Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Vodafone Complaint WRT135 ref #11332938


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3160 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning,

 

I have an ongoing dispute with Vodafone, they are not budging, and I would like some advice if possible.

 

Last autumn (2014) I had some financial difficulties, so I contacted Vodafone to say that I was struggling. The advisor offered to set up a £30 a month payment plan to bring the account back in order, which at the time was greatly appreciated.

 

At the end of the month I contacted them again to make the first payment and was told that the information was on the notes, but the advisor did not process the payment plan, and now it is too late to make payment as the debt was with a collection company.

 

I tried to pay vodafone for 3-4 weeks, but they refused to take payment as the debt was no longer with them. I complained about this and was told by a manager that they would request the account back from the collection company as I should have had a payment plan in place. The collection company declined the request.

 

In December 2014, a default was applied to my account. I complained about this again, and a different manager told me that I should pay the collection company in full and vodafone would refund the £10 difference (which they did) and that the default would be removed from my file (It never got removed).

 

Since then I have been told on several occasions that this can be seen on my notes and they will get the default removed. This has never happened. Now the credit team are stating that the default was correctly applied and nothing can be done.

 

I'm ready to give up to be honest, but need some advice on whether or not there is any point in continuing this fight.

 

Cheers

 

Russ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

I'm afraid this is standard procedure for the customer services. Lee can help but this should have been sorted sooner. I would go as far as saying that they have placed the default unlawfully as you had set up an arrangement to pay which does show on the system files although not actioned. This is Purely VFs fault.

 

Just because a debt collector is involved means nothing as VF don't have their own debt collecting team. What they do is ask a DCA to act on their behalf. This does not negate the responsibility to deal with you. They are just passing the buck,

 

In the meantime, you can add a notice of correction against the default (up to 200 words) explaining what has gone wrong and your side of this sorry tale.

 

A default is placed when a creditor considers the relationship has broken down and they consider you a lost cause (I am beginning to wonder if this was an automated procedure).

 

This default (based on what you have said) is not a true representation of your situation and should not have been placed. What they should have done (at the most) is to place AP on your credit file.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the fact that they won't investigate the circumstances, only the missed payments.

 

They told me on phone that they will deal with their staff who messed up internally and other than that nothing can be done.

 

That sounds like an admission of error there

Link to post
Share on other sites

No....Wait until Lee contacts you etc!

 

It might not be an admission there, but if their error has caused your problems then it needs to be dealt with PROPERLY

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received an interesting phone call from Vodafone.

 

End result from them is the decision remains the same, however, she stated that the advisor DID agree a payment plan but did not action it. She also confirmed that a manager DID agree that this was wrong, and requested the account back from the debt collection team.

 

In fact, every statement made in my original post has been confirmed, but still there is nothing the so called quality assurance team will do about it - all they see is 4 missed payments (was only 2 when I declared financial difficulties).

 

I'm still hoping things can be sorted, but confidence is starting to falter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

While any dispute was ongoing, no action should have been taken on the account so in my opinion, the default was placed wrongly as it was after you raised your complaint by phone. Stop ringing them and deal via mail (or email)

 

This is the email address that I have for the UK CEO

 

[email protected]

 

and this one for the big boss

 

[email protected]

 

I would email them both.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Done. Hopefully I get a reply via email rather than a phone call.

 

Good morning,

 

Firstly I would like to apologise for contacting this email address directly, however, I have hit a dead end in this case and would like it resolving as soon as possible with vodafone.

 

I am writing to make a further complaint, in addition to any previous complaint I have made so far.

My name is *****

Account Number *****

My old vodafone number was *****

And my postcode was *****

I would like to make a few points regarding my account which I feel is wrongly in default on my credit file, and I feel I am being ignored over this matter and brushed aside by Vodafone.

 

Please take time to read this email in its entirety and consider my points. I would like to give Vodafone one last chance to reconsider the default before taking this to the ombudsmen.

 

In late 2014 I telephoned Vodafone customer service as I was struggling to pay my bill. The kind gentleman on the customer service desk agreed a payment scheme over the phone for £30 a month until the debt was clear. At the time this was a great weight off of my mind and much apprecitated, however, things werent as they seemed. At the end of October I phoned Vodafone to make the £30 payment as agreed, and was told by your customer service staff that they can see that the other member of staff had made notes about agreeing the payment scheme, but didnt actually action it. This was confirmed today on the telephone to a different member of staff. (The lady on the phone today stated that the default will remain and the member of staff who misadvised me at the time will be dealt with internally)

 

At this point the account was not with a debt collection agency. If this ‘advisor’ had told me that he could not sort out a payment plan for me, I would have done anything to get this account sorted, i.e borrowed from parents, friends, payday loan etc.

 

By the time I attempted to make my first £30 payment it was apparantly too late as the account had been transferred to a debt collection company. At this point I asked to speak to a manager and made a complaint with regards to my account going to the debt collection company even though a payment scheme had been agreed. I was told at this point that he was going to try and get the account back from the debt collection company, a request that was denied by the debt collection company.

 

In December 2014, after much debate over my account, a default was registered. This left me angry and upset with Vodafone as I felt I had been unjustly treated by the company. I made several attempts to pay Vodafone the outstanding balance of approximately £180 but Vodafone staff outright refused to take any payment. These attempted payments occured before and after the default was applied.

 

I made a complaint at this point as a payment scheme had been agreed but not actioned and Vodafone were refusing to take payment. A manager contacted me saying that he apologised for what had happened, told me to pay the debt collection company the full amount and he would refund my account the difference (approx £10 - which he did) and that the default would be removed from my account and would take up to 28 days to reflect on my credit file.

 

I have since made multiple calls and enquiries into why this default is still on my credit file but I keep getting told that it was correctly applied due to late payment. I disagree with this outcome as like I stated earlier in my email, a payment scheme had been agreed to get the account back in order.

 

This email is last attempt at requesting that Vodafone remove the default due to the original payment scheme not being applied, being told on multiple occasions that the default would be removed, and the fact that vodafone refused to take full payment of the account prior to the default being applied.

 

At present this email address is the only way of contacting me, as I am currently working in Saudi Arabia. I hope you will reconsider all the details, and come to the right decision regarding my credit file.

 

I’d like to personally thank you for reading this email, and hope this can be resolved.

 

Kind Regards,

 

*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

He May be on holiday. But he will be back soon.

I know you are in a "Rush" to sort this out. But at this time, you need to be a little more patient.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did Lee say? Just the usual "Looking into it , will be in contact?"

 

Thats usually fine :)

 

Lee has more pull the generic front desk monkeys :p... *Sorry Vodafone Customer Service Staff...*

 

Let him do what he needs to do.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the email I have recieved, but for some reason he cannot see the information I had off of the advisor today. At least now I have the default notice date to work with as the payment plan was organised on the telephone prior to October 2014. Any information is helpful should I need to go further. Thanks for recommending Lee everyone :)

 

Thanks for your email.

I've checked your account and can see that you made a payment of £** on 2 October 2014. However, there's no record of a payment plan being agreed to.

Due to the overdue balance remaining, your account was cancelled for non-payment on 3 October and a default notice letter was sent to you 13 October.

As we received no further payment or contact from you, your account was referred to a debt collection agency on 27 October.

The default relates to your bills from between July and October 2014, which weren't paid until 15 January 2015. As we believe that the default has been recorded correctly, we're unable to remove it from your credit file.

Kind regards,

Lee

Social Media Comms

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...