Jump to content

You can now change your notification sounds by going to this link https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/index.php?/&app=soundboard&module=soundboard&controller=managesounds

 

You can find a library of free notification sounds in several places on the Internet. Here's one which has a very large selection https://notificationsounds.com/notification-sounds

 

 

BankFodder BankFodder

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Arguing with the insurer about whether the 22% additional premium they would have wanted at renewal if they had known about the two SP30s is justified is likely to be a waste of time. The insurer doesn't have to prove it to you. In practice it'll be what came out of their computer when they re-ran the calculation of renewal premium with the two SP30s added. If the two SP30s were in the same year then a 22% increase in premium is the sort of increase you'd expect. It doesn't seem outrageous or unreasonable.    It would be surprising if the information you were sent before auto-renewal took place didn't mention the need to notify any changes in your circumstances to insurers. Courts are not very sympathetic to drivers who claim they didn't know they had to declare motoring convictions. Judges tend to take the view that every driver knows the significance of motoring convictions to their insurance premium.   The value of the vehicle only plays a small part in the deciding the premium. 
    • No it says the search was carried out on the 9th July.  Says it was a hard search that can impact your credit score and can be seen by other lenders.    
    • Package holiday firms should promptly issue refunds to customers whose holidays have been cancelled, even in spite of the “extraordinary pressures” they are facing during the coronavirus pandemic, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) warned on Friday.   The regulator noted that consumers have a statutory right to a full cash refund within 14 days of the termination of their package holiday, even if the reasons for the cancellation are “unavoidable and extraordinary.”   “We expect businesses to comply with these requirements where package holiday contracts are terminated due to the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Cecilia Parker Aranha of the CMA in an open letter to package travel sector.   “We are aware that many consumers have been promised full cash refunds, but these have yet to be paid,” she said.   https://uk.yahoo.com/finance/news/coronavirus-competition-and-markets-authority-package-holiday-refunds-100214568.html
    • that is not acknowledgement.   so what if moorcroft did a search. no-one bar you and they can see it anyway i bet the search was from before the time you updated the address too.   simply a trace to find your correct address to try and mug you blind   send the sb letter as advised.   dx    
    • All I put in letter was   Account Number   please be advised of my new address    my name or husband’s    no signature    I must admit apart from 2 of them writing back to acknowledge.  One of then NatWest I’ve heard from no one else.   Natwest did email to a old email address that we have access to but never use asking for us to reply confirming our address but we never replied.   Im just unsure why Moorcroft have done a credit search yesterday. 
  • Our picks

    • Currys Refuse Refund F/Freezer 5day old. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422656-currys-refuse-refund-ffreezer-5day-old/
      • 5 replies
    • Hi,  
      I was in Sainsbury’s today and did scan and shop.
      I arrived in after a busy day at work and immediately got distracted by the clothes.
       
      I put a few things in my trolley and then did a shop.
      I paid and was about to get into my car when the security guard stopped me and asked me to come back in.
       
      I did and they took me upstairs.
      I was mortified and said I forgot to scan the clothes and a conditioner, 5 items.
      I know its unacceptable but I was distracted and Initially hadn’t really planned to use scan and shop.
       
      No excuse.
      I offered to pay for the goods but the manager said it was too late.
      He looked at the CCTV and because I didn’t try to scan the items he was phoning the police.
       
      The cost of the items was about £40.
      I was crying at this point and told them I was a nurse, just coming from work and I could get struck off.
       
      They rang the police anyway and they came and issued me with a community resolution notice, which goes off my record in a year.
      I feel terrible. I have to declare this to my employer and NMC.
       
      They kept me in a room on my own with 4 staff and have banned me from all stores.
      The police said if I didn’t do the community order I would go to court and they would refer me to the PPS.
       
      I’m so stressed,
      can u appeal this or should I just accept it?
       
      Thanks for reading 
      • 7 replies
    • The courier industry – some basic points for customers. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421913-the-courier-industry-%E2%80%93-some-basic-points-for-customers/
      • 1 reply
    • The controversial sub-prime lender says the City watchdog is investigating its practices.
      View the full article
      • 0 replies
Shogun83

Sold car last year and sent logbook slip off... Now being pursued for not having insurance.

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1589 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

So I part exchanged my car in the middle of last year; sent off the slip to the DVLA and thought nothing more of it.

Then December last year I started getting letters from the DVLA etc saying my car wasn't insured. I sent off the proof of sale and they sent me a document telling me I was no longer the registered keeper.

 

So it seems like they never received the original paperwork and I'm now still being pursued for not having insurance for a car I have proof of sale of!

 

This seems ridiculous to me - do I really have to defend myself against this?!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which "slip" did you send off?

 

When selling/part exchanging a car, you have the new owner fill in their details on the v5 and hand the new owner the "slip" that remains and you send the v5 to the DVLA, who in turn, update ownership and send the new owner the new v5


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Which "slip" did you send off?

 

When selling/part exchanging a car, you have the new owner fill in their details on the v5 and hand the new owner the "slip" that remains and you send the v5 to the DVLA, who in turn, update ownership and send the new owner the new v5

 

 

That is the process for a private sale.

If it was part exchanged with the trade, it is different. The seller sends the completed 'Transferred to the Trade' slip from the V5C to the DVLA and gives the rest of the V5C to the trader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll have to check my current log book to see if I can remember exactly which. It was a part of the logbook that I completed; not anything else.

