Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3442 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I spoke to council about this and they said deal with rossies and that paying them confuses things and I am still liable for rossies costs etc, they also said, re the unlawfull levy that its nothing to do with them?

 

Must be panto season. Just remind the Council they are responsible for the actions & charges of their contractors.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As ploddertom has said, council are 100% liable both jointly and severally for dossers invalid levy, they are giving all the ammunition you need for a Formal complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Morning To CAG

 

'Committal Action'

 

CT Going back 3 year, with a few visits from Rossies men in black, Rossies handed it back due to unable to collect etc.

 

Now the committal letter has arrived. although it is my intention to make an arrangement plan, has anybody defended this intended action ? went to prison? and for how long? did the debt still stand after sentence ?

 

Surely once I/we attend court then the judge would see that I/we have not refused to pay debt but merely Cant, at the moment.

 

Thank you in advance

Regards..Mr Worried :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

To save time going back on old posts can you post back with answers to the following:

 

How much is still due to the local authority?

 

How many Liability Orders are outstanding?

 

When was the last payment made and was this to Ross & Roberts or the local authority?

 

How much have you paid since January?

 

Are you employed?

 

What date is the hearing for committal?

 

Have you made a payment proposal?

 

PS: If you are employed then there is a legal obligation that provides that an Attachment of Earnings should be attempted before committal can be considered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and, to reassure also, commital is the last resort. there wld need to be a hearing pior, and any payment arrangement offer (even if a temp short term one at a lower amount, with review to an increased one later) wld v likely be accepted by the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and, to reassure also, committal is the last resort. there wld need to be a hearing prior, and any payment arrangement (even if a temp short term one at a lower amount, with review to an increased one later) wld v likely be accepted by the court.

 

In fact, in most cases you are correct but if the local authority can demonstrate that no efforts had been made over the past year or so to reduce the debt then committal can indeed proceed on the basis of 'willful' refusal. The court will also be looking to see what income was received and the outgoings. For example, if the court can see that payments had been maintained to credit card providers etc but that no payments had been made to a 'preferential creditor' such as the local authority that would also influence the decision

Link to post
Share on other sites

In fact, in most cases you are correct but if the local authority can demonstrate that no efforts had been made over the past year or so to reduce the debt then committal can indeed proceed on the basis of 'willful' refusal. The court will also be looking to see what income was received and the outgoings. For example, if the court can see that payments had been maintained to credit card providers etc but that no payments had been made to a 'preferential creditor' such as the local authority that would also influence the decision

 

agree. am not familiar with whole thread, thought OP was not a 'willful refuser' eg 'I/we have not refused to pay debt but merely Cant'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...