Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robinson Way Court Claim and Application for Summary Judgment


alan7181
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3020 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I subscribe to Noddle a free credit score and report checking service. I can see that Robinson Way accessed my credit file in November. It is about a debt I had with egg about 9 years ago although I continued to pay £5 a month until 2011 so not statue barred. I had just managed to get a good score as the previous default occurred so long ago. They have started legal action again which means that a debt taken out in 2004 which defaulted around 2006 will be shown on my credit file for another 6 years if they are successful with the legal case. So all in all 12 years of no credit for me at sensible rates. This cannot be what the government intended with CCA legislation. Also can Robinson Way access my credit file without my consent ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do you mean... "They have started legal action again " ?

 

Has a claim already been issued on this debt and what was the outcome ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Confusing?

 

They cannot 'add' another default marker on your file, if it has already dropped off due to its age.

 

The default marker is nearly always reported on your file by the OC, and only reflects the DCA's name when they chase it or own it.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume they accessed my file to see if it was worth taking legal action. As my credit file now looks good they have issued legal proceedings. They are currently seeking a Summary Judgement as the defence I submitted did not give a sufficient defence. I was struggling to find a defence as I did borrow the money and was unable to apy it back (and still am).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to know who can access your credit file without your consent. Can I find my neighbours credit score ? Can I discover what loans my brother has taken out ? I thought you had to give consent before anyone could access your credit file e.g. when you apply for a loan you have to give consent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't need your permission to access your CRF as the permission will have been granted on the sale of the debt too them.

 

If you have been issued with a summons then you need to act, when did you receive it? what are the POC? what defence did you submit before in order for them to issue proceedings against you?

 

Have you acknowledged the claim yet?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I cant find the original claim form but here is my defence as submitted.I"t is denied that Mr................ entered into an agreement and

borrowed money from egg on or about Jannuary 16 2004.

Egg is not a company or a legal entity.

It is denied that any agreement exists to transfer the benefit of

any such agreement to Arrow Global Ltd.

It is denied that £5000 is now due to Arrow Global Ltd from Mr A

Naylor.

Any such agreement would in any case be now over 11 years old and

time barred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I should add that they since sent a comprehensive set of documents including the assignments, the account statements showing my recent £5 per month payments etc. I don't seem to have the full original loan agreement only a copy of the first page with my signature. I don't have the full terms and conditions which state that the loan can be transferred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the correct forum

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is hurting my head....

 

OK we've established that they can search and look at your CRF without your permission, which is what you originally asked.

 

Now you're saying they have issued a claim against you, you've responded and denied any liability and that, amongst other things, it's time barred.

 

But in the next sentence say they have sent you a comprehensive set of documents, and showing your £5 a month payments?

Including a signed copy of your CCA?

 

But you still deny liability?

 

If you didn't have any agreement with them, nor signed any agreement, then you should speak too the Police and report ID theft.

 

OR, you did have an agreement with them?

Most, if not ALL agreements, will state that they are entitled to pass or sell on the account to a third party for collection.

 

I'm struggling to see what your intent is with this?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved again in view of the application for Summary Judgment....Financial Legal Issues.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I cant find the original claim form but here is my defence as submitted.I"t is denied that Mr................ entered into an agreement and

borrowed money from egg on or about Jannuary 16 2004.

Egg is not a company or a legal entity.

It is denied that any agreement exists to transfer the benefit of

any such agreement to Arrow Global Ltd.

It is denied that £5000 is now due to Arrow Global Ltd from Mr A

Naylor.

Any such agreement would in any case be now over 11 years old and

time barred.

 

 

You are going to have to let us know what has gone on with this account in order for us to advise correctly.

 

 

You say that the debt is time barred - this can only be so if you have made no payments or acknowledged liability for 6 years (plus a couple of months) from the last payment.

 

 

According to you, you have been making payments up to 2011 ?

 

 

Have a read of the link below and let us have the information requested - we can then move forward.

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

 

If they have applied for summary judgment then they believe they have a darn good bet on winning their claim.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

In 2004 I took out credit card with egg. In 2006 I agreed a payment plan with egg of £5 per month which I paid until 2011. In November 2014 Robinson Way accessed my credit file. I thought permission to access a credit file once granted only lasted for a fixed time say 6 years then had to be re-applied for. I know RBS once asked me for permission to renew even though I had given it once.

