Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letting Agent not protected tenants deposits (M&W Lettings)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3423 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have had lots of issues with them.

 

Just discovered can't private message on here until you have 30 posts and can't post links until 10 posts.

 

Please email me at [removed]

 

I know you can private message there. I want to ensure you have some info that will be of use to you.

Edited by honeybee13
Asking for contact off forum.
Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the secret? can we all not be informed if you have useful info.

 

It's sensitive, do not want it public knowledge as it is helpful whilst not out completely in the public for landlords and tenants who are at risk of losing a lot of money through this agent. Happy to share with anyone who is currently going through a nightmare with M & W if they want to email me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Raydetinu is quite right, we don't encourage contact off forum.

 

OP, please think carefully before you share information with someone who is just a name on the interweb. Advice that is given on open forum can be peer-reviewed and any problems spotted.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears RL has an axe to grind, as is posting disparaging remarks about M&W all over the place!

 

Simply trying to get money back from them before it disappears, and I am not alone in this. I will say this, they are no longer registered with My Deposits, so anything they historically held with them is safe until mid October. Anything they have taken since 25th July is unsecured.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they stakeholders for the deposits then! and just registered with My deposits?

You say YOU are trying to get it back from them.

If you are a LL then has the scheme reimbursed tenants and then you are actually trying to get the deposit back from Agent ( you could of protected it yourself of course ).

Have you started any court action?

Have you tried posting on the Landlordzone web site for advice?

LL that have used agent that has not protected deposit face sanctions as well, as it is the LL responsibility to protect.

 

 

This is probably worth another thread on its own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stumbled across this thread because I was looking for reviews of M&W lettings.

 

So the history of this thread started with them taking a deposit from a tenant and when the landlord chased for the deposit certificate, found out they were not registered and registered 3 months after they'd taken monies.

 

When I let my property out through them, they were indeed registered, but I just took this as a given and obviously had this confirmed when I received a certificate from My Deposits.

 

I received a letter from My Deposits early August notifying that M & W lettings were no longer a member. On challenging them they said that it was an oversight and they were registering, which to be fair, they did. However, their membership renewal was declined.

 

So as it stands right now, any deposits they have taken from the 15th July 2014 are unsecured.

 

They obviously have the option to go to another scheme, however, as I understand it,

 

Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS) - agents have to belong to a regulated body or have 5 years worth of accounts. Can anyone verify this?

 

They have neither.

 

Deposit Protection Service, offer two types of cover. First one you have to meet the criteria as per above, which they don't. The second service is Custodial, where the whole amount is held totally by the scheme and the agent doesn't get to touch it. Again, would welcome verification of this.

 

So looking at the houses they have let recently, as the rental on them, there are many thousands of pounds of tenants money sitting somewhere, unprotected. And the landlords will not know unless they are clued up to the fact that they should receive a certificate. I know for fact that up until a week ago, their tenancy agreement was still quoting that deposits would be secured with My Deposits.

 

I really have had my eyes open to the fact that it seems anyone can set up a residential lettings agency, take money from people, say it's being secured when it isn't and it seems there is not a lot that can be done about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware my deposits is purely an insurance backed scheme, they do not hold any of the Tenants deposits, the LL retains it or a registered agent as a stakeholder in a non interest account.

The onus is on the LL and the law requires the LL to protect the tenants deposit ( if Agent does this on their behalf, the LL must ensure this is done ).

The LL remains responsible for the protection and if not done can be sued by the tenant. ( leaving it to the agent is NO excuse ).

Its the tenants money which the LL must look after, hence LL is in firing line for it and for the fact it was not done. ( compensation )

I understand Agents are going to be regulated when the government get around to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I've come to learn, the deposit insurance only covers the tenant and I am liable if the agent does a bunk. I have lost confidence in the agent and formally requested the deposit been transferred to me so I could secure it. They have point blankly refused. I am worried sick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they have not protected it then your only course is to end any contract you have with them ( breach of contract ) and sue for the deposit to be either given to you as LL or returned to the tenant.

Have you written to them in this regard? and suggested court action to recover money.

Have you advised tenant of the situation or are they aware of it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We ended our relationship with them this week.

 

I formally requested the deposit be made over to us to secure directly.

