Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for the letter, that makes things a lot clearer. So it's a statutory demand rather than self-certifying. See what @Man in the middle thinks but to me, it seems as if the lawyer has a good strategy and seems to have covered all the bases. HB Β 
    • Could you post up the letter, with your personal info and their reference covered up, please? It should say Letter of Claim, but let's have a look just in case. HB
    • I know dx, a lot of it was my partner and how she felt about it. I also appear to be addicted to my credit file being clean. I still worry for my partner she has too much on as it is, but I am ensuring I manage both of ours so She can forget about. i guess in terms of time I bet masses are defaulting with this economy as it is right now and high interest rates might be the only thing going for me right now. I guess Β I’ll find out
    • Please see below for an extract from the letter more about my case. You have been convicted of two matters of failing to give driver details linked to two speeding offences and been disqualified in your absence. You confirmed that you did not receive the court documentation and the first you knew about the cases was on 3/6/24. As you can make a statutory declaration it is possible that we will be able to persuade the police to accept pleas to either or both of the speeding offences as they were committed within a very short space of time and withdraw the two fail to give driver details offences as normally if you plead to one or other of the speeding or fail to give driver details the prosecution will withdraw the other related offence. If successful you would not face a totting ban. In respect of the speeding offences, it could be argued they were committed on one occasion due to the proximity of the time and location and we may be able to persuade the prosecution to drop one of the speeding offences. You are technically guilty of all the offences because you accept it was you driving when the speeding offences were committed and that you did not update your change of address with the leasing company when it was your responsibility. If the prosecution will not withdraw the two failures to give driver details offences, you will face a totting ban but will be able to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. ThisΒ  may or may not go ahead at the court hearing date, so we need to prepare for all eventualities. As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge. The court have dealt with the matter very quickly and have actually listed your matter for an application to suspend the disqualification pending appeal on the above-mentioned date. We could actually use this date to make the statutory declaration in court having explained the situation to the magistrates and then see if the prosecution will agree to accept pleas to one or both of the speeding offences as a way of resolving the matter without the need for you to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. It is possible the case would need to be adjourned so that we can make those representations, or the court may want to go ahead and hear the exceptional hardship argument. The outcome of your case is always at the discretion of the Court. Β 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership. Β 

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom. Β Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up byΒ 10pm. Β They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done.Β 
      Β 

      Many thanksΒ 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

      Β 

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell threatening to pass disputed debt to collections department very debt


Scouse0151
style="text-align: center;"> Β 

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the lastΒ 2735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

Β 

Please click the "Report " link

Β 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

Β 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and moreΒ helpΒ 

Β 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, and thank you in advance for any help and guidance on this matter.

Β 

I requested a cca from Lowell regarding a debt of Β£9000 (which consists of mainly interest charges) from very catalogue.

Β 

Β 

They eventually returned an in signed agreement that has discrepancies on.

There appears to be 2 different dates they state the account was opened,

one is 07/12/2008 and an alleged credit agreement with an electronic tick for my signature dated 29/06/2011

Β 

The total debt is for Β£9,000.38 Of which Β£6,434.63 is made up of interest.

Β 

I am wondering what my next step is,

do I contact shop direct about discrepancies or Lowell ( who are demanding full payment or they are sending the debt to the collections department).

Β 

I have a neurological disorder which hinders my thinking process and mobility and I have been classed as disabled because of it.

Β 

I find the constant texting and phone calls disturbing

( I had written asking for all correspondence to be delt with by way of letter when I asked for the cca as my speak is slurred )

Β 

As I am unable to work due to my disability

the funds would not be available to pay the disputed debt.

Β 

Would I need to request a sar at all?

They have placed the debt onto my credit score now as being in default.

Β 

Sorry for the long post (trust me this has taken far longer to type than it has for you to read it πŸ˜‰

Once again thank you in advance for any advice given

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR to Very catalogues to get hold of all information.

Β 

Had you actually spent over Β£2k on the account ?

Β 

Why so much interest ? Who added the interest ?

Β 

How much of the Β£9k are charges on the account ?

Β 

When did Very sell this account on ?

Β 

When did you last make a payment for the account ?

Β 

Did you ever contact Very about having problems paying the account ?

Β 

Is this your only outstanding debt ?

