Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Just received a letter from Lowell's - Three mobile account


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2189 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello.

i am in the same situation.

 

i have received more letters from lowell saying that i owe them money for a debt from Three mobile account.

 

i have sent them the prove it letter.

 

i received shortly an automated email from them:

 

Thank you for your email dated 4/6/2018

 

Many customers are now getting the information and support they need on our new customer website at ( their website)

 

Click this link ( their website to register) to register and you'll be able to review your account(s), check your budget, set up affordable repayment plans or make one-off payments.

 

We aim to respond to your email within 48 hours but, if we are very busy it may take a little longer.

 

What should i do if i do not receive an answear from them?

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Own thread created...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well don't be scared of them

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and have

ZERO LEGAL POWERS..

 

so you had an old 3 account?

what happened?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they answered to my prove it letter email by this

 

Dear name

 

Thanks for your email.

Authorising this email adress

 

As we don’t have confirmation that this email address is for you, we’d be grateful if you could confirm the following for security purposes:

 

·Your date of birth.

·Your current address, including your postcode.

 

If you’d prefer, you can confirm this email address by registeringon our secure customer website at 9their web site)or by calling our team on their phone.

 

If the security checks are not completed, I’ll be unable to continue corresponding by e-mail.

 

Should i send them those details? i do not feel safe to do that because they might start harassing meby email, phone or come to my house. but if i do not send them the details how can they prove that debt( although they have the account number and reference number which should be more thn enough). i am trying to avoid reistering on their website site cause it might be a [problem] to get access to my details and use it to thier purposes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I pers would never give them my email.

 

so you had an old 3 account?

what happened?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is my fiance's account. he had a phone from them but returned back because they did not have reception.

he doesn;t have the old contract.

 

he remembers paying for the time he used it...but i can;t say what kind of contract it was...for data...for phone or both.

 

if they would give me some proof that he has to pay those money according to that contract he signed it, i would pay it.

but i do not have any information detailed

Link to post
Share on other sites

who says you've got to pay anything..certainly not to a no powers DCA!!

 

Subject to the above, should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the total balance of the remaining contract, OFCOM guidance clearly states that any Early Termination Charge, that is made up of the entire balance of the remaining contract, is unlikely to be fair, as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d be tempted to reply “if you aren’t sure it is me, you can’t be sure it is my debt - and I deny any responsibility from the details you have given. When you are sure it is my debt please supply the details, and at that point I can re-assess the situation”.

 

Alternatively write to me with details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I most certainly wouldn't be funding this circus outfit, you need to block their email, mark it as junk and keep bouncing it back.

 

Check your credit files, and see if there's anything on there.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d be tempted to reply “if you aren’t sure it is me, you can’t be sure it is my debt - and I deny any responsibility from the details you have given. When you are sure it is my debt please supply the details, and at that point I can re-assess the situation”.

 

Alternatively write to me with details.

 

Hello again! I have sent them back exactly that. Their answer was

Good afternoon,

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

I understand you’re concerned about providing personal information by email.

 

Protecting your personal account information

 

However, under the Data Protection Act we’re unable to disclose any information, or act upon any requests, until security checks have been completed. This is just to ensure we are not disclosing information to anyone other than our customer.

 

If you’d like to discuss this account by email, please provide the following:

 

Your date of birth.

Your current address, including your postcode.

 

It is like a game:You first! No, you first!

Thanks

 

I do not know how to check my credit files. I never had loans, mortgages or overdrafts.

Edited by dx100uk
merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

So, write to them.

Don’t provide any new information, but enclose a copy of their original letter, and copies of the e-mails.

 

Stress again you cannot be sure if the account is yours, so for now cannot accept responsibility for it. Require them to prove it is yours, rather than assuming it is. Point out that if they again say “data protection” and they aren’t sure you are the account holder they shouldn’t be asking you to pay, and if they are sure you are the account holder they should :

a) be able to prove it, and

b) be able to send you your own personal information without breaching data protection.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No DON'T write to them!

 

STOP playing letter tennis.

 

Ignore them, and if they think, in their tinyminds, that they have their intended target then they'll write to you.

 

STOP rattling their cage.

 

Checking your credit files is easy, use Noddle, or experian, which is free.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the moment they can ignore the OP's email, by claiming anyone could have sent it.

IF the OP has sent the 'prove it' letter by email they need to send it by post.

If, instead, the OP has sent it by post, then I agree : no more letters needed for now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The point being, playing letter tennis is pointless.

 

Emailing them even more so.

 

So STOP corresponding with them, or you risk them creating a debt with your name on it.

 

Never EVER correspond with DCA's via email, only ever use 'snail mail' so you have a paper trail of evidence.

 

Check your credit files before inviting them to harass you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

has your fiancé moved since taking this contract out?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
they answered to my prove it letter email by this

 

Dear name

 

Thanks for your email.

Authorising this email adress

 

As we don’t have confirmation that this email address is for you, we’d be grateful if you could confirm the following for security purposes:

 

·Your date of birth.

·Your current address, including your postcode.

 

If you’d prefer, you can confirm this email address by registeringon our secure customer website at 9their web site)or by calling our team on their phone.

 

If the security checks are not completed, I’ll be unable to continue corresponding by e-mail.

 

Should i send them those details? i do not feel safe to do that because they might start harassing meby email, phone or come to my house. but if i do not send them the details how can they prove that debt( although they have the account number and reference number which should be more thn enough). i am trying to avoid reistering on their website site cause it might be a [problem] to get access to my details and use it to thier purposes.

 

 

I'd caution against giving information for reasons I can't go into.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...