Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/Restons claimform 1998 HSBC loan debt


Janus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2230 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

letter from court was dated 4.11.17, guess it will be another couple of weeks before I hear anything more ?

 

just an interim question, thats all (before I can upload any letters/docs from restons, tomorrow)

 

I appreciate all the help everyone has given to me, thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

removed your links

please attach them HERE as one multipage PDF

read UPLOAD

 

and you've left ref numbers showing too

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is N244 stuff (redacted, all the boring jargon not included)

 

N244 :

Alternatively, if the court is not minded to deal with this application on an ex-parte basis, the

Claimant seeks an Order: -

 

1. To lift the stay on these proceedings; and

2. To strike out the Defence pursuant to CPR 3.4(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules on the basis

that it discloses no reasonable grounds for defending the claim and/or is an abuse of the Court

process; or

 

3. In the alternative to (2) above, an Order for Summary Judgment against the Defendant under

Part24.2 of the Civil Procedures Rules. The Defendant has no real prospect of successfully

defending the claim and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of

at a trial; and

 

4. That the Defendant do pay the Claimant's costs on a contractual (indemnity) basis, pursuant to

CPR 44.5.

 

(iv) Prior to and since being served with a copy of the Defence, my firm has written to

the Defendant on a number of occasions, including instances whereby my firm

provided the Defendant with documentation relating to the account and which is

exhibited to this Witness Statement. Copies of all correspondence exchanged

between my firm and the Defendant are exhibited to this Witness Statement at

"CGQ4", with the exception of any "Without Prejudice" correspondence.

 

8. In my respectful submission, the Defence should not succeed because: -

(i) The Defendant does not dispute signing the Credit Agreement, being provided

with a loan or the fact that the loan has not been repaid. It is my respectful

submission that in order for the Defendant to assert a belief that the outstanding

debt is statute barred he must be aware that this is an account he entered into and

whereby he accrued the debt;

 

(ii) Throughout the lifetime of the account, the Defendant would have been sent

annual statements of account by the original creditor which would have recorded

payments made towards the account and the application of contractual interest /

charges, as well as confirming the outstanding balance;

 

(iii) The Defendant does not allege that he is still being pursued for this debt by the

original creditor and hence there is no sensible reason for the Defendant to

challenge the assignment of this account. It is my respectful submission that the

Notice of Assignment exhibited to this Witness Statement confirms that the

Claimant fulfilled its obligations by issuing a notice, pursuant to Section 136 of

the Law of Property Act 1925;

 

(iv) The information provided to my firm is that the last payment credited to the

account was on 10 November 2012 and that a balance of £4,700.82 remained

outstanding at the time my firm were instructed. This information correlates with

the Statements of Account exhibited at "CGQ2". In view of the date of the last

payment, legal proceedings have been issued within 6 years and therefore the debt

is not statute barred.

 

9. I acknowledge that these Proceedings have been stayed since October 2016. Following

receipt of the Defence, my firm made the decision to allow the Claim to become stayed

automatically so that attempts could be made to obtain account documentation from the

original creditor and to try to resolve matters amicably with the Defendant in order to

avoid the need for this litigation to continue. However, as those attempts have been

unsucce'sful, I respectfully ask the Court to now lift the stay.

 

10. 1 also respectfully ask the Court to strike out the Defence on an ex-parte basis and to

enter Judgment in accordance with the request attached to this Witness Statement at

"CGQ5". That request seeks costs on entering Judgment and a breakdown of those

 

court letter from 4.11.17 :

 

This claim has been transferred to the County Court at ************ for that court to deal with the

claimant's application to lift the stay and for summary judgment.

That court will refer the application to a judge, or, if there is to be a hearing, will send you and the other parties

notice of the time, date and place of hearing.

You will be sent a copy of the judge's decision.

All further communication should be addressed to:

The Court Manager

Courts Of Justice

*******

 

hope this helps.

 

costs is detailed in the Statement of Costs attached to this Witness Statement at

"CGQ6". I respectfully ask the Court to award those costs on the basis that:

 

(i) The Defendant has been given numerous opportunities to withdraw the Defence

previously filed, but has not done so; and

 

(ii) The costs sought, are in my respectful submission, reasonable and proportionate.

 

11. If the Court is not minded to deal with this application on an ex-parte basis then I

respectfully request that the application be listed for a hearing with a time estimate of 40

minutes and that the application be treated as an application:

(i) To lift the Stay on these proceedings; and

(ii) To strike out the Defence; or

 

(iii) For Summary Judgment; and

(iv) For an Order that the Defendant do pay the Claimant's costs on a contractual

(indemnity) basis, pursuant to CPR 44.5.

