Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
    • An update to this case as I’ve not been on in a while.    I am still awaiting a charging decision in the case. The two police officers involved have said their personal belief is a section 47 ABH charge is the most likely outcome but this isn’t a sure thing of course.    The EA certificate from the issuing court has now lapsed. The court have refused to recertify him until they’ve had a hearing in to the case, and the district judge has issued orders to surrender all evidence, footage, photos etc.    I have done so promptly.    the EA, not so much . Equita have claimed they cannot provide his bodycam footage as the camera he was wearing is the EA personal one not one of theirs.   the EA has claimed he has asked Equita and the police for the footage as he claims he doesn’t have it.    the police have confirmed they didn’t seize his camera and they don’t have it.    so they are basically pointing the finger at each other all the while failing to comply with the district judges order to provide all evidence they intend to rely on at the rescheduled hearing.    The district judge has stated the hearing for his certification will NOT be the hearing for my complaint as there is no charge as of yet, and just as to whether he should be recertified or not.    I’m not 100% on why that can’t be done at the time, but I’m not about to question a judge…..      
    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA RESULT: NATWEST have said they do not have my default letter, can i get it removed??


shiblets
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2847 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

i have requested a SAR on Natwest Bank and also Barclays,

so far Natwest have replied back with their first letter.

 

The objective of my SARS is to attain my old statement, fees, transactions and charges to claim back on and also for PPI.

 

I know I have had a lot of bank charges as I used my Natwest account when i was a student and really bad with my money!:-(

 

I have attached the letter which Natwest have sent back,

i was hoping someone could shed some light on what I could reply via email with?

 

They have mentioned statements

now can i say I just want ALL the information and statements available

or I remember reading somewhere to specifically state i want all bank charges and fees?

 

I typed up the below to send them, unsure if it is any good?

 

Thank you for your letter of acknowledgment to my SARS request.

 

As my letter states, I require ALL relevant documentation linked to my name,

therefore I would like all statements including bank charges and fees to be provided to me,

from the date my account was opened till it was closed.

 

If you are concerned about the environment I will consider having it emailed over to me from an official source along with a written letter confirming what has been or will be provided via email to me,

this is to ensure its authenticity, it is also proof for me should matters escalate due to any data violations and unlawful SARS violations.

 

I should be informed of any documentation that cannot be provided to me via writing or email correspondence.

sarsnatwest.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the first sentence would do, your charges and fee's should be on the statements.

  • Confused 1
Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish all the data concerning this account for my personal records.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All,

 

I had another post on here where i had started my CCA requests for several debts, one of which was Natwest.

The result has been interesting:

 

1: Natwest have sent across paperwork,

a list of what letters were sent out to me and dates but no actual letters!

 

There was a direct email address for the case worker who was dealing with my CCA request,

i emailed stating that there was no hard copy of the 'default' notice stated in the paper work

simply a date and that i require a copy of the original default notice letter,

as my SARS request stated i require ALL documents sent or relating to me.

 

I had a reply saying they did not hold this information on the system so she cannot provide me with proof of a default letter.

 

Now my question is

 

how can i chase this up and get my default removed as they do not have evidence that they sent me the notice

yet continue to put a default on my credit file.

 

2: Natwest had orginally had Robinsonsway to chase me for my debt,

whilst i sent a SARS to natwest i had sent a CCA request to robinsons way,

now they sent quite few letters stating that the account is on hold while they request this information

as it has not been provided yet.

 

I have now received a letter from NAtwest stating the following

 

" Our collection agents have been unable to come to a suitable arrangemnt with you, t

herefore your account details have been passed to Allied International to act as our new collection agent.

 

Any queries about your account should now be addressed to this collection agent until further notice.

 

Allied International will be in contact with you during the next 14 days to discuss yoru repayment options,

should you wish to contact them directly their contact details are 0141 228 3008

Regards

Debt Management Operations.

My question

do i now have to go through the entire process again and send a CCA to this new DCA?

if that is the case could natwest simply do this over and over again with a new DCA every few months?

 

Is there a way i can put an end to this, clearly natwest couldnt provide robinsons way with the correct paperwork.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You my friend have your defaults mixed up.

 

The entry on your CRA file is completely different to the default notice they send to terminate the contract. You have little chance of getting the default removed if it is accurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as Allied are concerned you can either ignore them

or send one letter explaining that you have sent a CCA request to NW

and they stil have not complied with it.

 

 

Therefore no collection attempts can be made until your request has been satisfied.

Any further letters will result in a strong complaint to the FCA.

 

As far as NW are concerned you do need to write to them.

 

First they have no business passing your details to a DCA when they have failed to respond to your CCA request.

In addition they have failed to comply with your SAR request completely.

 

 

Should any correspondence come from Allied before the CCA request has been sent

you will complain to the FCA about your cavalier attitude to the Law

and to question whether hey are fit to hold a Consumer Licence.

 

On another matter, was the debt for a loan or a credit card, and when was the last time you made a payment.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

quite honestly

until/unless your CCA request is met

i'd simply be ignoring everyone.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Lookinforinfo,

 

Thank you for your kind advice,

the CCA is for a bank overdraft,

 

I am now reading around further about this and it seems that banks do not have to comply with a CCA request if it is related to an overdraft.

 

Whilst Natwest have not written to inform me of this,

 

i am in a similar situation with Barclays

they have had PRA group who are their DCA and who i had sent the CCA request to

with a letter stating the above fact.

 

I am now in a dilema how to handle this.

I am writing with a letter to Allied and NAtwest as suggested

however any ideas from anyone on how i could deal with this if it is an overdraft?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays have nothing to do with PRA

PRA [akitiva Kapital] are a debt buyer/DCA group

 

 

just do the sar

that's all you can do to the OC for a bank account

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays have nothing to do with PRA

PRA [akitiva Kapital] are a debt buyer/DCA group

 

 

just do the sar

that's all you can do to the OC for a bank account

 

Hi Dx100uk

 

I have done a sar on Barclays and natwest.

 

I am unsure what I am meant to do with all the information sent to me really.

Neither sent me the original default notices that they have listed as part of the letters sent but not the letter itself.

 

Regarding pra they are saying in the letter they are acting on behalf of their client and the account with Barclays.

I will upload the letter from them if it helps.

 

I am unsure where I can go with this now,

after sar and cca I was hoping to either find out if they are unenforceable

or have some power to negotiate reduced f&f

and as they have kit provided proof of default notice which is now on my credit files I could negotiate that off too.

 

Please any advice what my next step should be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

all they jave to do is have anote in the comms/account log that a DN was sent

if that exists, not 'actually' havng the DN or a CCA [for the Barclays one]

is no reason to remove a default sadly.

PRA don't chase debts for others

so their client I doubt is Barclays.

 

 

cant see what you can do sadly

 

 

what are the defaulted dates in the summary section not the calender?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...