Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Left leisure leagues, now want money from me


gg123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I signed up to lesuire leagues( football leagues 5aside)

when signing up you had to accept t&c to sign up, as most people you click them regardless.

A friend then said lets make a team, so we did however nothing came up, no agreement or anything.

 

A day later they called saying we have a game in one week, and if we wanna leave the league we have to give 2 weeks notice which is the first time hearing this or seeing.

 

Tuesday is the games, monday comes and players have dropped out and no longer can make it due to work family etc, 

 

I just called them up and decided to withdraw us from the league, in the t&c it does say we must give 2 weeks notice to leave the league if not we have to pay the 2 weeks games which is £64,

 

i left and the debt collectors sent me an email saying i owe £64 then something about something and then ill owe £240.

 

ive seen a few of these situations and they all just say ignore. should i?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Left leisure leagues, now want money from me

yep everything.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

same as soccer sixes

go read their threads here

 

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read them all but never really heard any actual outcomes but im assuming they were never successful in getting the money. ill ignore them and come back in a few months or so to update for anyone with same issues from these lows

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah exactly, i intend on ignoring it all until the police come knocking, cause its just a joke, i didnt even begin the league, just signed up, will update soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

police?

since when have they ever been involved in debt collection....:pound:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

phone calls are not admissible evidence.

 

forget it 

go enjoy your life

 

and READ the soccer sixes threads.

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right !

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool,

update is they resent me the same email they sent me a week ago,

i asked for it on the same day as i deleted it and then decided i wanted to read it.

 

but just sent me the same email,

im assuming when they said they were going to pass it over to their debt recovery team, they meant a different department of the company instead of an actual agency which is probably the exact same people then i spoke to on the phone, or maybe im wrong, regardless, will continue to ignore will update again within a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA's are not bailiffs and have zero legal powers.

 

ignore everything

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update, no letters as of yet and no email since a week ago. I'm not concerned obviously when it first happened i was worried but a week later i realised how stupid it is, will keep updating for others incase they end up with the same problem from these weirdos

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GG,

 

Glad to hear it's been quiet.

 

Let's hope it stays that way but, if they pester you again, ignore and let us know.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nevermind I have another email saying I have another 7 days and that if i dont pay it will be sent to debt agency which i know have no powers, but then they said it will also effect my credit rating which i was told it wouldnt

 

im assuming its just a threat to encourage me to pay, i can copy and paste the email if you guys want however i will continue to ignore them, i guess cause its written quite formal with legal words it seems a little worrying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why they write it the way they do - so you feel threatened.

 

But it's just hot air and this cannot affect your credit rating  unless they took you to court, which they don't !!

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the email it said because i accepted terms and conditions its legally binding contract,

 

i received no products or services from them so it makes no sense for me to owe them money cause i left the league and never began playing :D

 

i know it wont go court obviously, regardless will continue to ignore but are we 100 percent sure it cant effect credit,

 

considering i never accepted nor signed some sort of credit agreement or direct debit and again never received services or products from them

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to repeat what's been said already ! 😉

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok sir i will continue to ignore and continue to update for others

 

sorry :D

 

the reason i thought it might effect credit is because you dont need to go court for it to effect credit as my sister hadnt paid a store for her purchases and then later was on her credit report and she never went court, or is this something completely different 

 

i never signed credit agreement or received any products,

sorry i just have anxiety and worry even though i know i shouldnt

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a High Court ruling in 2011 which barred gyms from damaging credit ratings to force consumers to pay gym fees and penalty fees. The case was taken against AMSL Ltd but the ruling set a precedent which applies to similar m/ships.

 

It was a game-changer and since the ruling gym contracts have not been reported to CRA's.

 

See here - https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/250816-office-of-fair-trading-v-ashbourne-management-services-9thmarch-2011/

 

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...