Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JD Gyms Direct Debit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 162 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning all, 

 

Hope this is the right place to post this. We were members of JD gyms for 2 years, in September we moved and i emailed them to say i wish to cancel, they "auto confirmed" receipt of my email and said it was being dealt with, 14 working days later they said they needed more information to cancel my memberships (I pay for my wifes too). I never saw the email as it went to junk. 

Fast forward to yesterday and i noticed the DD was still being taken, £40 in October and another £40 yesterday, so i called JD to inform them and explained i havent even used the gym in months and they said it doesn't matter as my initial email contained insufficient information to identify my membership and as i didn't reply in October they can continue to take money from my account. In addition, they don't make it easy to cancel as it can only be done online and it takes 14 days to get a response. 

Im guessing i have to chalk this up to experience but is it possible to ask the bank to reverse the previous DDs and let JD come after for it, or am I in the wrong now? 

 

Thank you 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Nicky, they emailed me just now to say 

"Whilst I understand any frustration you have, we require a specific amount of information which is a members responsibility to provide upon submitting a query via the online form. This is so we can pass your request through GDPR and also to locate the correct membership. 
In the query which you created, we did not have the sufficient/correct information to locate and verify your membership. We also had minimal information for the second membership you wished to cancel. Therefore, we responded to you to request further information to help us locate your membership and action your request. As we received no response, we were unable to action the request. 
 

I understand you may not have accessed the gym during this time. Unfortunately, as per our Terms and Conditions which were agreed to upon the sign-up of your membership that state: "We will continue to debit all Monthly Fees even if you do not attend the Branch." we are unable to refund your membership for the reason that you have not used the facilities."

If i request a refund for the DDs, i just want to make sure any further action wouldn't effect my credit rating, particularly as for my job i have to be squeaky clean? Secondly would i be able to request a refund for October and November? Or just November

Thanks again for your time, really appreciated 

 
 
Edited by PeterParker121
Link to post
Share on other sites

get all the dd's back but allow them one payment after you told them to cancel

sadly its down to you to cancel the dd.

go do a dd guarantee clawback to your bank.

if anyone chases you ignore them

gym debts dont appear on credit files and any dca sent to chase you are not bailiffs and never can be on any debt...they are powerless!

 

dx 

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, PeterParker121 said:

If i request a refund for the DDs, i just want to make sure any further action wouldn't effect my credit rating, particularly as for my job i have to be squeaky clean?

Any "Further action" could only be a court claim and I believe on CAG, there have only ever been one or two claims threatened, but never followed up. (Mainly because they know they'd lose).

A CCJ (sounds frightening doesn't it?) is only issued for people who defy court orders to pay money...

IF IF IF it ever got to court (highly unlikely), you would need to lose (highly unlikely) and then defy the court by not paying (which obviously, you wouldn't). Only then would you get a CCJ, which would obviously affect your credit.

A CCJ would never affect employment. It is NOT a criminal record, so wouldn't show up on checks.

 

Sorry, crossposted with dx, but you get the general idea...

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PP,

Did you give them enough info to identify you and your wife? 

In any event, reclaim the DD's via your bank as suggested allowing for one last payment to the gym after you gave notice. So if you gave notice to quit in September, they should have the October payment but reclaim the November fee via your bank.

Also, make sure you give the gym your new address so you know what they're up to.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 15/11/2023 at 11:55, Nicky Boy said:

A CCJ would never affect employment. It is NOT a criminal record, so wouldn't show up on checks.

that's not entirely true, if you work in the financial industry or for some gov't agencies a CCJ is a death sentence to your job and must be declared even if their checks like DBS enhanced DBS wont show them.

however, since the infamous ashbourne case NO gyms have done court for low level low £'s 'fake debts'.

there are 2 cases here at present whereby David LLoyd via Moriarty law HAVE issue court claims for sums close to £1000 in back supposed membership, though i believe neither has progressed since defence filing and are close if not already stayed.

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...