Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3447 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is my first time posting so I apologise if I get something wrong or miss something out.

 

I was working at Wilkinsons about a year ago and

I was overpayed £120 in holiday pay before I left, I did not know at the time.

 

A few months passed and I received a letter from wilkinsons asking for the amount.

 

I rang them and explained that I had no money and was trying to get my benefits

so I could actually have some money and would then be able to pay them once this was sorted.

 

In september I managed to get my benefits and paid them what I was able to,

which was £30 and would pay some more when I got my next benefit.

 

They said that was fine and assured me that my details would not be passed on to a third party collection agency.

 

My next benefit was sanctioned and I have been fighting with the DWP to get my JSA so I could clear this.

 

Today I received a letter from RLP claiming they were acting on behalf of wilkos and I owe them a total £395.

I have no idea where they have plucked this number from...

 

Is it possible to just pay the original amount in full to the company to who the debt was originally owed?

 

I want nothing to do with RLP and this is sending me sick with worry.

 

Please any help would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to the retail loss prevention forum.

 

 

you owe them nothing TOTALLY ignore them

 

 

read the threds here

 

 

though I must admit this is the first time I've heard the chasing a wages over payments.

 

 

please be assured they have NO LEGAL POWERS WHATSOEVER.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So RLP finds another way to make money out of other people's misfortunes.

 

We may as well find out more about what is going on here. I would suggest that you don't ignore them.

 

Write to them and tell them that you have no idea who they are and you want evidence that they are representing Wilkinson's.

 

Tell them also that you have no idea why they are asking for such a sum of money and that you deny any liability. Tell them that you want a full breakdown of how they arrive at that sum.

 

Tell them that if you have a satisfactory response from them then you may consider what your next step should be.

 

Please come back here when you have the answer. By the way, RLP monitor this forum so don't be surprised if they make some reference to it. Above all, don't be worried. As long as you act honestly and above board then there is nothing to be concerned about.

 

You must also write a letter to Wilkinson's. This is partly because I expect that you have been doing everything on the telephone and you don't record your calls. This is extremely foolish. You should always record your calls whichever company you are talking to. You will never regret it.

 

You need to write to Wilkinson's to set down a paper trail. Refer to your previous conversations with them, remind them that you said XXX – and that they said YYY and that you then said ABCD and they replied EFGH and that finally you agreed MNOPQ. Therefore you are extremely surprised to be told that they have shared your information with a company and that you have now been contacted by a company which purports to be acting on the behalf to collect an alleged debt.

 

Ask them why they have done this.

 

Do not say anything else in your letter. Don't make any admissions or promises. Simply recite the discussions you have had with them and what was agreed. It is very important to get this down on paper somewhere.

 

Come back here when you have any of these answers. In the meantime, start reading up on estoppel. Follow the link under – estoppel – to give yourself a head start

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just spoke to the woman I was originally dealing with and she say's that the issue is now out of her hands and refused to take the original outstanding amount of £90, when I offered to pay it right now in full.

I am now quite afraid of contacting this nest of parasites that are obviously trying to shake loose whatever money they can from vulnerable people.

I could ask them if it's possible to pay only the original amount to them but no doubt they will say no and demand the £395 be payed

This really isn't helping my depression

 

I am very grateful for your help though, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is in your best interest to write to them as I suggested – and also to write to Wilkinson's and to put it all on paper.

 

Wilkinson's are wrong to refuse to accept your money – and when you write to them, confirm also that on such and such a date you offered to repay the money as a gesture of goodwill and they refused. Point out to them that you consider that they have no right to refuse any payments and that they have a duty to mitigate their loss.

 

If this ever goes to court, the judge will be very impressed that you try to pay the money and he will be less than impressed that Wilkinson's have refused to take the money.

 

They are obviously run by children and don't know their way around the street. Maybe they've been advised by RLP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the advice, I will contact them via post in a day or two when I have wrapped my head around this and I am a little less distraught.

At this moment in time though I am sleep deprived, upset and very angry.

Any ideas on what to put in writing would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to be distraught here. You have done nothing wrong. In fact by offering to repay them you have done more than you probably would be required to do if they took you to court.

 

The whole thing is very unfair from your ex-employers – but from RLP and the debt collection industry in general, this kind of stress and pressure is to be expected.

 

Look through my posts carefully and you will see that if you follow the instructions, you will easily manage to write what is necessary. As far as RLP is concerned, the main objective is to make contact with them and show them that you are prepared to be feisty and that you will cause trouble for them if they proceed with this.

