Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Carer's Allowance and its effect on other benefits


neword
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3516 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Last week my wife's PIP claim appears to have been sorted and according to the woman I spoke to on the phone she has been awarded standard rate for both care and mobility.

 

So we are glad it seems to have been sorted but so far we have not had written confirmation of the award so have put the payment they made aside just in case they say they made a mistake.

 

Anyway, While I was browsing the net I came across Carer's Allowance and that it is a benefit that can be paid as long as you get either rate of PIP care (it also apparently applies to DLA and some other benefits).

 

Now I have taken some time to look into this and I seem to have conflicting information with regards as to the receiving Carer's Allowance (CA) and its effect of other benefits like HB and CT.

 

Now I am is self employment but my earnings after costs are in the region of £90-£95 pw after all costs have been taken into account so according to the rule that I cannot earn more than £102 pw I should qualify for it.

 

It the effect it would have on HB and CT that I am unsure of due to conflicting information and this is where I really would like to get some clarity.

 

So if anyone could shed some light onto this possible effect on HB and CT it would be appreciated.

 

FYI: Earning after costs of £92.50 (average), Receive WTC, CT, CB and now PIP standard for both care and mobility.

We live in adapted social housing (Tenants Association) underoccupied 2 spare bedrooms

Have no savings worth mentioning (£150)

 

If someone could just try to clarify the HB and CT effects as even my landlord if iffy with information.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and just thought

 

I do not want to claim this carer's allowance if at the end of the week all I have done is made work for

myself and not actually gained from it. I mean what would be the point

 

Likewise if any award for carers left me with less than £10 more per week I do not think that claiming

it given my situation would be worth it either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

#estellyn#

 

My wife does not claim esa and never has. I was on JSA for a long time and

she was included in my claim.

 

It's only in the last three months that I have gone self employed.

 

Current amount awarded for HB is full - 25% for bedroom tax

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have a full award and no income based esa or jsa, it is difficult to tell how much better off you will be - a maximum of whatever carer's allowance is, and a minimum of about £40 a week. Basically look on your housing benefit award and see what the difference is between the net income they take into account and the applicable amount and if your net income is less than your applicable amount by £61 or more then your award would stay the same.

 

How many hours do you work?

Edited by estellyn
didn't make sense

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually put in about 32 hours per week and I know whet your thinking HOW.

 

I have always risen early all my life and I am normally working by 4:00am

so can put in 3 hours per day before I get my wife's breakfast ready.

She then takes a nap about 2 hours in the afternoon during which I do my self employment again.

so I average about 30-35 hours a well because I also work weekend.

 

SO I actually do my se in the times when she does not need me.

During the time when she is awake I am always there for her and my se is put aside.

 

There are high costs involved in what I do so the profit is reasonably low. I love what I do

so the reward (profit) is sort of a extra.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no income from Se but JSA, CB, CTC, HB, DLA (high mob) for 13/14 (till 17th February)

 

14/15 is a little messy as from April 5 - May 8th we had JSA, CB, CTC, HB, CT but no DLA as it had been stopped (17th February)

then from 8th May - 19th September we had SE, WTC, CTC, CT, CB. HB, but no DLA

and from 20th Sept on we had SE, WTC, CTC, CB, HB and PIP Standard for care and Mob.

 

Like I said messy

 

So this is probably going to take some sorting before we can get a rough figure.

 

Will give WTC people a call to clarify that.

Will also call the housing association as well to clarify it's effect on HB, CT as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no income from Se but JSA, CB, CTC, HB, DLA (high mob) for 13/14 (till 17th February)

 

14/15 is a little messy as from April 5 - May 8th we had JSA, CB, CTC, HB, CT but no DLA as it had been stopped (17th February)

then from 8th May - 19th September we had SE, WTC, CTC, CT, CB. HB, but no DLA

and from 20th Sept on we had SE, WTC, CTC, CB, HB and PIP Standard for care and Mob.

 

Like I said messy

 

So this is probably going to take some sorting before we can get a rough figure.

 

Will give WTC people a call to clarify that.

Will also call the housing association as well to clarify it's effect on HB, CT as well.

 

Tax credit want to know your taxable income.

 

So for 2014/15 this would only be you SE income and if you get carers allowance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Didn't want to start a new thread/post so have just added this little question onto this (it's relevant)

 

Approximately 3 weeks ago we found a payment for PIP in my wifes bank account but we have not as

yet received any official letter of the award. I have phoned the DWP concerning this on 5 different occasions and have asked

for a call back as well. The 5 day deadline for the call back came and went last Friday.

Whenever I phone the person the other end justs says there's nothing on the system concerning the award...whatever...

 

Now whats is bothering me the most is that if I want to get a reconsideration of the award (my wife used to get DLA High Mob

but they only gave her standard PIP Mob) which has a time limit (30days? not sure). Will this time be from the date of the award or from

the date of the notification letter?

 

We have no back payment information either when we call them because they state the award has not been put onto the system yet.

 

SO they can make any award and get the payments onto the system but they cannot get the actual notification information sent out.

This is one weird system that really needs it's conkers squeezing to get it to work right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...