Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • absolute rubbish, whomever told you that lied to make them sound important. no stores are using face recognition, they are not allowed too it's not been generally licenced by the gov't. it's only in a very few stores in central london. and they most certainly would never waste staff time searching old CCTV they dont even have. it should be wiped by GDPR laws etc after 30days. if you get any silly letters BIN THEM. go see your GP ASAP 
    • Thank you both so much for the reply. I am worried because they told me they have face detection systems in place, that they go back through the CCTV from their other stores and find out I've shoplifted from them before. How likely is this? Also they did not mention anything about DWF solicitors or retail loss prevention. Should I still expect a letter from them? 
    • OK, I've found some time, new version here. Bit in blue that seems to me to be superfluous - but you decide. Crossed out bit where the law has changed. Added bits in red. Only one bit rewritten for clarity in magenta. Here are the two exhibits I mention. That's enough playing with colours by me 🤣   Defendant's WS - version 3.pdf 17_extracted_IPC Code of PracticeV9 V4.pdf Transcript - Excel v Wilkinson.pdf
    • Five fiercest moments from Penny Mordaunt and Angela Rayner’s blazing TV debate leaving Farage a sideshow Nigel Farage and Stephen Flynn were the sideshow as the largest parties fought it out Five fiercest moments from Penny Mordaunt and Angela Rayner’s blazing TV debate – leaving Nigel Farage a sideshow – The Sun | The Sun WWW.THESUN.CO.UK ANGELA Rayner and Penny Mordaunt launched into several fierce clashes in their debate last night.Their tense rows included divides...  
    • Shorter than sunak visit eh?   Nigel Farage dunked on Sunak’s D-Day exit – and this response deserves a medal WWW.THEPOKE.COM Reform leader Farage criticised PM Rishi Sunak for leaving the D-Day anniversary events in order to film a TV interview - and writer Rick... Watch: Nigel Farage has drink thrown over him WWW.BBC.CO.UK The new Reform UK leader was leaving a pub where he had been meeting voters in Clacton.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

beresd v HSBC


beresd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6297 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ready to file your aq? just checking on all my little chicks.

 

Evening! I am indeed, although not heard owt from DG, so will give them a call in the AM...

 

will keep you posted Lareralus...

 

S

24/10/2006 - sent Stage 1 DATA PROTECTION letter to HSBC

12/11/06 - Recieved 6 years of statements, 8 months worth twice!

17/11/06 - Sent Prelim approach letter

19/12/06 - Submitted LBA by hand and post.

03/01/07 - Recieved lame response to LBA dated 28th dec 06

11/01/07 - Called QT to enquire what they were doing, nothing, so submitted MCOL for 2703.86

16/01/07 - got a partial offer for £1926

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

have you seen netty's thread last night- i've got a list of 11 aq's due this weekend - just want to make sure no one is struggling with the paperwork.

fingers crossed for a last minute offer - they routinely send out offers just before or after the aq is due - not always but enough for me to say watch the post - and yes, give them a call...........good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys, well, sent of the AQ, so fingers crossed. Considering I sent my innitial letters out in October, this has taken a while! but hey ho...might call DG again to see what they are playing at and why they are dragging their heels.

24/10/2006 - sent Stage 1 DATA PROTECTION letter to HSBC

12/11/06 - Recieved 6 years of statements, 8 months worth twice!

17/11/06 - Sent Prelim approach letter

19/12/06 - Submitted LBA by hand and post.

03/01/07 - Recieved lame response to LBA dated 28th dec 06

11/01/07 - Called QT to enquire what they were doing, nothing, so submitted MCOL for 2703.86

16/01/07 - got a partial offer for £1926

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's three big full offers today - that should be very, very encouraging to you.

yes, ring them and tell them it will now cost another 100 to settle as you have filed your aq.

netty absolutely bombarded them with e-mails - they are probably glad to see the back of her - couldn't hurt!!!

 

keep in touch - i'll be along with more advice for you guys who filed after the weekend. but for now - bug dg!

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep going beres. 'tip of the day'.... send an email to one person and copy the rest, the change the names round and copy the rest etc etc lol

boy they were glad to get rid of me - the whole building has been decorated in my emails - all 12 floors!!!

fingers crossed for a visit from the postman tomorrow xxxxxx

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one guys, I am always last to be picked for the team :-(

 

;-)

 

OK, I will email them, Netty, sent you a PM

 

Sim

24/10/2006 - sent Stage 1 DATA PROTECTION letter to HSBC

12/11/06 - Recieved 6 years of statements, 8 months worth twice!

17/11/06 - Sent Prelim approach letter

19/12/06 - Submitted LBA by hand and post.

03/01/07 - Recieved lame response to LBA dated 28th dec 06

11/01/07 - Called QT to enquire what they were doing, nothing, so submitted MCOL for 2703.86

16/01/07 - got a partial offer for £1926

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fooking DG, had one call off Kate on Friday basically saying, 'if I am to get an offer I will get one in the post, stop calling' I asked why others had got one but I was being treated differently...no answer, so I called on the hour every hour yesterday, no answers or replies ot my messages...any ideas guys?

