Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I think his point is renewing his season ticket shows it wont happen again. using contactles doesnt.
    • Thanks dx for your guide. Yes, I will use their services, but not often. I usually spend around 80 per month, but the season ticket price is 160. I plan to renew it as long it could help me to show that I will not do it again.
    • if you are going to be using its services yes if not no. STOP PANICKING........ yours is not the next move. dx  
    • You could try this and include a copy to the SRA who are being particularly tolerant to this bunch of jackapes. This also shows that you are not to be messed with and are capable of stirring up trouble for them when they step out of line. Dear DCBL, I am in receipt of your letter of 18th April 2024 regarding CPR1.1 After studying the whole section I cannot see anywhere that I am required to furnish you  with my mail address or my phone number. Perhaps you would be kind enough to provide me with a reference to it. I suspect that your subterfuge is designed to allow you to bombard uninformed litigants with last minute information on the day of their Court case which appears to occur at times with your company. I notice that you are asking for proportionality at the same time as you are demanding  an unlawful £160 when you are aware that under PoFA the maximum that can be demanded  is only £100. You will note  that I have included the Solicitor's Regulation Authority into our conversation in order to ensure your reply. And your old excuse of "admin. error" is surely wearing a bit thin even with the SRA. so I look forward to an apology for your error and a declaration that you will desist from trying to hoodwink other motorists in future.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

tax credits overpaid due to not filling in a form


mikehunt69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2613 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was claiming tax credits, and due to not filling in their update form as required, they stopped the tax credits, and are sending me threatening letters to pay it back.

they said it's too late and I just have to pay. this dates from around last july.

 

to be clear, I should not be paying them anything according to my income, in fact they would owe me things, but obviously this depends on the claim being valid etc.

 

is there any option besides just paying them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the latest I have is a letter from LCS saying

 

'Notice of further action'

and demanding ~£1000

 

It's not a letter before action, just a 'we might do something further if you don't pay up.

 

As I understand it I just ignore the letters from LCS. Will HMRC take further action, and can I get the debt cancelled with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds as though you failed to complete your Annual Declaration (S17), sent out each year to confirm details of the claim and houseold circumstances for the previous year, and to make sure income and circumstances used for calculating and making ongoing payments is correct. Which year declaration was it? For example, if the declaration is for the 2015/16 period, you might be having the wrong income used, causing an overpayment to be shown for that year. Further, if you had payments made from 6th April 2016, all payments made from that period onwards, while HMRC were awaiting the declaration to be made, will automatically become overpayments whether you meet the eligibility criteria or not, because you failed to provide the data needed to verify ongoing entitlement in time.

 

You can tell LCS you want the debt passed back to HMRC and deal directly with HMRC. HMRC will still look to get any overpayment back.

 

If you believe you still have an ongoing entitlement, get in touch with the helpline and look to make a new claim, as any entitlement could help towards any outstanding debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a letter dated 15/8/2016 saying:

 

you do not complete the tax credits declaration form sent on 17/5/2016

 

child tax credit award for 2016-2017 is: £0.00

less already paid £1000

therefore you must pay back £1000

 

you have until 16/11/2016 to dispute recovery of the overpayment.

 

it looks like I'm late and nothing I can do? https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/509048/COP26.pdf

 

I can pay off the amount, but obviously I would like to delay that if possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tax Credits is paid provisionally in some cases. What I mean is that they will send you out a form asking you to report your circumstances each year. You get a few months to complete this form, and during that time you will still be paid whatever you were getting before. This is the S17 form that smokiejoe refers to in the post above.

 

However, your entitlement for the next year is worked out based on what you answer on that S17 form. If your answers indicate a reduced entitlement, your Tax Credits will be reduced for the remainder of the year to take account of what you've already been paid. If you don't complete the form at all, you'll lose all entitlement and anything you've already been paid will be regarded as overpaid and HMRC will seek to recover it. It sounds like this is what has happened.

 

There isn't a whole lot you can do since you didn't return that form. As smokiejoe said, if you think that you may still have an entitlement to TC you could make a new claim which might mitigate things a bit. This is one of the potential pitfalls of Tax Credits - it's intended to be helpful but can cause this problem if the form is not returned.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you choose to deal with LCS, contact them about a repayment schedule over a period of time, including if you simply want to delay and then pay in a lump sum. If you have requested the debt goes back to HMRC, once that's happened, get in touch with HMRC overpayment helpline and get an agreed repayment schedule with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes as detailed in post 5

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a similar issue a few years ago.

 

 

I actually sent in the form and the advisor even said to me 'we could have lost it' that happens a lot and they know it.

 

 

When you send anything to them make sure it's always recorded

 

They wanted me to repay and were sending letters.

 

 

I was not claiming TC at that point, when I subsequently did another claim they stopped chasing it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...