They then issued legal proceedings in Nov 2015. I sent the defence already shown in this thread. They have now issued a request for summary judgement. they have sent a comprehensive set of documents including the assignments, the account statements showing my recent £5 per month payments etc. I don't seem to have the full original loan agreement only a copy of the first page with my signature. I don't have the full terms and conditions which state that the loan can be transferred. Can they still get a summary judgement without the loan agreement terms and condition showing it to be assignable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once the debt was sold/ assigned, then the New owner of the account would have the right to access your credit files. I wouldn't think there is a fixed time for creditors being able to access your account - it will likely be reasonable to assume that whilst you owe them money - they can check your files.

 

 

If you were making payments up until 2011 - then the debt is NOT statute barred.

 

 

Based on the defence you posted up - I can see why they have applied for Summary Judgment - this is because they consider that you don't actually have a defence - if you believe you do, then you need to submit a witness statement disputing their SJ at least 7 days (I think) before the hearing is to take place.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

to avoid summary, need to show 'triable' issues/'reasonable grounds/prospect' etc. as per CPR part 24 and associated PD.

seems it is not likely to be barred.

maybe then re execution (validity) of the agreement, with regard to the then s127 (3)(4) Con Credit Act?

service of a compliant default notice?

anything else

Link to post
Share on other sites

"maybe then re execution (validity) of the agreement, with regard to the then s127 (3)(4) Con Credit Act?

service of a compliant default notice?

anything else"

 

 

I take it you are saying they should have issued a default notice and it should be included in the court papers. I have checked all the papers they have sent and there doesn't appear to be a Default Notice. is that what you are saying ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

"maybe then re execution (validity) of the agreement, with regard to the then s127 (3)(4) Con Credit Act?

service of a compliant default notice?

anything else"

 

 

I take it you are saying they should have issued a default notice and it should be included in the court papers. I have checked all the papers they have sent and there doesn't appear to be a Default Notice. is that what you are saying ?

a def notice at the time of default from the original creditor is usually required if it was re s87...

the full claim details are needed though to help fully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alan, its established that this debt is not SB'd, that kills that side of your defence.

 

Robinson Way can access your credit file if its been assigned to them.

 

Every £5 payment you made up to 2011, restarted the 6 year clock, had you continued paying it would still be another 6 years.

 

The bottom line is that because you have been making payments, you have acknowledged that the debt exists, otherwise why would you have been paying it?

 

The defence you have submitted will be blown out of the water and this is why they have applied for summary judgement, which they will get.

 

Game over for you on this one i think, at least for the next 6 years while the ccj is on your file, unless you have any other defence.

 

I really cant see there is anything else you can do other than accept that you will have a ccj.

 

The outcome may have been different had you posted when you received the summons where help and advice could have taken you down a different route.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

fair point. they made the application re the defence already submitted.

things not mentioned in a defence (which therefore may not be considered. up to the J) may need to be sneaked in...

depends on the circs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found the claim form it states

"the claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the defendant (s) under a contract between the defendant(s) and Egg dated on or around Jan 16 2004 and assigned to the claimant on feb 28 2013.

Particulars a/c no .............(I have blanked this out but it is shown on claim form)

Date 3/8/2013 Default Balance value £5000 Post Refrl Cr Nil

TOTAL 5000.00"

 

 

That is all that is stated on Claim Form. The full application for summary judgement is around 50 pages and would be difficult to upload to this forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand why my defence that without the full terms and conditions of the loan it is not possiblke to prove that the loan could be assigned is a non starter. My defence states that it is not proven that the debt has ben legally assigned. Where have they shown that the assignment is valid. ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want sight of that document then you should/could send a SAR OR, CPR 31.14 (I think?) to view what documents they have to rely on in court to win and get a CCJ against you.

 

However, I think your time would be better spent going over your income and expenditure, making a copy for the DJ, so you can make a realistic offer of payment on the day, instead of being told what you will pay each week/month.

 

It is more than likely that the OC sent you all of those docs prior to the sale of the account.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...