 

If you show them that you are already disheartened, then RLP will take comfort and they will continue to press you the payment of this extremely extortionate and unjustified sum of money.

 

Stick with us and let yourself be helped. Get these letters out as quickly as possible. Once you have done them and sent them, you will feel as if you have put yourself in control and you will feel much better. If you allow yourself to go the next couple of days feeling wretched and avoiding the letters, you will just feel worse about it and you will be effectively acting in the way that RLP want you to act

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try something like this to RLP:

 

Dear Sirs

 

I refer to your letter dated xxxx. I do not acknowledge any liability for the sum you claim I owe.

 

You have not provided any detail as to how the amount you are claiming has been arrived at.

 

Unless you provide me with a breakdown of the amount you are claiming, and what your involvement in the matter is, I regret that I am unable to consider your letter further.

 

Yours etc.

 

Don't expect a sensible reply; RLP's correspondence is usually circumloquacious and unhelpful. They are bullies with delusions of authority, and it is best to be aware of this from the start, so you do not take what they say too seriously. We have a good deal of experience in dealing with RLP, and it is best to keep letters to them short and to the point; don't be tempted to go into detail with them.

 

RLP like to sound big and important, but the reality is that they are impotent and the most they can do is send out some letters designed to scare people into sending them money. These are just words on a piece of paper, though - nothing to worry about.

 

It will be interesting to see what they come back with. I won't say yet exactly why, but this could be really important.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW! This is a first for me as I have a particular interest in RLPs practices.

 

Is there any possibility of letting the site team have a copy of this letter. You can remove anything that identifies you.

 

By passing this case to RLP who have added a fictitious amount to it puts RLP into the debt collection business. I am not sure whether they would need a licence to do this :???:

 

This is just my opinion so it may get get kicked out.

 

Wilkinson may have defamed you by passing this to a company that deals with theft. You were never accused of theft. You were overpaid by Wilco's

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definatly unplug your phone. And as others say, RLP cannot take you to court EVER no matter what they say. Last time they tried was in 2012 and it ended badly for them

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definatly unplug your phone. And as others say, RLP cannot take you to court EVER no matter what they say. Last time they tried was in 2012 and it ended badly for them

 

RLP cannot bring court claims themselves, so to be accurate the 2012 case ended badly for the retailer who did bring the case.

 

RLP write a lot of drivel about court claims, but the chances of a retailer issuing a claim is remote.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By passing this case to RLP who have added a fictitious amount to it puts RLP into the debt collection business. I am not sure whether they would need a licence to do this :???:

 

I was also under the impression that RLP would need a credit licence in order to act as a DCA - It might be worth addressing a complaint to the FCA and see what they have to say about the matter.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was also under the impression that RLP would need a credit licence in order to act as a DCA - It might be worth addressing a complaint to the FCA and see what they have to say about the matter.

 

They do. But then again, this is Jackie and co we are talking about. The same people that tried to tell a judge that he was wrong when finding in favour of a defendant.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

But then again, this is Jackie and co we are talking about.

 

My apologies. In my defence, I forgot it was panto season and all the old hacks were worming their way out of the woodwork looking to play their part.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the past, RLP applied to the OFT for a Consumer Credit Licence, but were told they didn't need one, because they don't collect debts. Leaving aside the fact that it shows that RLP's speculative invoices don't create legitimate debts, I don't think that they'd ever sought to recover an overpayment of wages - which is a legitimate debt. Collecting of such a debt is clearly a licenceable activity.

 

That is why I'll be interested to see how RLP reply to the OP. Will they try to dress up debt collection as some sort of faux claim for damages? How will they explain the additional amount they've added on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your support, I am about to send my letter to RLP (probably second class, not worth the money)

I am still unsure of what exactly to put in writing to Wilkos but you are right, they have defamed me and I feel lumped in with thieves and criminals having to deal with RLP.

When I made it clear from the very start I had no intention of retaining the money that was wrongfully paid to me.

 

I just tried to link a picture of the letter I received but it would not let me until I have at least 10 posts...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't start using words like defamation etc. It's a bit wild and far too emotive. Just keep you letter calm, too the point and factual. Short is good. Long is bad

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to be the party pooper but

 

 

I don't think the impression given here a couple of times that OP isn't required to pay these sums

or couldn't be taken to court is correct.

