Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Demand for 1st £50 payment on Unknown Lowell Cap1 CCJ - thought i paid this off by F+F years ago


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2535 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Howdy,

 

I have a situation that I would really appreciate some input on.

 

Recently Lowell contacted me for a debt I thought i had paid off in 2008.

It was as credit card that I took out as a student.

I had no previous contact from lowell until earlier this year.

 

I received three letters demanding a sum of money and ignored them.

I then received a pre court letter.

When i contacted them they said the only way to prevent a cci was to set up a token payment plan

in the meantime and they would provide me with proof of the debt.

 

 

They told me to disregard the court letter.

I agreed and set up the plan.

 

 

The evidence i asked for didn't appear and i cancelled my direct debit before any payments were taken and then called them to ask whats going on and

they said they were still waiting to hear back from the original debtor.

 

A couple of weeks went by and then i received a letter from the court saying that a CCJ has been made.

 

 

I have now received a letter from Lowell saying that they do not have any copies of original agreement etc and the debtor doesn't have them either.

 

What can I do in this situation?

I understand that once a ccj has been made there is not much one can do as even though its an unenforceable debt it has already been enforced but can they really demand the money without any evidence I still owe it?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a lot you can do.

 

However, I should start off by saying that although you seem to have been conducting your communications with them on the phone, I suppose that you haven't recorded anything so you have no evidence.

 

Anyway, you should apply for set-aside. Please follow the set-aside link to discover how to do this. In your circumstances it will be very straightforward although there will be a fee to pay. I would say that in the set-aside application you should ask that the fee be paid by the claimant because you have clear evidence that they have no copy of the CCA and therefore the alleged debt was unenforceable anyway and they knew that it was unenforceable.

 

In future, please record your calls. Read our customer services guide and implement the advice there. Also, you are best off not ignoring correspondence unless you know what you're doing. Come here for advice before you decide to respond to anything – or before you decide not to respond to anything.

 

However, never ever deal with anyone on the phone unless you are recording the call. Read our customer services guide

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial legal Issues..please continue to post here to your thread.

 

They told me to disregard the court letter. I agreed and set up the plan.

 

By letter you mean a court claim pack from Northampton CCBC ?

 

Andy

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your awesomely fast reply.

 

Yes indeed it was all conducted via telephone - when i call them they do seem to have very detailed notes - would it be worth asking for a Subject Access Request?

 

The letter they sent me (along with a letter demanding first payment of cci awarded amount) is as follows:

 

"Please note we are unable to provide you with a copy of the agreement from the original creditor Capital One.

 

We can confirm the original account was taken out on 13th February 2008.

The account defaulted at a balance of £659.17 and the last payment was for £83.42 on 7 october 2011.

 

Due to non-payment a county court judgement was entered against you on 18th May 2017 and you are currently in arrears of £50.

 

... payment details etc etc etc"

 

I also queried the payment that they say i made that I have no recollection of nor can find in any of my accounts

- it seemed conveniently to be just within the 6 year window

- im not sure why I would make a payment out of the blue years after the fact and feel this payment log might be bogus.

 

This debt had been handed between 4 or 5 collectors and back in the time i made a payment that I understood to be a full and final settlement but I cannot find any evidence to show that I paid it as I didn't keep anything older than 6 years.

 

I will ask for it to be set aside and thank you for the advice. I will make sure I only telephone whilst recording in future,

 

All the best and my sincerest thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest the DCA you made the F&F too was just another trading name of lowells?

can yo not SAR your bank

get all the statements and find that payment?

 

 

before you rush and pay £255 to set it aside?

 

 

if you can prove you F&F'd, then they might well set aside by consent at no cost to you?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...