Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update - Still receiving emails and letters - but have been getting text messages too. nothing aggressive just asking me to get in touch.    the text makes it look like it from the bank on first glance - it reads -   'the banks name' would like to dicuss our recent communication...etc... then lists IDR phone number and email FYI - reporting them as spam
    • Hello, After seeing all of the posts about BMW on here I really wish I hadn't even considered them! I bought a used car from them over the weekend, one specifically which had a reversing camera and cruise control in the advert. I was foolish at the time of purchase and didn't check to see these functions work on the test drive (totally my fault). Now that the car is home I've checked and checked and neither of these functions are available. I even checked on Parkers and it seems that no Skoda Kamiq '21 models come with any parking cameras at all. When buying the car, I was told all that was needed was 'Four signatures and £500' to secure it. I was never shown any of the documents, and instead the sales rep opened a box on his iPad and asked me to sign. He had been complaining about the length of time some customers take these days all throughout my time with him. (Again) foolishly I signed. In my email inbox I now have four attachments from BMW, one of which is my signature under a letter which basically says that the cars don't need to match the advertisements online, or have any of the features that a sales rep talks about. I realise that I've made mistakes in not doing my due diligence here, but thought I might as well ask the experts here if I have any rights left to claim that the car was miss-advertised, or if I unknowingly signed them away? Thanks in advance
    • where was this PCN:? please complete: pers i cant see the point in an sar yet await/if they ever send a letter of claim. as long as you've not moved since 2022 you are OK to totally ignore . dx  
    • ah this is a B2B PCP then as your are sending the SAR as a private individual and not as repping the co. you need to prove to them. unfortunately, i think that will also reset the 30 days. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefit fraud.


toffee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3222 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Received a letter today asking me to attend an interview under caution next week.

 

I'm unemployed but my wife works part time 24 hours a week

we claim tax credits and get help with housing and council tax

 

 

,then the new law came in where you had to work 30+ hours

I can't find work so wife took about prt time job.

 

 

She started just covering the odd shift around March as this wasn't permanent

and wasn't going to be till September when the person doing the job went to uni.

 

 

when the job became hers in September I waited 2 weeks then wrote a letter to benefits inclosing 2 pay slips.

That was the end of it,

 

 

nearly 2 years later benefits write to us asking to provide pay slips,

so we send the stuff off they wanted.

 

 

I then receive a letter about overpayment on housing and council benefits also wanted to no wife's start date on 2nd job

,thought this was strange.

 

 

I rang them up and they informed me they didn't no my wife had a 2nd job,

 

 

I told them I sent a letter to inform them and 2 pay slips,they said they never received anything.

 

I got the date my wife started 2 hd job sent that plus the p65

 

 

week later received more letters saying we owed over 3k,

 

 

spoke again on the phone due to them not knowing about the 2nd job we owed this money.

 

 

They asked if I wanted to appeal it I said it was a waste of time as its my word against there's regarding the letter,

 

 

I no for a fact I sent it,

 

 

so they misplaced it or lost in post

 

 

I was also told cause I'm not appealing it won't go any further.

 

 

i was told the pay back plan and been paying this since,

 

 

now 8 months later called in for interview

 

Anyone offer any advice for me as I'm bricking them,the only thing I'm at fault with is not declaring the work she did before the job came permament.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interview under caution means anything you say can be used against you, so I would take advice. My first point of call would be ringing CAB and see if they advise a solicitor, or if they have one that can assist you.

 

I would not go to an interview under caution alone due to the fact that its being recorded and its under caution.

 

Ring CAB tomorrow and get advice on it asap, they will help you and make sure you do not incriminate yourself further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to add the appointment can be cancelled and rearranged to allow you more time to seek advice, and in future, always send anything to the DWP by recorded delivery or special delivery, and keep the posting receipt/tracking details.

 

Getting legal advice, can often diffuse any serious problems with the DWP and they will know the best way to go about the situation. So, try not to worry too much (easy to say) but get help with it as this help will make it easier for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

was it suggested to you that not appealing would lead to a more favourable outcome - no prosecution?

 

Yes that's the impression I got when I spoke on the phone

Link to post
Share on other sites

Toffee, is there definitely nothing else it can be? It seems odd to pull you in for something that has already been sorted out previously?

 

That's what it says on the letter,failing to inform about wife's 2 hd job

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke to cab and all they advised was to contact a solicitor as criminal proceedings may be against me,so now trying to find a solicitor who offer the free 30 mins service as I can't afford to pay for one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you get legal aid? You really want to take a solicitor with you. Im not trying to scare you, so don't let it, but based on what you say at the interview can decide if it goes further or not.

 

A solicitor will always be able to diffuse things and stop you incriminating yourself, and remember what you do say cannot be taken back because its being recorded.

 

I am really surprised they are doing this since there is an active payment plan.

 

Definitely speak to a solicitor, and they may be able to advise if you are entitled to legal aid based on any income you have coming in.

 

Don't be frightened, just be prepared. Legal help will make things a lot easier for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got an appointment with a solicitor tomorrow at 12-30 one of those free 30 mins ones so hopfully can get some advice on what to do,fingers crossed I can get help and they can come with me.I will never be sending letters ect again without been recorded just not worth it.

 

Like I say only thing really going against me is I never declared the temp work she did before getting the permament hours,also if I was going to commit benefit fraud I wouldn't have sent the pay slips for her 2nd job when they asked for them so they could update there records.

