Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left a trustpilot review and P2g have emailed me with the obligatory apology and have refunded the postage costs and are will to give £10 extra pre pay as a good will gesture. However,  as i wrote this the Buyer has just txt.me.to say they have received the parcel !  So obviously im now going.to suggest that she pays via Paypal ... I rang her this morning to see if it had arrived but she said she was on holiday and there was someone in her house she would have to contact to see if it had arrived which she obviously has ... So now i know its been delivered i cant go for P2g But i Can accept the exta £10 ...
    • The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go.com Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper via the Defendant's service containing which contained two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with  under  tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was The Defendant informed me that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks I was informed by the courier that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. The Claimant did not purchase the Defendant's insurance policy as requiring people to pay extra for rights already guaranteed under the consumer rights act 2015 is contrary to section 57 and 72 and therefore unenforceable. The Claimant rejected the Defendant's standard compensation offer. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   By failing to ensure the safe delivery of the Claimant's parcel the Defendant breached section 49 of the CRA 2015.   AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS £370.00 being the value of the lost goods £xx.xx being the price of shipping and interest pursuant to s69 cca 1984.   See what BF thinks but I think something like this is better. Remember you are suing P2G not evri.
    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

'Free' Phone from 3G - Spam Voice Calls


buzby
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4010 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've just spent an interesting 15 minutes speaking to an Indian call centre that was trying to give me a free phone if I signed up to the UKs "3G" network. After the puff - much of it unintelligible - I asked which network the phone would be connected to.... "3G" I said that was a technology - what was the network....? I was eventually transferred to a supervisort who first told me that he was "3G", and when I pressed him further he corrected himself and said he was calling from "3UK", which - he wanted me to know, had a call centre in India. I explained I did know this, but it was surprising he didn't know me as I was already a 3UK customer, on a contract. As the fractured conversation developed, it turned out they weren't 3UK, simply a sales boilerhouse trying to get customers to sign up for a free phone.

 

Additionally, the call came through on a line that has TPS opt-out for sales calls, and when I queried why I was called, he told me they had a 'computer system' that made the calls, so they weren't responsible - and their computer didn't know or take notice of marketing blocked numbers! On asking him for his contact details, I was told he didn't know his own phone number, before terminating the call (the call comes in as 'International').

 

I'll be raising this with 3UK, as they'll be able to whittle down who in India can sell their contracts, but interestingly the call centre contacted my number 7 time in a DAY until they connected with someone. If YOU get a similar call ofering to sign you up to the "3G" network - try and find out who they are.

 

I'll be banging on 3UK's Glasgow HQ door first thing tomorrow for some answers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They were all out having a curry? :) I contacted their Data Compliance Officer by email asking for disclosure of the name or names of the firms they use as sales agents in India to sell to the UK. If they provide this, I'll send the info to the ICO as a formal complaint. If 3 decline, I'll take this as their tacit acceptance of these methods and complain with them as the 'notifiable party' in knowing of the problem and condonig it. More when I hear back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Three have responded, saying that they 'weeded out' errant call centres and this practice was at an end - then were unimpressed to discover that the sales calls complained of were within the last month, some 4 months after the 'cull'. 3UK provided the following information;

 

Minimum requirements for outbound or inbound telephone sales activities.

D10_image.asp?sid=386701701&did=2006112835914&em=2285 In July 2005 we issued a compliance bulletin advising of problems arising from unsolicited marketing calls being made by some 3Sellers.

Unfortunately, 3 continues to receive complaints from customers and members of the public about unsolicited marketing calls being made by 3Sellers. We also understand that some 3Sellers are passing themselves off as being from ‘3’ and/or refuse to identify themselves.

This is a matter that 3 takes very seriously and we cannot permit the above behaviour to continue. 3 is committed to the highest business and compliance standards and we expect all 3Sellers to comply with their legal obligations including under the UK Data Protection Act 1998, the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, the Communications Act 2003, the Distance Selling Regulations 2000 and all other applicable laws, when promoting and selling 3’s services. A breach of the law by a 3Seller is a breach of your agreement with 3 and we will take appropriate action, including the suspension of sales and the termination of agreements, where breaches are found.

We have produced a minimum requirements document for all 3Sellers conducting outbound or inbound telephone sales activities (see below). We expect for these requirements to be followed and non-compliance is likely to be considered a breach of relevant data protection laws. We have consulted with the Information Commissioner’s office (ICO) on the ‘minimum requirements’ and which they support. The ICO are stepping up enforcement activity in this area, and recently issued preliminary enforcement notices against a number of organisations (including mobile retailers) for making unsolicited marketing calls in breach of the PECRS.

Click here to download the requirements document from 3Seller Central now.

 

You should also be aware that all 3Sellers must obtain the prior written agreement of 3 to the use of call centres outside of the UK. Therefore all 3Sellers must immediately notify 3 of any marketing calls and of any processing of applications being made by them from or to countries outside of the UK and provide full details of these activities by completing the form attached.