Β 

Do you own any assets such as a house ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Β 

Β Have we helped you ...?Β  Β  Β  Β  Β PleaseΒ Donate buttonΒ to the Consumer Action Group

Β 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your speedy reply

Β 

Sadly they kept increasing my limit and I had foolishly took advantage of their buy now pay later offers,

I made regular payments until My Neurological disorder took a turn for the worse

Β 

No idea why the interest is so high, this was set by the catalogue company

Β 

Β£2,565.75. For purchases.

Β£6434.63 for interest

Β 

The debt was sold on the 15/02/2016

Β 

I'm unsure when the last payment was to them,

I would guess about 2 years ago

Β 

I did contact them about 5 years ago stating my mental health condition and ability to pay

Β 

I have credit card and store card debts too sadly

Β 

I have a mortgage on the house

Β 

Is it not strange that they have 2 different dates stating when the account was opened?

Β 

Thank you again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes dates of account opening point to Lowell not having much information on the debt.

Β 

Very should have responded to you properly when you contacted them 5 years ago.

The lending was irresponsible and interest/charges added may not be valid.

Β 

Next action by you is to send a urgent SAR to Very, asking for copies of everything on file and also copies of all statements of account.

Β 

You should also send a written complaint to Very about them not responding to the health issues you raised with them and them increasing the account limit breaking rules on irresponsible lending practice, with interest/charges added that would be considered excessive.

Β 

Given that Lowell do quite often issue court claims,

you might also want to inform Lowell in writing that you are currently pursuing a complaint with Very about the account.

Β 

Β 

Mention the health issues to them, so they are aware.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Β 

Β Have we helped you ...?Β  Β  Β  Β  Β PleaseΒ Donate buttonΒ to the Consumer Action Group

Β 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again for your help in this matter

I will get the wheels in motion and see what reply I get back.

Are Lowell allowed to show default on my credit score? They have recently added this debt on.

Thank you so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, normally they are updating a default applied by the original creditors,

but if Very had forgotten to note the default,

then as the new debt owners,

i don't see why Lowell could not add the default,

providing the information was accurate.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Β 

Β Have we helped you ...?Β  Β  Β  Β  Β PleaseΒ Donate buttonΒ to the Consumer Action Group

Β 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scouse

Β 

Welcome to CAG. First off let me say that what Lowell are trying to grab from you is way more then I would expect for one of these accounts.

Normally we see these accounts in the rang of Β£1k - Β£4k so I was shocked that they are asking for Β£9k when I started reading the thread.

Β 

It appears that Lowell so far have played ball. But remember that these debts get sold on enmasse and on spreadsheets.

Very should have definitely responded 5 years ago when you informed them. Get a SAR sent off if you havent already to Very / Shop Direct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply,

I requested that shop direct stop the interest too but they never responded to my letters and continued sending out requests for monthly payments of over Β£1,000 per month

Β 

I will be following all advice given on here as the stress of such a debt made up of predominantly interest is not good

Once again thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suspect that the original creditor defaulted you years ago

or upon the debts sale to lowlife

Β 

so as long as lowlife has not changed that date, all is ok there

Β 

do you have past copies of your credit file?

did shop direct show on there before sale?

Β 

don't forget a dca is NOT A BAILIFF

they have no such legal powers..

Β 

never converse on the phone text or at your door

Β 

have you sent your other creditors a cca request too?

might be an idea....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marksΒ and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVERΒ  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight...Β 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for your reply

Β 

I got a message from clear score to say my credit score had changed,

upon looking at it I noticed Lowell had me down as defaulting on Β£9k

Β 

I will check on equifax to see if my original creditor had reported default and the date of the default,.

i shall report back once I've looked on my full credit score site with the dates etc

I've not requested cca from other creditors.

Β 

I had a previous account with shop direct that was with very and an account with additions that got passed to very too, very had me as a customer on two different accounts (is that allowed? )

Β 

Β 

I cca to the original very account and they could not provide it so the account was closed ,

I had forgotten about that.

Thank you for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCA request goes to whomever is chasing or whomever you are paying , so NOT always the OC.

Β 

Β 

additions/very are all the same company , shop direct,

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marksΒ and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVERΒ  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight...Β 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...