 

Maybe they want to prosecute me as I appealed a decision few years ago in court and I won,they claimed I never informed them of changes but I pointed out the cab sent a income and expentirse form they claimed they never.Case was ajorrned for an hour while benefits contacted there office.When they returned they had the form that cab sent them and the case was thrown out.

 

So again I informed them and they claimed I never and I was right,maybe this could work in my favor

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure you mention being pressured not to appeal with the carrot of no prosecution - that is a really appalling thing to do with serious ramifications for the LA.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is the letter from, is it the council, or the benefits agency, or Inland Revenue?

 

Also, who is it you are paying back, the council or the benefits agency or Inland Revenue?

 

Is this a case of you are paying back overpaid rent/council tax, but now the DWP or Inland Revenue are getting you in about overpaid income related benefits or tax credits?

 

Either way, it isn't enough to warrant court action as far as I can tell, its better for them to just recover debts of this amount.

 

As already said though, a solicitor will be a great help to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the council benefits department that have called me in,it's an over payment for housing and council tax benefits with this happening we have had to let a few council tax bills go to court so they can set up a repayment plan for us.Weve just been hit with another £200 overpayment of council tax bill as well which where not sure what to do with that one.

 

I am not sure who where paying back,I just no each week so much is taken from our payments to repay the money back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its quite confusing, if, the council have called you in, even though they already have a payment plan set up with you.

 

Im pretty sure the solicitor tomorrow will know what to do and will definitely question why they are asking you to go in, if its about the exact same thing you

are already paying back.

 

Id just wait it out until tomorrow and see what the solicitor suggests.

 

Its not like they can accuse you of doing something they already know about and that you are currently repaying back to them is it?

 

Just try not to worry, get all of your info, and any paper work ready for tomorrow to show the solicitor, and also maybe write down a few things that the solicitor might need to know, like when

this all happened, what was said on both sides, and how it is already being repaid.

 

Hopefully its something that can easily be explained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

They can still interview you about an overpayment you are already paying back - the recovery is without prejudice to any further action.

However, 8 months after the overpayment is calculated seems like a long delay & your solicitor may well question this.

As regards court action, different councils have different prosecution policies - some publish them on their website.

My best advice would be write down events in the order they happened ahead of seeing your solicitor as that will help you get the most out of a consultation.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you notified your wife's start date, did you tell them the date she became permanent (September) or the date she started doing the odd shift (March)

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you notified your wife's start date, did you tell them the date she became permanent (September) or the date she started doing the odd shift (March)

 

 

told them the date she started permament

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been to see the solicitor basically if I want them to attend going to cost me £300,hes advised me to attend the interview and don't admit to the 6 months previous unless they have evidence of it,they said its up to the benefits to prove they never received my letter.They seem to think they've been in touch with inland and seen the wife's worked before I informed them,so if they want to do me then they can only do me for the work before September unless they can prove they never received my letter.

 

What should go in my favor in the previous case that went to court when yet again they claimed they never received a form from cab when in fact they found it on the day of my court case.

 

Rang the benefits and I now have my interview tomorrow morning,so will just need to keep calm don't get flustered and be honest with them and hope for the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had more time, then I am sure the CAB could have arranged for someone to go with you if you are unable to pay for a solicitor due to low income.

 

In any case, I am pretty confident that it would be just another case of you have to pay it back, and be more careful in the future with regards to sending letters by recorded post.

 

Have you got anyone that can go with you? Just having moral support will probably make you feel better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

told them the date she started permanent

 

 

This appears to be the reason for them calling you in, what you should have said was the date she actually started the job i.e. day one. Whether temp OR permanent.

 

 

You are legally required to make a change of circumstances notification as soon as it is known to the LA/DWP and any others as soon as they occur, especially if the changes will affect the amount of benefit you could receive.

 

 

Failure to do so will/could leave you open to being questioned as in this case. see here >>Link and a good practise guide here >>Link

 

 

The decision that the LA can take is to sanction you, this involves paying a financial penalty, prosecute you, or do nothing but this is unlikely, you will have to repay all of the overpayment in full, plus you could be subject to further checks at a later date to verify the information you have provided is correct and up to date.

 

 

Also please remember that all agencies now cross reference each other and do checks with banks and credit reference agencies. Be aware to tell the truth in this interview as what you say can be used as evidence against you.

 

 

Link 1 explains what an over payment is

 

 

Link 2 explains could can happen

 

 

Each link has a lot of other links in there so you will nee to read them all to give you an idea where you currently stand. They can also let you know what to expect MAY happen

 

 

 

 

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been to see the solicitor basically if I want them to attend going to cost me £300,hes advised me to attend the interview and don't admit to the 6 months previous unless they have evidence of it,they said its up to the benefits to prove they never received my letter.They seem to think they've been in touch with inland and seen the wife's worked before I informed them,so if they want to do me then they can only do me for the work before September unless they can prove they never received my letter.

 

What should go in my favor in the previous case that went to court when yet again they claimed they never received a form from cab when in fact they found it on the day of my court case.

 

Rang the benefits and I now have my interview tomorrow morning,so will just need to keep calm don't get flustered and be honest with them and hope for the best

 

 

I would be very concerned with this advice as if the LA find out that you lied or deliberately withheld information this could come back in the future and bite your well you know what I mean!!

 

 

If you lie under caution the lies will be there for the Court to see if it gets that far. It could be seen as Perverting the Course of Justice

 

 

You could assume the LA have already checked the information with other agencies and already have this information. You can always ask them to disclose what they have before the interview gets started.

 

 

But please be warned about DELIBERATLY telling lies under caution

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...