 

Thanks for your replies guys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So it seems like they never received the original paperwork and I'm now still being pursued for not having insurance for a car I have proof of sale of!

 

This seems ridiculous to me - do I really have to defend myself against this?!!

 

If the slip has gone missing, and you were still shown as the Registered Keeper, that will be why the DVLA are writing to you.

It is the Registered Keeper that commits the offence - s.144A, Road Traffic Act 1988.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I've proven I wasn't the owner at the time why are they still trying to enforce against me?

 

As I see it I have two options -

 

A) not guilty as I wasn't the owner of the vehicle

 

B) guilty by negligence - as I could have checked that the DVLA had updated their database

 

What do you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not the owner that commits the offence, it is the Registered Keeper. Which is why they are writing to you, being the Registered Keeper at the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is not the owner that commits the offence, it is the Registered Keeper. Which is why they are writing to you, being the Registered Keeper at the time.

 

thanks Radway - this is still hard to swallow!

 

I've already told them I'd made all reasonable efforts to register my car properly.

 

Seems like you're saying I should plead guilty as ridiculous as it feels to me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*Raykay (autocorrect sorry)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I sent off the proof of sale and they sent me a document telling me I was no longer the registered keeper.

 

 

Did the DVLA send you this document? if so, then the slip must have arrived


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did the DVLA send you this document? if so, then the slip must have arrived

 

That's the problem - I thought I'd had the acknowledgement letter but can't find it - so maybe the slip didn't get to the DVLA.

 

I got a letter from the DVLA in December so sent them my proof of sale document and got an acknowledgement letter then. I'd thought that was the end of it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cant find it now, have you tried asking DVLA to re send the letter acknowledging you are no longer the RK?


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you cant find it now, have you tried asking DVLA to re send the letter acknowledging you are no longer the RK?

 

They sent me a new one in January (recently dated) after I sent them the proof of sale,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And does this state that you are no longer the registered keeper or does it say you are no longer the owner?


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And does this state that you are no longer the registered keeper or does it say you are no longer the owner?

 

No longer the registered keeper (sorry for the delay)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, am i right in now thinking that the DVLA acknowledged in writing that you were not the RK when the alleged non insurance incident occurred?


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No they have backdated the "offence" to December :-(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No they have backdated the "offence" to December :-(

 

Even if you have no record of DVLA confirming the RK change, whoever you part exchanged the car with will be able to confirm in writing that they took the car on x date. They might even have record of what happened to the car.

 

Get this information to whoever is threatening prosecution and it should be stopped. You cannot Insure a car that is no longer yours or in your possession.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even if you have no record of DVLA confirming the RK change, whoever you part exchanged the car with will be able to confirm in writing that they took the car on x date. They might even have record of what happened to the car.

 

Get this information to whoever is threatening prosecution and it should be stopped. You cannot Insure a car that is no longer yours or in your possession.

 

The date that the vehicle was exchanged would not be relevant. The offence is contrary to s.144A, Road Traffic Act 1988 - that the vehicle does not meet the insurance requirements of the act - for which the Registered Keeper is liable.

Not the offence of not having insurance, s.143 of the same act - for which the user is liable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shogun can you confirm if the letters you are getting regarding this are saying if you have contravened any part of the RTA as raykay is pointing out. ?

Whether it is or isnt could well determine how to approach dealing with it


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

 

 

 

GEMHL Settled

Barclaycard Settled

A & L SETTLED IN FULL :lol:

Spml Reluctantly withdrawn

Blackhorse pre 31-7-06 Demand removal sent 23 8 06. ICO ordered removal jan 2007....REMOVED:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The date that the vehicle was exchanged would not be relevant. The offence is contrary to s.144A, Road Traffic Act 1988 - that the vehicle does not meet the insurance requirements of the act - for which the Registered Keeper is liable.

Not the offence of not having insurance, s.143 of the same act - for which the user is liable

 

If they no longer had the car, how could they insure it ?

 

People would cancel any insurance on the date of part exchange and send off the V5 slip to DVLA.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The date that the vehicle was exchanged would not be relevant. The offence is contrary to s.144A, Road Traffic Act 1988 - that the vehicle does not meet the insurance requirements of the act - for which the Registered Keeper is liable.

Not the offence of not having insurance, s.143 of the same act - for which the user is liable

 

S.144A is when there is a problem that the Insurance arranged is not valid ?

 

S.143 is about using a vehicle without Insurance.

 

Unless i am misreading RTA ?


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
S.144A is when there is a problem that the Insurance arranged is not valid ?

 

Unless i am misreading RTA ?

 

There needs to be insurance in force - s.144A, complying with (2) - (5). The registered keeper is liable if there is not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There needs to be insurance in force - s.144A, complying with (2) - (5). The registered keeper is liable if there is not.

 

OK, but then it seems that s.144B may well apply ?

 

They neither owned or were using the vehicle. Surely, if they can evidence that, then they should not be prosecuted, because you cannot maintain Insurance on any vehicke after selling it. The RTA act cannot mandate something that is not possible.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OK, but then it seems that s.144B may well apply ?

 

Unfortunately, none of the exemptions in s.144B apply in the OP's case.

 

The insurance is not required to be taken out by the Registered Keeper to comply with s.144A, but they are liable if there is no insurance that complies with s.144A.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...