Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

reclaiming catalogue fees


Tigerbird45
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2620 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you so much dx

 

i never thought £244 would become £1,650 just with 39.9% compound interest added

 

so if I copy this and aproched Studio and ask them for this money to be returned

 

on who's authorities

 

because it's unfair

 

thanks dx Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 130
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx some good reading

 

 

I will prepare a letter to reclaim the defaults tomorrow for the full £1,900 and also remind them I could reclaim back to 1993

 

 

I'll send a copy of 1993 statement for prove also the have no Cca signed by myself

 

 

I have not agreed to anything also that I have been a good customer since 1993 plus my medical condition condition get this wrote up thanks dx Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi guys n gals

 

sent my request off last Friday for my be faults back

 

I've had a few Red statements throw from Studio for myself to pay

 

I've had 3 SAR packs now n two credit agreements signed by Studio but NOT signed be myself

 

to night just had a telephone call from Studio asking me to pay my account

 

I informed the lady that what is happening myself sending a letter asking for my defaults back which she remarked that when you buy from Studio you agree to pay interest n defaults if missed payments as my credit agreement

 

I told her Studio donot have a valid credit agreement by myself she put my account on hold till 27/02/16

 

thanks guys mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I'd stay off that phone

 

What dates are on those 2 agreements

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

 

 

they phoned me

I didn't know the number so answered it ,

 

 

the is only one date on both copy's that's at the top says consumer credit act 1974

Studio have signed it no date when signed

no dignities by myself on ether

but Studio have wrote my name and address on top off one

 

 

I have never signed any agreement

 

 

I also ask in future I would like to be contacted by post

they still say my account started on 21/11/06

 

 

But not of the first list of transactions show account started 01/01/92

 

 

I sent my request for repayment of deefaults on 17/01/16 and gave Studio 14 days to reply thanks sir Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

a compliant CCA return MUST have a date.

and if this stems from a 1992 account

def need a signature

someone is telling porkies

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

 

well I asked for a copy of my credit agreement meaning agreement signed and dated by myself

 

Studio odviously they do not have one

 

the copy's they have sent are just waste of time do suppose they can put a default on my credit history

or take me to court without a valid credit agreement

 

they have put a hold on my account till 27 Feb

 

so I'll see what happens if nowt then I'll think about the ombudsman

 

 

thanks dx Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

mate rang me today I was out

 

 

I asked them to only mail me surely Studio know they need a signed n dated credit agreement by me

not having that means I haven't agreed to anything

defaults adding interest anything

 

 

Studio say once you order an item and start paying for it means you agree to all the terms

 

 

thanks Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

not for a 1992 account start date.

next time

ask them when they think you took the account out in the first place?

 

but as already said...

 

they can default etc etc, they don't need a signed agreement.

a recon will suffice meeting the requirements of the consumer credit act

HOWEVER, to enforce through a court - they will need a copy of your SIGNED agreement as its pre Apr 2007 take up.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

penalty charges reclaim is considered a complaint

they have 56 days.

 

 

unless you threatened court which you ideally should not do unless you are prepared to follow through

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dunno what did you say in your letter?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you cant do that

you have to wait the 8 weeks

the FOS will simply bounce you away.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

 

 

got letter this morning from Studios complaints handler saying I am in receipt of your letter

and can confirm a copy of the credit agreement was sent to you which is sent to all of our customers

therefore did not have your signature on it.

 

 

Just reminding myself why default charges are applied n they charge these fees to help cover the cost incurred

but however the credit agreement allows Studio to apply default charges in payment

as these are less than the pre estimated costs to Studio

 

 

they do not agree these default charges are unfair.

That's it than mate thanks Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm no

 

 

what did you expect them to say?

 

 

rollover give in?

 

 

now your fight begins.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a few ideas here yes...

 

 

 

in reply to their letter:

with regard to your letter of the 30th.

i thank you for the gesture of goodwill

in relation toward the refund of your unlawful penalty charges

however, i beg to differ upon your points raised

concerning your interpretation of the OFT statement.

It is perfectly evident that it applies to ALL types of

consumer credit agreements, else why are

all the major credit cards companies & indeed

other catalogue companies, including yourselves

settling complaints of this nature?

it is also worthy to note, that the statement was a recommendation

of £12, not permission to charge such a penalty.

When & if you truthfully disclose your actual costs

then perhaps consumers might have a better faith in the industry.

i now move to the matter of the interest you have charged me

on these penalty charges.

in line with the std FOS calculation, you have failed

to place me back in the position i would

have been, had you not levied such charges,

You have omitted to include the interest you have charged me

on each day for each charge.

Having already prepared the documents required should

i take the option to take you to court, i have included

a repeat copy of my schedule of charges.

from the total detailed i have removed your refunded sum.

i will give you 14 days before i decide my next move.

However, either way, be this court or the FOS, this will increase

your costs by adding a further 8% statutory interest to my claim.

Having consulted information provided by the FOS

i am also advised to inform you of their fees levied

upon the company under investigation - £450

i sincerely hope we can resolve my claim

without further involvement.

however, please be advised i will not hesitate

in escalating this complaint should it not

be resolved to my satisfaction.

yours

disgrutled customer

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its one from a cag thread somewhere here

 

 

just remember to delete stuff not applicable to your situation.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...