 

 

This isn't one of the alleged shoplifting-type cases where we usually come across RLP.

 

 

The underlying claim here is for recovery of overpayment of wages and OP agrees that happened.

 

 

I'm pretty sure it's established law that if an employer overpays wages in error

they are entitled to recover them and go to court to secure repayment if necessary.

 

 

So to that extent it's not correct to imply that OP wonn't be taken to court,

we don't know how far the employer would be prepared to go.

(Whether Wilinson's subsequent action in refusing the wage repayment when offered has damaged their case procedurally is another matter).

 

 

Whether the additional sums RLP have added to get to £395 can be recovered is a different matter again,

but the wages overpayment itself is surely recoverable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem paying back the money that I owe to my ex employer, which is £90.50.

That money at the end of the day is not mine and I have no right to it.

The retailer would already have their money back by now if they had accepted it yesterday.

An extra £304.50 to RLP is what I have a problem with

Link to post
Share on other sites

HOW TO UPLOAD DOCUMENTS / IMAGES ON CAGi

IMMEDIATELY YOU DO NOT NEED 10 POSTS

.

IMPORTANT To protect your IDENTITY and ensure you remain ANONYMOUS on CAG

YOU MUST ensure that you REMOVE all Personal Information including Barcodes, Names, Addresses etc

.

ENSURE: To leave all Monetary Figures and Dates.

.

DO NOT USE A BIRO, PEN, SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS TO EDIT THE INFORMATION

.

1. SCAN YOUR DOCUMENT

.

- Set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300 DPI (150 will do)

- Scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture (jpg) file

- Don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

.

- If you have multiple scans/pictures please put these into a WORD DOC first ensuring you have removed all Personal Information before converting to PDF.

.

- IPHONE ONLY: Take a picture and Convert to PDF via an APP

.

2. HOW TO EDIT (Remove Personal Information)

.

- Do this using MSPAINT.EXE or any Photo Editing program and ensure to save the document.

.

3. HOW TO CONVERT YOUR DOCUMENT TO PDF

.

- If you have OFFICE installed this has an installable PRINT to PDF option so use this and save as PDF.

- If you have PDF as an installed driver use this program and save as PDF.

.

OR Go to one of the many free online pdf converter websites:

.

- http://freejpgtopdf.com/

- http://www.convert-jpg-to-pdf.net/

- http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

- http://www.pdfmerge.com/

- http://www.primopdf.com/

.

PLEASE REMEMBER: It would be better to upload a Multi-page PDF rather than multiple Single PDFs.

.

4. BEFORE UPLOADING YOUR DOCUMENT ON CAG

.

- Logically Name your PDF File so Users know what it is. DO NOT NAME YOUR FILE USING BANK NAMES OR CAG IN THE TITLE

.

- For Example: Default Notice DDicon-MM-YYYY.

.

IMPORTANT To protect your IDENTITY and ensure you remain ANONYMOUS on CAG please ensure that you do a final check that all Personal Information including Barcodes, Names, Addresses etc. are REMOVED before carrying out the NEXT STEP

.

5. HOW TO UPLOAD YOUR DOCUMENT ON CAG

.

- In your Thread/Post open a new msg box here.

- Click 'Go Advanced' below the msg box.

- Click 'Manage Attachments' below that box.

- Click the 'Add Files' button on the top right.

- Click 'Select Files', navigate to your file(s) on your PC.

- Click 'Upload Files'.

.

- You DON’T have to put a link to the attachment in the msg box just upload it ……… JOB DONE

- You can click on your links to check them too!!

.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to be the party pooper but

 

 

I don't think the impression given here a couple of times that OP isn't required to pay these sums

or couldn't be taken to court is correct.

 

 

This isn't one of the alleged shoplifting-type cases where we usually come across RLP.

 

 

The underlying claim here is for recovery of overpayment of wages and OP agrees that happened.

 

 

I'm pretty sure it's established law that if an employer overpays wages in error

they are entitled to recover them and go to court to secure repayment if necessary.

 

 

So to that extent it's not correct to imply that OP wonn't be taken to court,

we don't know how far the employer would be prepared to go.

(Whether Wilinson's subsequent action in refusing the wage repayment when offered has damaged their case procedurally is another matter).

 

 

Whether the additional sums RLP have added to get to £395 can be recovered is a different matter again,

but the wages overpayment itself is surely recoverable?

 

 

 

 

yes but NOT using RLP.

 

 

something smell s here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...