Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell claimform - old Orange Mobile 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2625 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi evreyone

 

I received a letter from the the county court asking me to pay £471 to lowell who bought the debt from orange!

if i dont a judgement may be entered against me...

 

Back to june 2013 i went back home for 15 days

when i came back to London i received an orange bill of over £200,

i called them asking why the bill is higher then usual,

they said i used roaming !!!

 

before flying to my distination i called orange to ask for the roaming prices abroad and because was expensive i didnt take it so i used the wifi .

 

I refused to pay the extra for something i havent used,

they offered me to pay half of the bill but i insisted to pay only my monthly bill as was on the agreement.

 

i called orange costumer service again because they discounted me from makjng calls explianed them again that j will pay only the monthly as we agreed and i requested a call back from a manager but the call didnt come for next 6 days so i switch to an other network!

 

Please any suggestion as i checked my credit score today was 2/5 !

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

I've moved this thread to our Financial Legal Issues Forum, you should get some help shortly.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean you have a letter

you mean a claimform?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you fill this link out please

copy the Q's and your responses and post them back here for further advice.

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ?lowell portfolio 1 ltd

 

Date of issue – 16/03/2017

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The claimants claim is for the sum of £357 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a mobile telecoms agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 between the defendant and EE limited under acc ref .......and assigned to the claimant on 27/6/2013 notice of which has been given to the defendant

 

2.The defendant failed to maintain the payment under the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served and not complied with

 

3.The claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county courticon act 1984 at rate of %8 per annum a daily rate of £0.08 from the date of Assignment of the agreement to 27/06/2014 being an amount of £29.28

 

What is the value of the claim?£357 increased to £471 after interest

 

Is the claim for a current account (Overdraft) or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? Mobile phone

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007?after 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. The debt purchaser who has issued the claim

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? As far as i know no

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? As far as i know no i never heared of lowelll till i received the county court claim form

 

Why did you cease payments? Dont want to pay for something i havent used

What was the date of your last payment?April or May 2013

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes over the higher bill

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? No

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that verbatim their particulars of claim ?

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? The claimant claim is due failed to maintain the payment under a mobile telecom agreement " orange mobile "

 

No account number no reference to the debt being assigned...no sec 69 interest calculation ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pariculars of claim :

The claimant claim is for the sum of £357 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a mobile telecoms agrreeemwnt regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 between the defendant and evreyyhjng evreywhere limited under acc ref .......and assigned to the claimant on 27/6/2013 notice of which has been given to the defendant

The defendant failed to maintain the payment under the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served and not complied with

The claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the county court act 1984 at rate of %8 per annum a daily rate of £0.08 from the date of Assignment of the agreement to 27/06/2014 being an amount of £29.28

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Adel

 

Its vital we have every word of the claimants pleadings down to the last full stop...if you shorten it your defence will be incorrect.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow the instructions contained within the claim pack and register to use MCOL so you can acknowledge service and submit your defence on line.

 

You have 19 days to A o S 16th March being day 1....if you wish to defend the matter in full state so when acknowledging the claim..you then get a further 14 days to submit your defence (33 days in total)

 

Go back to the above link that you completed and follow the instructions with regards to sending the claimant a CPR 31.14 request.

 

Once all the above is complete ..just keep your eye on your defence due date.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm the old covered by the CCA

 

 

so did you sign a credit agreement? I bet you didn't!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the POClink3.gif also says its regulated CCA

 

id be doing all below:

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimformlink3.gif.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Requestlink3.gif running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14link3.gif request running to the solicitors

.

don't signlink3.gif anything

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take a look at my thread here,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?475078-Lowell-claimform-old-T-Mobile-debt&p=5009920#post5009920

 

I'm a bit further along the process than you so you can get an idea of what may need doing. Also read other threads as there are many successful defences and it will keep you grounded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

their poc states

under a mobile telecoms agreement regulated by the consumer creditlink3.gif act 1974 between the defendant and EE limited under acc ref

wrongly states that, but use it to your advantage in your defence

as they obviously don't know what they are talking about....

 

 

as for beerme1664 user-online.png thread

that's a different poc to yours

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just to let you know that i called ofcom who advised me to call ee executive office as first step which I did today ,the lady I spoke with says the bill of £260was on September 2011 and orange sell it to lowell on July 2013, when i t old her that I requested a call back from the manager to sortout the porblem and no one called back, I was disconnected from orange network without any notice, her response was she cant do anything about it and i have to deal with lowell!

At the beginning she refused to give me any information saying that her systems can check only 2 years back till i insisted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't matter

Did you get post 13 done?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you've wasted 8 of your 33 days already

Its now another w/end so 3 more days gone

 

You now lost 1thrid of your time

 

Get that post done NOW

Post the letter off tomorrow before noon po counters are open to get the £1 po else its Monday

 

Mcol you can do now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

all in post 13.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

adel2978..

..please take time to read posts and make notes when you have read the relevant ,

 

 

one thing i found out in the early part of my case

i waited till the 11th hour to ask for advice and it was stressful

 

 

however as my case proceeds i am now on top of it and read other posts so i can prepare for any more letters etc that arrive ...

 

 

..As Andy states Knowledge is power ,

,good luck read my posts as well so you can see what is coming down the line and you are prepared

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...