Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Excel/BW claimform - PCN Swansea SA1 2012


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2439 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The saga continues.

 

 

Another letter from BW Legal saying "Letter of claim" on it, but all it is, is another letter demanding the same amount of money by 6th of March 2017 or their client WILL instruct them to take legal action :violin:

they said in their letter last year that was the last chance before they took legal action.

 

 

Im of the opinion they know its pre POFA and I have no liability and are just continuing to try their luck and are now putting "Letter of Claim" across the top to make people think its at a more serious stage or something?

 

my intentions are to ignore?

 

Regards

47

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 132
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yep. claim you owe something

not letter before action...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are not only rubbish solicitors but also rubbish clairvoyants.

 

They cant tell what thir client will do on a certain date but i will also offer a view of the future.

They will lose a court claim if they make one.

 

Dont bother responding, Excel have taken a bit of a beating in court recently on defended claims so BW are probably sending out a letter for free to kiss and make up with them for costing them money for their last day out.

 

Expect a letter saying you have won the Canadian lottery, all you have to do is pay them a £160 admin fee and the prize is yours I always wondered how they got peoples names and addresses, perhaps there is a link?

 

The saga continues.

 

Another letter from BW Legal saying "Letter of claim" on it, but all it is, is another letter demanding the same amount of money by 6th of March 2017 or their client WILL instruct them to take legal action :violin:

they said in their letter last year that was the last chance before they took legal action.

 

Im of the opinion they know its pre POFA and I have no liability and are just continuing to try their luck and are now putting "Letter of Claim" across the top to make people think its at a more serious stage or something?

 

my intentions are to ignore?

 

Regards

47

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well ladies and gentlemen.

 

I am surprised to say I have just received a claim form from county court!

 

I think there is a section of what to do now isn't there?

 

I will push it all the way through I'm not at all bothered by going to court.

 

It's always been on principle anyway that they demand so much money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

first thing to do is acknowledge the claim.

Best done online at moneyclaimonline.

That way you can keep an eye on the clock for when they have to do the next bit.

Then you have an extra fortnight to submit a skeleton defence.

 

In this time you send off a CPR 31.14 request to BWL demanding sight of their contract with the landowner that assigns the right to enter into contracts with the public and to make civil claims in their own name.

 

Also ask for sight of the planning permission for their signage under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007.

 

Lastly you ask for strict proof of who the driver was at the time and copies of any notices or correspondence issued by their client.

 

Give the 14 days to respond.

They wont so you can add this failure to follow procedure and show evidence of a cause for action in your skeleton defence and ask for the claim to be struck out (on several grounds )

That will force the to either discontinue or risk a costs order, which will be your next request to court.

 

Get cracking so they are damned whichever way they go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14link3.gif request running to the solicitors

.

don't signlink3.gif anything

.

here is the CPR you need to send:

 

 

to the solicitors

[Your address]

.

[Their address [solicitors]

.

[Date]

.

Dear Sir or Madam,

.

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

.

CPR 31.14 Request

.

On (date) I received the claim formlink3.gif in this case issued by you out of the (Name) county courtlink3.gif.

.

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

.

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

.

1. the contract between [parking company name] and the landowner that assigns the right to enter into contracts with the public and make claims in their own name,.

.

2.proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007

.

3.copies of the notice to driver, notice to keeper and any other correspondence from [insert Claimant Name] & [insert Solicitors Name} to the defendant that they intend to rely upon in court.

.

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are disclosed at your earliest convenience..

.

Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy.

.

Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

.

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

.

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

.

If you are unable to comply with this request within 14 days and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request please confirm in your response.

.

You are reminded that as this case is yet to be allocated to a track, CPR31:14 does apply, a refusal to comply because you 'think' at this stage you dont have too will be used against you in any filed defence.

.

Yours faithfully

.

TYPE YOUR NAME DO NOT SIGN IT

 

........

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thats all done as above and i will post it to them tomorrow unsigned. I looked at the "fill this out" bit above but it seemed more to do with current accounts and overdrafts etc etc than PCN's so i dont know if its worth filling in? but of you think its worth it i will.

 

Thanks

Regards,

47

Link to post
Share on other sites

well atleast the POC and the dates

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

once you tick the defend in full you automatically get another 14 days added to the existing fortnight from the date of issue.

 

You don't have to apply,

all you need to do is get a few bullet points in the relevant spot and it progresses to the next bit.

 

The reason you aren't doing that now is you want to hit them when they don't follow the court procedures regarding the CPR information request.

 

If you delay sending that to the solicitors you will run yourself out of time so get a move on with the CPR 31.14 and the ack of service .

 

Ok perfect. Thanks.

Just to confirm.

 

 

Tick the option to dispute the whole claim.

Then shall I apply for the 28 days?

 

 

The extra time to prepare defence part?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got the cpr request and ack of service done on the 16th.

 

Then received a condescending letter in the post from BW legal saying as you will be aware we have served a claim against you and then a little section saying this is what you NEED to do now :roll:

 

Name of claimant - Excel parking services LTD

Date of issue - 13 March 2016

 

 

particulars of claim

1.the claimant's claim is for the sum of £100 being monies due from the defendant to the claim in respect of a parking charge notice issued on 6th of August 2012 at XXXXX hrs at Swansea SA1

 

The PCN relates to a XXXXX under registration XXXXX.

The terms of the PCN allowed the defendant 28 days from the issue date to pay the PCN but the defendant failed to do so. Despite demand having been made the defendant has failed to settle their outstanding liability.

 

 

The claim also includes statutory interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum and a daily rate of 0.02 from 6th August 2012 to 10th of March 2017 being an amount of £33.56.

The claimant also claims £54 contractual costs pursuant to PCN terms and conditions.

 

Regards

47

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they can get stuffed, to use the polite archaic term.

 

The contract you are purported to have entered into is for the sum of £100.

That is what they can claim. End of story.

 

But they still haven't said what it is for: Is it a contractual charge, or is it a penalty for you breaching the contract.

 

But I would say at this stage ignore anything they have to say, and deal solely with the instructions of the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are hoping you are bricking it and are going to pay up.

If you dont their client will lose some more money and they will both look stupid.

 

Later on you should consider asking the court for a full expenses order for their unreasonableness

(ie they know that pre-POFA they have to show strict proof of driver identity) under CPR 27.4.2(g)

 

You may be asking for a striking out of the claim anyway,

 

wait until you get the directions questionnaire and the go for that as the claim is too vague as to be viable

Link to post
Share on other sites

the N180 will come in the post from the court.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Still nothing in the post.

I checked online and there has been nothing from excel so far, the only things there are them issuing the claim and me responding do it.

No additional documents or anything so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

its quite a common new tactic for the claimant sols to send a copy of any 'proposed' paperwork to unsettle and unnerve defendants.

 

lowells have started to do this with civil in the last 3mts.

 

these fleecers whilst slow to pick up upon the confusion sending a proposed N180 causes

they'll not be slow to exploit it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Still not a thing in the post from the court.

No info or documents added online.

Don't I need to submit my defence now?

As per the time line i need to be putting it in now

 

Regards

47

Link to post
Share on other sites

You def is due today by 4 pm

 

Find and use the simple 2 line VCS excel bw defence in most threads here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant has not offerd a contract, so there cannot be a*

breach of contract claim for the defendant to consider. Sigange at*

the site does not create a contractual obligation upon the*

defendant so no breach could have occurred.

 

Is what I've gone for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...