Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sitting Tenant Issues


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3352 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

My parents live in Stoke Newington in a property which they purchased about 35 yrs ago. At the time of purchase three rooms of the top floor was occupied by a sitting tenant (elderly lady). The tenant passed away about 10yrs after the property was purchased but then the son (who occasionally visited the mother) inherited the tenancy. So now the son lives with his wife in the property. They have lived in the property for the last 15yrs or so. My questions are as follows:

a) Are there any new laws surrounding inherited sitting tenancy - are they still protected to the extent that they cannot be evicted?

b) My parents have tried several times to implement home improvements eg central heating- but they have refused. In fact it was around 5 years ago the wife agreed to have central heating. When the husband returned from work he arranged for the radiators to be removed. The radiators are still on the landing to this day. More recently my parents wanted to have double glazing windows fitted. The son refused to allow the double glazing company to enter his room so as to measure the windows. When asked why he just states that he doesn't want it.

Where do my parents stand legally in all this?

 

Thank you for any advice offered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Google "regulated tenancies", unless they they breach the terms of their tenancy, eviction will be difficult. The fact that the tenants are allowing the property to deteriorate by not allowing access for maintenance and they've removed the radiators could be used, but I would be surprised if a court would give an order under those circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My parents live in Stoke Newington in a property which they purchased about 35 yrs ago. At the time of purchase three rooms of the top floor was occupied by a sitting tenant (elderly lady). The tenant passed away about 10yrs after the property was purchased but then the son (who occasionally visited the mother) inherited the tenancy. So now the son lives with his wife in the property. They have lived in the property for the last 15yrs or so. My questions are as follows:

a) Are there any new laws surrounding inherited sitting tenancy - are they still protected to the extent that they cannot be evicted?

b) My parents have tried several times to implement home improvements eg central heating- but they have refused. In fact it was around 5 years ago the wife agreed to have central heating. When the husband returned from work he arranged for the radiators to be removed. The radiators are still on the landing to this day. More recently my parents wanted to have double glazing windows fitted. The son refused to allow the double glazing company to enter his room so as to measure the windows. When asked why he just states that he doesn't want it.

Where do my parents stand legally in all this?

 

Thank you for any advice offered.

 

Is there any Tenancy agreement ?

 

Succession rights on the death of a Regulated Tenant covered by 1977 Rent act and 1988 Housing act and are binding on a Landlord and there would be No grounds for a possession order IMHO.

 

If the LL wants to implement home improvements, discuss it with them don't just turn up or say they have no choice Tenants could make a claim for harassment against LL.

 

Parents need to or should have consulted Solicitor specializing in Housing Law ...

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response. On both occasions my parents informed them and gave sufficient warning that work would be conducted on the premises. On the first occasion (ie central heating) the wife agreed and allowed work to be conducted. They even agreed to the double glazing to be done but when the workmen arrived the husband refused them entry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response. On both occasions my parents informed them and gave sufficient warning that work would be conducted on the premises. On the first occasion (ie central heating) the wife agreed and allowed work to be conducted. They even agreed to the double glazing to be done but when the workmen arrived the husband refused them entry.

 

Is there any Tenancy agreement !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My parents are very elderly (mother 80 and father 93)- they say that the agreement was with the mother but this was years ago and they are unable to locate it. At the time of the mothers death the son was living in Philippines and rushed over with bride in tow once he learnt of his mothers demise. There is no agreement with the son.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My parents are very elderly (mother 80 and father 93)- they say that the agreement was with the mother but this was years ago and they are unable to locate it. At the time of the mothers death the son was living in Philippines and rushed over with bride in tow once he learnt of his mothers demise. There is no agreement with the son.

 

No TA.

 

Up to the courts to rule on any disputes if any arise and not the LL.

 

If the parents want to carry out improvement works so on, so they can increase the rent.

 

Any rent increase the Tenants will be able to changeling via Residential property tribunal https://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/residential-property

 

If Parents still want to carry improvement work out and so, Parents need to seek advice from Solicitor specializing in Housing Law ....

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My parents live in Stoke Newington in a property which they purchased about 35 yrs ago. At the time of purchase three rooms of the top floor was occupied by a sitting tenant (elderly lady). The tenant passed away about 10yrs after the property was purchased but then the son (who occasionally visited the mother) inherited the tenancy. So now the son lives with his wife in the property. They have lived in the property for the last 15yrs or so. My questions are as follows:

a) Are there any new laws surrounding inherited sitting tenancy - are they still protected to the extent that they cannot be evicted?

b) My parents have tried several times to implement home improvements eg central heating- but they have refused. In fact it was around 5 years ago the wife agreed to have central heating. When the husband returned from work he arranged for the radiators to be removed. The radiators are still on the landing to this day. More recently my parents wanted to have double glazing windows fitted. The son refused to allow the double glazing company to enter his room so as to measure the windows. When asked why he just states that he doesn't want it.

Where do my parents stand legally in all this?

 

Thank you for any advice offered.

 

Just to pick up on something I missed out early on.

 

property which they purchased about 35 yrs ago. At the time of purchase three rooms of the top floor was occupied by a sitting tenant (elderly lady).
So that would be around 1980

 

The tenant passed away about 10yrs after the property was purchased
So that would be around 1990

 

son lives with his wife in the property. They have lived in the property for the last 15yrs or so.
That would be around 2000.

 

Who's been living in the property then between 1990 and 2000 !

 

But

 

At the time of the mothers death the son was living in Philippines and rushed over with bride in tow once he learnt of his mothers demise.

 

So that would be around 1990.

 

Son and wife have been there for 25 years then ?

 

I'm confused !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually- it may even be longer than that. I just confirmed that the house was actually purchased in 1974 and tenant died 20yrs after and son has been there for last 20 yrs- Wow time does fly when your having fun.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually- it may even be longer than that. I just confirmed that the house was actually purchased in 1974 and tenant died 20yrs after and son has been there for last 20 yrs- Wow time does fly when your having fun.:lol:

 

Ok.

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...