Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  So brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details so first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it ,this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025 so slightly longer than the original tax set up so all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. So I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled so I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
    • Do you also own land the garages on and the private road? Or is it shared freehold with right of access to all freeholders or why?  Dx  
    • I may try cheap plastic bollards (traffic cones) first just to see if they get moved.  I will look into the cost of fixed bollards.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Tories lied: More cuts to sickness and disability benefits are on the way


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2949 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2016/05/11/the-tories-lied-more-cuts-to-sickness-and-disability-benefits-are-on-the-way/

 

That’s right; after announcing that the government had “no further plans” for benefit cuts in March, Stephen Crabb is going back on his word.

 

He says “welfare reform” (whatever a Tory thinks that is) shouldn’t come to an end, just because the government has put in place measures that should cut the benefit bill by £12 billion.

 

Further cuts to disability and sickness benefits are in the pipeline, the Work and Pensions Secretary has signalled.

Stephen Crabb said he wanted to go further than the £12 billion welfare cuts set out in the Conservative manifesto and “re-frame discussion” around disability welfare reform.

The surprise announcement comes just under two months since Mr Crabb said the Government had “no further plans” for welfare cuts.

“The measures that have either already been legislated for or announced get us to the £12 billion [welfare cuts planned in the Conservative manifesto],” he said.

 

“Does that mean welfare reform comes to an end? I would say no. I’ve already pointed to what I see as one of the big challenges of welfare reform – and that’s around work and health.”

 

Mr Crabb told MPs on Work and Pensions Select Committee that he would deploy “smart strategies” for cutting expenditure on disability and sickness benefits and would hopefully be able to secure the support of disability charities.

 

Dear god, how much more can we take....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it's terrible. Everyone who decides they can't work should get as much money as they feel they deserve for free, without any question, for ever.

 

None of your previous posts sound like a political rant at all Sadone. Do you really, really think Labour would do any different?

Edited by furiosa
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what the tory self servers do kick the poor and disabled at every opportunity if there was a viable alternative political party i would be gunning for an early election if that is in anyway possible, but none of the other parties give a dam either,

Link to post
Share on other sites

But imo ANYTHING is better then the bunch of monsters we have now. The others can be useless, but I've never known a party so intent as the Tories have been to destroy a part of the population. A part who sadly have difficulty fighting back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes you wonder who they would target if they cured us all or scrapped all benefits completely , would they still be on this crusade to save money? when the damage that they have done has actually cost the tax payer more than if they hadn't meddled ? IDS the changed man now has a conscience apparently , what next will he become a volunteer at his local CAB perhaps? more like his buddy doris will give him a job when PM when dodgy dave gets the chop

 

And Boris voted for these benefit cuts

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this thread would be better placed in the Bear Garden.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it's terrible. Everyone who decides they can't work should get as much money as they feel they deserve for free, without any question, for ever.

 

None of your previous posts sound like a political rant at all Sadone. Do you really, really think Labour would do any different?

 

Except, it's not a case of deciding they don't want to work. Maybe you sould educate yourself. As much as I would love to work, it is actually impossible for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this kind of thread always enrages many.Myself included.

I personally feel the Welfare System is a complete mess.

Many people have clearly been hurt by the whole System,whether , Atos, which i believe but could be corrected if wrong has cost more than it has saved.And seems for many, i apologise but kind of if you can touch a keyboard with your nose you are fit to work

And is claimed to have even cost lives.

 

Not just that but the Universal Credit system that seemed a good idea but is a complete shambles as well.

All the sanctions and more that have left some,vulnerable people in turmoil.

Clearly in my view a outdated Welfare system for this day and age.That i believe costs 400.00 a week for every man woman and child in the country.But once again correct me if i am wrong.

 

So we come down to Affordability i suppose.Whoever is in power has to it seems make savings.

So it will go on and on,for ever and a day.And we will curse them all.

 

Now i have looked around for a alternative for a while fit for the modern world.

And to create fairness for all.And would not hurt anyone if implemented one day.

And would counter Austerity,possibly end poverty and create a simple system.A modern system.Perhaps finish the unfair Welfare System once and for all.

 

Also it would take into consideration the needs of the Disabled,the poor,the people who want to work and those who do not.

And put people like Stephen Crabb out of work.Who despite his background when young,probably gets smacked about daily by Emperor Osborne who along with others in my view that is are wearing blinkers.Only see,cut,cut ,cut.No alternative.

 

And as you say it was said that no further cuts would be made in this parliament.

But they had already been made perhaps but not implemented.

But correct me if wrong.

 

Just to remind ourselves.

Government rules out any further cuts to welfare – video

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2016/mar/21/tory-turmoil-cameron-ids-osborne-back-after-ids-resignation-by-backing-compassionate-conservatism-politics-live?page=with%3Ablock-56f032e0e4b0304172354f20

 

That system is called the Basic Guaranteed Income.

Now i cannot go into the system massively on one thread.But here is the link that i update from time to time when time allows.

Think about it,take a little time to understand it.Let your imagination run with it.Because around the world at this very moment it is about to happen,and gaining supporters worldwide.May start a little slow but the picture becomes clear as the thread develops.

 

I have had my say,some may think i am barking mad,well fair enough.But i hope some may see the possibilities.

Better than forever cursing the Politicians.Let us put some of them out of work instead.

