advised in your previous email.  When you placed the order, you were asked for the value of your parcel, you stated that the value was £265.00. At this stage the booking advised that you were covered to £20.00 and to enhance this to £260.00 you could pay an extra £13.99 + VAT to fully cover your item for loss or damage during transit, you declined to fully cover your item.  Towards the end of your booking on the confirmation page, you were then offered to take cover again, to which you declined again.  Unfortunately, we would be unable to offer you an enhanced payment on this occasion.  If I can assist further, please do let me know.  Kindest Regards Claims Team and my response Good Afternoon  Do you not understand the court cases of PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729)? In both cases it was held by the courts that there was no need for additional ‘cover’ or ‘protection’ (or whatever you wish to call it) on top of the standard delivery charge, and P2G were required to pay up in full for both cases, which by then also included court costs and interest. I shall be including copies of both those judgements in the bundle I submit to the court next Wednesday 1 May, unless you settle my claim (£274.10) in full before then. Tick tock…..    
    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

36 month gym contract


Hobo123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1855 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've been directed here from reddit. Reading a few threads i think i have my answer but want to make sure i am ok to cancel my DirectDebit

 

So 2yrs ago i signed up to a local gym (Choices health club - Derby)i was told it was a special offer at £20 a month due to a grant of some sort. Today i emailed them stating i would like to cancel with immediate effect as i've not been in over a year, to which they respond to say its a 36 month contract and i have 1 year left!?

 

However i was not told this was a minimum term of 36 months! However after reviewing the T&Cs it does state its a 36 months term. I think 36 months i a very unfair term as anything can change in that period.

 

Can i cancel my direct debit worry free or do i need to go about this another way?

 

Thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you are quite right. 36 months is far too long and it is unfair.

 

Send them a letter telling them that you are cancelling the contract because it is unfairly long. Tell them that as a gesture of goodwill you are giving them one months notice and you are cancelling your direct debit.

 

Get ready for a debt collection letters et cetera threats. Come here when you get them – but don't worry about them.

 

Cancel your direct debit the bank. Best to read our customer services guide first. Implement the advice there and then cancel the direct debit. Confirm the cancellation in writing.

 

If the bank causes you any problems then begin a formal complaint and come here and tell us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice of Reddit to refer you here. Can you give us the link of the post which recommended you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hobo and welcome to CAG

 

Any gym agreement longer than 12 months is now deemed to be unfair to you as a consumer.

 

Despite what Bankfodder has said above, I suggest that you can cancel the agreement and the DD mandate without giving a month's notice - on the basis that the 36 month m/ship agreement was unfair and not enforceable.

 

I therefore suggest you cancel the DD mandate via your bank immediately to stop further DD's being taken.

 

Was this the Allestree or the Raynesway gym.

 

No doubt you will be contacted by the gym and/or their admin company when they find the DD has been stopped. Let us know what they say and what admin Co is involved.

 

Read other threads here for confirmation that gym cases do NOT result in court action, bailiffs or adverse CRA reports.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you will be best off following the advice given by slick132. He is much more up on this kind of thing than me. I suppose I am being overcautious

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hobo and welcome to CAG

 

Any gym agreement longer than 12 months is now deemed to be unfair to you as a consumer.

 

Despite what Bankfodder has said above, I suggest that you can cancel the agreement and the DD mandate without giving a month's notice - on the basis that the 36 month m/ship agreement was unfair and not enforceable.

 

I therefore suggest you cancel the DD mandate via your bank immediately to stop further DD's being taken.

 

Was this the Allestree or the Raynesway gym.

 

No doubt you will be contacted by the gym and/or their admin company when they find the DD has been stopped. Let us know what they say and what admin Co is involved.

 

Read other threads here for confirmation that gym cases do NOT result in court action, bailiffs or adverse CRA reports.

 

:-)

 

Done and thank you for the reply. It was the Allestree branch. I'll keep you all informed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Noted and let us know when an admin or collection Co contacts you.......

 

........ but don't reply to them until we know who it is and what they say.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Noted and let us know when an admin or collection Co contacts you.......

 

........ but don't reply to them until we know who it is and what they say.

 

:-)

 

Got my first email from:

 

Bespoke Direct Debt Services

Service User Number: 406492

Service User Name: Debit Finance Collections Plc

 

 

"Account Name: X.XXXXXXX

Reference Number: XXXXXXXXXXX - Choices Health Club

Notification of Unpaid Direct Debit Payment

 

We would like to inform you that we have been unable to collect your payment due on 1st January 2019 for your membership of Choices Health Club.

 

As you have missed a payment, click on the following link to make a payment online: pay(dot)debitfinance(dot)co(dot)uk or contact us on 01908 422 007

 

Please note that your 1st January 2019 payment for £35.00 (including a £15.00 late payment charge) must reach us within 7 days of the date of this email. If we have to send you a second reminder you will incur a further fee of £15.00, as per the terms of your agreement.

 

Your next Direct Debit payment will be taken from your account on or after 1st February 2019. If we do not have valid Direct Debit details we suggest you contact us to update your records.

 

Thank you for your anticipated co-operation.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Administration Team

 

 

Please do not reply to this email, emails will not be monitored."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hobo,

 

I suggest you simply ignore this email and wait until someone sends you a written letter or demand.

 

When they do that, we'll suggest a letter in reply which will refer to the 2011 High Court ruling against AMSL. See this Sticky for more info on this - https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?320766-Ashbourne-Management-Services-Ltd-Contracts-longer-than-12-months(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Don't worry about the threat to add more admin fees as they are not enforceable.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 12/12/2018 at 9:57 AM, slick132 said:

Noted and let us know when an admin or collection Co contacts you.......

 

........ but don't reply to them until we know who it is and what they say.

 

:-)

Hey Slick,

I got this in the post today... Advice welcome. I presume ignore and keep a log?

20190301_123029.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

A dca is not a bailiff and have ZERO LEGAL powers on any debt

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you send a letter to reply as follows :-

Dear sir or madam,

I refer to your demand for £345.00 which will not be paid.

The 2011 High Court ruling made by Mr Justice Kitchen in the case of The OFT v Ashbourne Mgt Services Ltd made it very clear that a 3 year membership agreement is not enforceable and that is why I cancelled the DD mandate without notice.

If you make further demands in this matter, a formal complaint will be made against DFC and the gym.

Yours faithfully

Get a free Cert of Posting at the PO when you send this.

Keep us posted. 😎

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and thanks for confirming your username has nothing to do with your real name 👍

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

social embarrassment always works.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hobo,

 

I suggest you post on their FB Page and Twitter that their 3 year m/ship is no longer reasonable after the High Court Case of The OFT V AMSL in 2011 where any gym m/ship longer than 12 months was deemed unreasonable and unenforceable.

For the Tweet, you could shorten it to, "Gym m/ships over 12 months - not enforceable per High Court case against AMSL in 2011"

😎

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Hobo,

 

I suggest their interpretation of the AMSL case and Ruling is wrong and you could reply as follows :-

 

Dear sir or madam,

 

I refer to your letter of 28th March.

 

I disagree with your interpretation of the High Court ruling in 2011 and will not make any further payment to you but may report further demands to the relevant authorities due to you continuing to offer 3 year contracts.

 

Yours faithfully,

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...