 

They have also indicated they might disclose the details of those firms abroad they accept connections from - if I receive this information, I'll advise later in this thread. In the meantime, if you get call like this, either supposedly from '3' or '3G' - do let me know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im on O2 and used to get these a lot one cheeky git tried chatting me up to keep me on the line:confused: all I do now is ask how the hell they got my number as its unlisted they usually hang up instantly. The way I see it too you usually know its a sales call instantly so I tell them if they are trying to sell or get me to sign up to anything then just bog off now! Wonder why ive not had any calls in agges:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

My ex had this problem. Someone from '3' called her and tried selling her an upgrade so she took it and they told her they would let her cancel the contract and keep the new phone so she thought she would be able to sell the new phone online, they sent her all kinds of bills so i called them and they also said they were '3G' and again i said no your not so what is your real name, i did get it and also their address but then when i called 3 i got through to india and they got really confused. She got out of it but had to pay some line rental in the end.... thing is that the phone she had wasn't even in her name and all the security info she gave was false ie it was all in her mums name and she gave her details and they said "oh thank you we have now identified you" lol they obviously just wanted her details.

 

I can't believe they are allowed to do that though!

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When they called, did they say they were O2... or was it just a general sales call saying they thought it time you upgraded your phone?

 

Nope always summit to do with 3 we also get these leeches at the door and just close it in their faces!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My ex had this problem.

 

According to 3, this 'problem' resolved itself early this year with the last of the 'cull' of errant dealers supposedly being removed. My complaint, of this happening within the last month caused some annoyance, but they've not provided a list of firms in the sub-continent still authorised to sell for 3 (or even the number of firms, if the trading names are 'sensitive').

 

Due to the lack of candour from 3, I'm drafting a formal complaint to the Information Commissioner, as on the face of things being abroad makes them immune to TPS rules, but the connection with 3UK (to my mind) re-establishes it with a vengeance.

 

I'll keep the thread posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats great. I can't see how they can get away with it. Im on PAYGO and i think i had one of these not so long ago but i just put the phone down, really annoying that they keep on and on at people.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This company 3 are a weird lot .I've had a contract with them for the last 3yrs. when i upgraded in August this year iwas given an 18month contract which am regretting. I was late to pay their bill by 1 week an indian calls me n tells me as i didn't have the money as it was not payday yet i just give them my credit card details even though i told them it had no money, the guy said it doesn't matter i just give out the details. I smelled a fish and told him off after which he threatened to put a default against my name. Iwas fuming iput down the phone and the next day they disconnected my line including calling the customer services which is free from your handset. I lost a job as they had also disconnected my incoming calls. Itried calling customer services but they kept hanging up on me untill i told them iwanted to cancel the contract on this they stayed on the phone and rudely asked me to pay the full line rental and they gave me figure of about £600. I asked how they calculated this and they said its £1.50 a day. so until2008 feb, if i calculate the amount it doesn't come to £600 unless he was doing it in Rupees. Thing is is there any thing ican do or can the OFCOM help in anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, OFCOM doesn't represent consumers so it'll comse as no surprise that they're a waste of space. From what you explain, you took out an 18month contract 4 months ago, and you had 14 months of the contract to run. You couldn't pay the bill, and when they called you for an altrernative payment method you told them you couldn't afford it. You then asked them or told them to remove service and your line was disconnected. THey now want you to pay the balance of the contract.

 

Well, so far its you at fault for not sticking to your agreement. You can''t simply say "I can't afford it" and stop paying. They supplied you with a discounted (or free) phone, based on your promise of stating with them for 18 months.

 

I can't comment on how much it is 'a day' as they don't bill daily, it'll be whatever your monthly tariff was, for the remainder of ther months left to go. It is much better value to pay, as they'll reinstate your mobile and you can start usiing your inclusive call allowance. However they have probably noted you are in default and passing the matter to credit recovery agents to get their money back. The best thing is to offer 3 something to get you back on track, and before your credit records get wrecked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

The best 2 replies I ever heard to these scenarios were:

1) a firm "guaranteeing to beat your current tariff", to which the respondent replied "how much you going to pay me then?"

He was the editor of What Mobile?, and noted he was on a a "Press tariff, unlimited, no fees" : so if they were to better it, how much would they give him per month?

 

2) the firm "calling from Orange" who thought they had a gull up until they asked him for his postcode : which he gave for his office : the Chief Engineer for Orange (at Patchway).

 

Moral : for us mere mortals who can't catch them out by already being on unbeatable tariffs : they may say they are calling from the network, but usually aren't.

They may (if pushed) admit they are calling "on behalf of the network", but are actually calling on behalf if their commission payments.

 

if they call with an offer, listen to what they say is available, and then, if an existing customer, ask the network direct for the same or better. They'll already have your details, so caution in giving them any card / bank details.

If you aren't an existing customer, and would give you bank / card details to anyone who calls you up : let me know your number, as I can offer you a terrific upgrade

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...