 

Basic Income Guarantee-Do You Like The Idea-Any Views-Have Your Say.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?461005-Basic-Income-Guarantee-Do-You-Like-The-Idea-Any-Views-Have-Your-Say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, it's terrible. Everyone who decides they can't work should get as much money as they feel they deserve for free, without any question, for ever.

 

None of your previous posts sound like a political rant at all Sadone. Do you really, really think Labour would do any different?

 

Err, these are people who pay tax and national insurance. Your ignorance is plain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what the tory self servers do kick the poor and disabled at every opportunity if there was a viable alternative political party i would be gunning for an early election if that is in anyway possible, but none of the other parties give a dam either,

 

You will find that this change was pushed through by Tory MPs only. Not a single MP from another party voted in favour of this. Indeed, the House of Lords tried to block it on more than one occasion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this thread would be better placed in the Bear Garden.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

 

Thats a shame. IMO less people who it will actually effect will see it, and more posters who just want to have a dig will. But oh well....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats a shame. IMO less people who it will actually effect will see it, and more posters who just want to have a dig will. But oh well....

 

I would tend to agree ....as it was at post #1...but you see how it soon became fractured from post#2 and will no doubt just turn into another rambling thread.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well dare I suggest maybe you could have just deleted that post to halt the usual cascade into idiocy/trolling. :)

 

And to ad similar themed threads have survived being posted in the other section and have managed to avoid descend into a slanging match.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well dare I suggest maybe you could have just deleted that post to halt the usual cascade into idiocy/trolling. :)

 

And to ad similar themed threads have survived being posted in the other section and have managed to avoid descend into a slanging match.

 

Are you saying that others of a different opinion aren't allowed to voice their thoughts ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, and you obviously know that already. But if the mod doesn't want this to become a shouting match then you have to rein certain troll posts in (which I've seen done many times before in the benefit advice section), and which is what I categorize post number two as being.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remain at a loss as what the significant difference is between someone who is in the support group and someone in the work-related activity group. They are both unwell and/or disabled albeit in various degrees.

 

Their health could get worse depending on their circumstances. In fact, a person who is disabled would receive far more than someone fighting cancer and whose needs are not too dissimilar.

 

It is seriously inapt to treat these issues as an exact science and therefore a tick-boxing and point-scoring exercise. It is wholly wrong to treat all of those in the work-related activity group as malingerers due to a few exceptions. All these people need the appropriate support and not unfair and inhumane coercing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will find that this change was pushed through by Tory MPs only. Not a single MP from another party voted in favour of this. Indeed, the House of Lords tried to block it on more than one occasion.
Shame about the last labour government then it was under their watch that ESA was introduced they started this whole persecution of the sick, then the LIB dems in the coalition, many of them voted for cuts that affected the sick and vulnerable they IMO have a track record for not caring

 

We have the cuts to Esa wrag And a short time after that the Work program will become the Health & work program , they are talking about medical staff in JCP's and being able to administer "THERAPY" Next they will be forcing the sick to work for benefits I have little doubt who was the brainchild behind this idea

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shame about the last labour government then it was under their watch that ESA was introduced they started this whole persecution of the sick, then the LIB dems in the coalition, many of them voted for cuts that affected the sick and vulnerable they IMO have a track record for not caring

 

We have the cuts to Esa wrag And a short time after that the Work program will become the Health & work program , they are talking about medical staff in JCP's and being able to administer "THERAPY" Next they will be forcing the sick to work for benefits I have little doubt who was the brainchild behind this idea

 

I think society has an natural (or unnatural depending on how you look at it) inclination to label the sick/disabled as a burden and liability until one finds himself/herself in that position. Indeed, no person is immune from illness or prejudice.

 

The "therapy" you speak of would be an unmitigated disaster.

 

I think when the Universal Credit system is fully implemented we are all in for a devastating shock. You do not need to look far to learn how much of a shambles that has been to date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think society has an natural (or unnatural depending on how you look at it) inclination to label the sick/disabled as a burden and liability until one finds himself/herself in that position. Indeed, no person is immune from illness or prejudice.

 

The "therapy" you speak of would be an unmitigated disaster.

 

I think when the Universal Credit system is fully implemented we are all in for a devastating shock. You do not need to look far to learn how much of a shambles that has been to date.

Yes and the same vile man was behind UC as well ,He has wasted more tax payers money than they have saved ,

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following relates to many areas, but I think highlights how little society gains from these tax cuts for the immense negative impacts.

(note the figures dont include the tax avoidance by the many financial institutions in the 'City of London' which would add BILLIONS to the nations tax income if sorted.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/what-the-uk-could-look-like-if-people-actually-paid-their-tax-a6978961.html

The Tory Legacy

Record high: Taxes, Immigration, Excrement in waterways, energy company/crony profits

Crumbling: Hospitals, Schools, council services, businesses and roads

If only the Govt had thrown a protective ring around care homes

with the same gusto they do around their crooked MPs

 

 “Do I want to spend every Friday for the next five years in Clacton?”

Farage, Feb 2024 talking smack about the Peninsula town

.. before he decided he wanted their votes

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following relates to many areas, but I think highlights how little society gains from these tax cuts for the immense negative impacts.

(note the figures dont include the tax avoidance by the many financial institutions in the 'City of London' which would add BILLIONS to the nations tax income if sorted.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/what-the-uk-could-look-like-if-people-actually-paid-their-tax-a6978961.html

 

Indeed, address the wealthy tax evaders first before launching inhumane cuts on the sick and disabled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...