 

12. The Claimant's Application Notice and this Witness Statement are based on the issues

pleaded in the Defendant's Defence. If the Court is not minded to deal with this

application on an ex-parte basis, I respectfully request that it should be listed for a

hearing. If the Defendant attempts to raise new allegations at that hearing which have

not been pleaded in the Defence, the Claimant reserves the right to request an

adjournment of that hearing and to seek an Order that the Defendant do pay the

Claimant's costs of the adjournment, together with any other costs incurred as a result

of the adjourned hearing, but not limited to, the costs of filing and serving further

evidence to deal with any new allegations raised by the Defendant.

 

this is final, continuation of N244 page

 

sorry, been long week, I am very fatigued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need to see their evidence its not statute barred read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

court letter from 4.11.17 :

 

This claim has been transferred to the county courtlink3.gif at ************ for that court to deal with the

claimant's application to lift the stay and for summary judgment.

That court will refer the application to a judge, or, if there is to be a hearing, will send you and the other parties

notice of the time, date and place of hearing.

You will be sent a copy of the judge's decision.

All further communication should be addressed to:

The Court Manager

Courts Of Justice

*******

 

 

thats ok then.

if you haven't had anything from the court since then, it's waiting to hear from your local court on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and yu don't need too.

 

we need to see their documents please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so when was the last successful payment according to their statements

a bounced payment does not count

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so when was the last successful payment according to their statements

a bounced payment does not count

 

I will go back over their 50 pages of crap and try to see when the last successful payment was. No more letters since 4.11.17 from court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

scan that sheet up

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I lost my defence hearing today at court, between Arrow and myself

 

I will now have to deal with options on CCJ, pay all (if I can), pay in installments, or tell them to go whistle dixie,

 

I do not have house/mortgage, am self employed.

 

part of me wants to tell them to go take a long jump off cliff

 

I did a good witness statement based on Statute Barred ( I probably left the CCA request etc too late due to ill health last year which distracted me, took my eye off the ball. My health had to come first, without that we are nothing)

 

another poster wrote a good post about 'what can they actually do even with CCJ', something like that (if you have no house/mortgage etc). Post was few years back (dont know if I can put posters name here, or link to his post ?). It kind of cheered me up a bit today.

 

anyway, been long day, I got another 1.4k slammed on top of 4.7k debt to boot from judge for their costs. I had good witness statement and good case , but he was always going to side with the claimant, plain as day.

 

my advice to all is not to sit on these things, take all the advice here on this forum and get the CCA requests etc in as soon possible

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe somebody would correct me here but I would have thought that if there is no CCA, then the alleged debt is unenforceable – in which case this would be the basis for applying for set-aside.

 

Have you made a request for a CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but how did you get hit with £1400 of costs in small claims.

 

Yes - very good point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£185 to issue the claim......£100 Sols fees ...£335.00 hearing fee......did they instruct a Barrister to act at the hearing ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for replies, I am dushed after the hearing yesterday, tough day at work today, so am worn out :jaw:

 

Sorry but how did you get hit with £1400 of costs in small claims

 

the judge gave me a load of waffle about fast tracks etc and from what I can recall said the case had not been officially allocated to the small claims, or something along those lines. To be honest at this point yesterday I was phasing out, I just wanted to get out of there

 

I guess it will be few days before I see the paperwork, bill from Restons, for costs

 

At the end, the solicitor and judge starting talking about another case in front of me. Which I found unprofessional really. Just my opinion. Clearly they work together on a regular basis

 

the judge was not interested in my defence at all really,

 

I did make a CCA request, all I got back from the original bank was 'they do not recognise me on their system from the account details I provided' which were 100% correct

 

I made a SAR request to get back up copies of my statements, again the original lender (HSBC) did not comply with the request. I did get a reply, but I heard nothing else

 

I did all this 3 months back, so was probably late in timescales, but I have had very poor health for past 18 months. I have had x2 major ops in 18 months, and this had to be my no.1 priority, to get back to some kind of good health, a process which I am still working on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fast Track...that makes a difference.......Fast track claim hearing fee £545........ Issuance 4.5% of the value of the claim....as we dont know the details of claim and you have not confirmed if the link posted above is connected (Post #2)....... its difficult to comment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you set out the chronology of this debt. You are suggesting that it was statute barred. Also you requested a CCA but they didn't give it to you. Is this all correct?

 

Please could you post up your defence in PDF format

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a quick look at the previous thread. I see that people have been helping you for some time but in December you were asked by a team member DX to let us know the date of the last payment. You told us it was 2012.

 

Then team member DX asked you in January asked you to post that sheet up and since then there has been no response. You simply said that you were preparing your defence.

 

I think you need to start responding to this thread and act quickly if you want to do anything.

 

I appreciate the you may have had various problems but I think that now you are being hit by this very large sum of money, you need to start prioritising things a bit better.

 

Please will you respond on this thread to the request made by team member DX concerning the last payment and also please post up your defence. I wouldn't hang around any more

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...