 

Sim

24/10/2006 - sent Stage 1 DATA PROTECTION letter to HSBC

12/11/06 - Recieved 6 years of statements, 8 months worth twice!

17/11/06 - Sent Prelim approach letter

19/12/06 - Submitted LBA by hand and post.

03/01/07 - Recieved lame response to LBA dated 28th dec 06

11/01/07 - Called QT to enquire what they were doing, nothing, so submitted MCOL for 2703.86

16/01/07 - got a partial offer for £1926

Link to post
Share on other sites

and now it turns out that Barnet (where my case was transfered to from Northampton) has transfered it to Shoreditch, AAAAARRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

 

is it wrong to ring and email on the hour every hour?

24/10/2006 - sent Stage 1 DATA PROTECTION letter to HSBC

12/11/06 - Recieved 6 years of statements, 8 months worth twice!

17/11/06 - Sent Prelim approach letter

19/12/06 - Submitted LBA by hand and post.

03/01/07 - Recieved lame response to LBA dated 28th dec 06

11/01/07 - Called QT to enquire what they were doing, nothing, so submitted MCOL for 2703.86

16/01/07 - got a partial offer for £1926

Link to post
Share on other sites

aye, London...

 

why thank you!

24/10/2006 - sent Stage 1 DATA PROTECTION letter to HSBC

12/11/06 - Recieved 6 years of statements, 8 months worth twice!

17/11/06 - Sent Prelim approach letter

19/12/06 - Submitted LBA by hand and post.

03/01/07 - Recieved lame response to LBA dated 28th dec 06

11/01/07 - Called QT to enquire what they were doing, nothing, so submitted MCOL for 2703.86

16/01/07 - got a partial offer for £1926

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, a back dated letter emailed from Rachel, but short the extra 100 pounds plus registered postage costs and phone calls chasing up the claim...do I just ask for it to be added on?

24/10/2006 - sent Stage 1 DATA PROTECTION letter to HSBC

12/11/06 - Recieved 6 years of statements, 8 months worth twice!

17/11/06 - Sent Prelim approach letter

19/12/06 - Submitted LBA by hand and post.

03/01/07 - Recieved lame response to LBA dated 28th dec 06

11/01/07 - Called QT to enquire what they were doing, nothing, so submitted MCOL for 2703.86

16/01/07 - got a partial offer for £1926

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, well, I just print out that letter and send it back with an extra note regarding the other £100...why didn't they just say that on Friday?!

24/10/2006 - sent Stage 1 DATA PROTECTION letter to HSBC

12/11/06 - Recieved 6 years of statements, 8 months worth twice!

17/11/06 - Sent Prelim approach letter

19/12/06 - Submitted LBA by hand and post.

03/01/07 - Recieved lame response to LBA dated 28th dec 06

11/01/07 - Called QT to enquire what they were doing, nothing, so submitted MCOL for 2703.86

16/01/07 - got a partial offer for £1926

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know netty! I was just being as pedantic as they were...but tbh, I bet they charge their clients postage costs, I know my solicitor has charged me before! anyway, looks like the saga may be coming to an end...

24/10/2006 - sent Stage 1 DATA PROTECTION letter to HSBC

12/11/06 - Recieved 6 years of statements, 8 months worth twice!

17/11/06 - Sent Prelim approach letter

19/12/06 - Submitted LBA by hand and post.

03/01/07 - Recieved lame response to LBA dated 28th dec 06

11/01/07 - Called QT to enquire what they were doing, nothing, so submitted MCOL for 2703.86

16/01/07 - got a partial offer for £1926

Link to post
Share on other sites

so, are you saying you've got an offer for all but the 100 aq cost? that's fantastic - if that's what you are saying -

there is a letter in the success thread - michael browne wrote it for vicmar - look for her thread - hang on:

 

Date

Dear Whoever

Ref: Your Offer of Settlement

 

Account: xxxxxxxx

Sort Code xx-xx-xx

Claim No: XXXXX in XXXX County Court

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter date xx/xx/xx and your settlement offer of £XXX

 

Unfortunately your offer has failed to include my allocation fee of £100 and therefore I am unable to accept your offer as full and final settlement until you agree to refund this amount. The total amount I wish to be refunded is £XXXXX

 

As soon as I receive confirmation from you that you agree to this increased figure I will accept the new offer without prejudice and I reserve the right to make any further claims should you apply future charges that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim of £XXX

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentially clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I look forward to receiving your revised offer

Yours Sincerely

__________________

 

how's that: - just tweak what you need to. you could put those extras in for the confidentiality consideration - or not - i think it's a bit tongue-in-cheek - but heck - you do what you like! keep in touch. i hope i'm reading your posts right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...