 

My intention was to use the Custodial service offered by DPS, I like that they hold it, so it's transparent and no need for anyone to worry the money has actually been used for tickets to Barbados.

 

They have refused. It is now an open case with Action Fraud, but of course there is still the issue of if they do take off with the money but going bust, closing down business and disappearing, although Fraud are now looking at it, I guess I am still liable for these monies?

 

Would there be an objection for me to opening a new thread on this agency and copying these posts over? The local newspaper forum has been getting a lot of experiences of both worried landlords and tenants having to take expensive legal action to get their money back from this group. I believe it to be in the local area public interest.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Already moved posts so you have your own specific thread now.

 

The thread title is the same except for the addition of (M+W Lettings)

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thank you. Could you change it to M&W as that is what they use. I will post the link on the local paper reviews board and get people over here. They have lots of people anxious about their money, but the paper site allows someone to hit the Report button, which removes posts to be looked at. I will post this link to move people here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Done changed to M&W :thumb:

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner and I had to move into rented accomodation after being flooded on christmas eve. M&W found us a flat and said they could arrange a 6 month AST. They charged us £500 plus vat in fees, and took a deposit of £2285, which all seemed reasonable and above board.

 

It later transpired that the flat was a holiday let, there was no AST, they had just booked us in for 4 months. The landlord knew nothing about the deposit (their standard deposit was only £200), and M&W were taking more than the agreed amount from each months rent, leading to the landlord trying to evict us. After talking directly to the landlord (who was fantasticly helpful and understanding) it turned out that M&W had been lying to both parties, and blaming both for the whole situation.

 

The landlord requested that M&W return our deposit, as did we, but M&W refused, and then stopped responding altogether - not answering the phone, refusing delivery of recorded post. Now we find out that they've lost/cancelled their membership of mydeposits! I guess our only recourse now is the small claims court.

Edited by bentilley
spelling!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry tale and my sympathies.

Yes start court proceedings immediately, and send them a letter before action just to be safe. I would also inform the police as there appears to be fraud involved and Trading Standards as they should investigate these people too.

What I don't understand though is handing over a large deposit without a signed contract from the LL??? Agent is just that an Agent?

I hope you have proof of payment of the sum to the agent, then it should be straight forward to get an award, but collecting it is another thing.

From what I understand any deposit registered with my deposits is still covered for three months from the date of any removal or cancellation of an agents membership; so maybe worth contacting them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing on their website! Distinctly dodgy!

This could be the owner or director;

Domain name:

mandwresidentiallettings.co.uk

 

Registrant:

Lucy Sly

 

Registrant type:

Unknown

 

Registrant's address:

[removed]

 

 

Executive

MR JON CLEMENTS was Lucy Sly.

only 3 registerd employees.

 

 

registered address

36 COMMERCIAL ROAD, PADDOCK WOOD

TONBRIDGE

KENT

TN12 6EL

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner and I had to move into rented accomodation after being flooded on christmas eve. M&W found us a flat and said they could arrange a 6 month AST. They charged us £500 plus vat in fees, and took a deposit of £2285, which all seemed reasonable and above board.

 

It later transpired that the flat was a holiday let, there was no AST, they had just booked us in for 4 months. The landlord knew nothing about the deposit (their standard deposit was only £200), and M&W were taking more than the agreed amount from each months rent, leading to the landlord trying to evict us. After talking directly to the landlord (who was fantasticly helpful and understanding) it turned out that M&W had been lying to both parties, and blaming both for the whole situation.

 

The landlord requested that M&W return our deposit, as did we, but M&W refused, and then stopped responding altogether - not answering the phone, refusing delivery of recorded post. Now we find out that they've lost/cancelled their membership of mydeposits! I guess our only recourse now is the small claims court.

 

Bentilly, please go to Action Fraud, phone 0300 123 2040. They are collecting this type of information. Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are not regulated. Unfortunately, all of us in this situation were caught on the hop due to the flooding in the area. So none of us, either owners of properties standing empty who were suddenly offered homeless tenants, or homeless people, did our correct checks and due dilligence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With reference to the reported owner and questions of membership / association - Apparently she may have passed an exam a few years back but is not a registered member of the Association so any claims to that effect would be false

Edited by Javert
wanted to include the original quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3423 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...