Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all! I've now had a "final notification letter" through from ECP. I assume I should continue to ignore this, but is there likely any action I need to take? Do you need to see a copy of the letter? Thanks
    • Please will you upload the defence in a PDF format document
    • Afternoon All - after 3 weeks of silence, this morning I received an email from HMCTS advising that P2G have rejected my claim. Decide whether to proceed Parcel2Go.com has rejected your claim. You need to decide whether to proceed with the claim. You need to respond before 4pm on 25 June 2024. Your claim won’t continue if you don’t respond by then. This is their ‘defence’ Their defence Why they disagree with the claim When choosing a service on the Defendants website, the Claimant chose to book their order with Evri and selected to take out £20 parcel protection which comes with the service. On the first page of the booking process, the Claimant entered the value of £265 for the contents and was offered parcel protection for loss or damages against their goods for £13.99 + VAT. The Claimant selected no, which then produced a pop up which explained 'We strongly recommend that you protect the full value of your item(s).' however, the Claimant still did not take this protection out and instead continued with the booking process. At the end of the booking process, the Claimant was offered this again which was refused and the Claimant continued with the booking by accepting the terms and conditions which re-iterates the information provided in the booking process. The parcel was sent, however, seems to be delayed in transit. The parcel finally started to track again, however, when delivered the parcel was empty with no contents. As such, the claim was re-opened and attempted to be settled for the £20 protection taken out in the booking process. This was refused by the Claimant as they felt they should be paid the full amount of the value entered when booking. Unfortunately, due to the refusal of the parcel protection in the booking process the Defendant is not liable to settle the claim to the value and only to the parcel protection taken out. The Defendant shall rely on the Terms and Conditions of carriage in particular section 9. The Defendant understands that the contents have not be handled with due care and attention, which is not being disputed, however, they are disputing the amount they are liable to. They have requested mediation, I’m sure not least to drag the case out even longer, but I can see no benefit to me in this and so shall reject it. As ever, I’d welcome your thoughts guys. g59   
    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old debts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3129 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have had a pile of old debts

, being very old and very cynical,

at pension age I made the çoncious decision to stop paying any and all of them.

 

I challenged every debter to take me to court, they didn't

, preferring to sell on debts to collectors

 

None of these took me to court,so here I am over six years later which should mean no more chasing from collectors,

 

however one chasing debt company has insisted I made a payment against one of the debts three years ago.

I challenged that knowing I had not.

 

They then advised that the payment had come from the debt owner.for repayment of charges or something and made to the debt collector intstead of to me??

 

How can this be taken as a payment from me??

 

Now I have another item which needs to be repaid

, but the debt owner wants to pay it against a debt which is past collectible date

. What is the legal position.

This is a business debt and debtor ,

 

I never tried for charges reclaiming and there were loads, because it was a business. Now they say it wasn't. Ten years later. Dahhhh.

 

Any helpful information on the situation regard to debt over six years and what the legal position of debt and debtor would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stature barred relates to actions by you e.g payment or acknowledgement of debt. So some internal payment between creditors does not stop the debt being statute barred and unenforceable.

 

Business debt also likely to be statute barred, but can you say exactly what it involves e. Rent, goods purchased.

 

As you know creditors and debt buyers can lie about matters claiming all sorts of legal positions which are false. So don't go making payments for these old debts. If they can take it to court, why have they not done so after all these years. They probably can't.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, you confirmed my thinking and I have disgarded the item concerned.

Second question I may not hàve made clear.

Have old bank debt, I always thought unclaimable because of limited status. This old debt won't go away, but now over the six years, again no payments from me, but now quite a sum of PPI has appeared and they want my permission to pay off this old account. It's over the 6 years. They are maintaining it was a partnership, I have a copy letter disproving this ,but imnot clear on what happens to an out of date debt, its not enforceable, but does it still exist??and how?? And when does it stop existing and become. Write off therefore no debt??

Would be glad of enlightenment thanks so

Link to post
Share on other sites

This, that's another fear to bed, but legally when if ever will the debt be written off or is the bánk going to keep it in its computer store forever and therefor always be àble to clàim payments meànt for me??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, you confirmed my thinking and I have disgarded the item concerned.

Second question I may not hàve made clear.

Have old bank debt, I always thought unclaimable because of limited status. This old debt won't go away, but now over the six years, again no payments from me, but now quite a sum of PPI has appeared and they want my permission to pay off this old account. It's over the 6 years. They are maintaining it was a partnership, I have a copy letter disproving this ,but imnot clear on what happens to an out of date debt, its not enforceable, but does it still exist??and how?? And when does it stop existing and become. Write off therefore no debt??

Would be glad of enlightenment thanks so

 

I think i would write back asking for the PPI refund as a cheque payment made out in your name and refuse permission for it being applied to the old account. The PPI refund is due to a miss sold insurance product and nothing to do with account as such.

 

In regard to the accounts which are in debt, these are statute barred so cannot be enforced in court. Not sure why they are raising issues about partnership. They had 6 years to enforce the debt and have not done so.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Partnership issues raised because I have argued for years that it was not a partnership but Ltd comp. Bank have always maintained it was a partnership. Im sick because if I had known they considered the accounts partnerships then I would have claimed the charges back on the accounts. The bánk charges were very very high. But that's another story.

Suffice to say I'll write to the bánk and refuse permission for anything due to me to be paid elsewhere. I'll see what they say.

But still no one says what happens to these old accounts. They are supposed to be taken off credit reference files, but what do the banks do,

I'm sure they get written off as a bad debt, but no one here seems to say so!

 

Thanks for help anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Partnership issues raised because I have argued for years that it was not a partnership but Ltd comp. Bank have always maintained it was a partnership. Im sick because if I had known they considered the accounts partnerships then I would have claimed the charges back on the accounts. The bánk charges were very very high. But that's another story.

Suffice to say I'll write to the bánk and refuse permission for anything due to me to be paid elsewhere. I'll see what they say.

But still no one says what happens to these old accounts. They are supposed to be taken off credit reference files, but what do the banks do,

I'm sure they get written off as a bad debt, but no one here seems to say so!

 

Thanks for help anyway��

Old unenforceable debts do get written off and they won't appear on credit records after 6 years. They are not recorded in any way as a black marker, as they are not allowed to do that beyond the limitations period.

 

But you can never rule out Banks sellng old debts to debt collection agencies, who may try to chase to see what luck they have.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the other way around

 

If you know debts to be unenforceable or statue barred.......why

Enter into pointless letter tennis?????? Ignore them totally.....!!!

 

If anyone was stupid enough to file a claim

They'd lose hands down.

 

Just remember in e&w SB simply means any judgement would be time barred

They can ask for payment

You can ask them to go away

 

No letter tennis!!!!

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Bank agreed two quite large amounts of repayable PPI

 

sent me settlement letters and told me they were keeping it and transferring cash to their collection dept to go against these old debt,

 

That's a damn chocker, but even though statute. Barred they still maintain they hold an old debt and have a right to offset these sums.

 

Any thoughts on there that I may have a chance of getting something

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope

A statute barred debt in e&w still exists

Just simply removes judicial enforcement option

 

Unless they have sold the debt and thus their rights

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...