Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's better to keep advice on the open forum for everyone's benefit. Maybe you could post up the correspondence in a single pdf document and cover up your personal details, reference numbers and so on? HB
    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.    Thank you for your time and help.  It is really appreciated.  I am quite honestly on the floor, I have been really ill, in hospital, had nearly 6 months off work and only been back full time a few weeks and now this.  The fact the company you pay large sums of money to look after you in a time of need is also behaving criminally just makes you want to give up.    
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

One call & Judgement Order Listings - Court Order Notification


Rob Scrimper
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3545 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

May I ask has anyone ever been experienced that Judgement Order Listings has issued court proceedings against you?

 

My case with them is as follows:

- I had paid up the whole year of car insurance (no claim and no cancellation)

- when I moved home, I changed my address online with their website

- I was charged £40 or so on my credit card without any invoice or notification

- I told my credit card company I did not authorize the payment and they used the old credits card number (which was changed after bought the insurance)

- credit card company refunded me

- One Call Insurance requested £40 and when I refused to pay they cancelled my insurance

- then a few months later, One Call kept asking for the £40

- then they passed it to Judgement who is now asking for the money

- I have just received the "Court Action Notification" asking for £130 or so

 

Not sure if this is worth fighting for, and whether they would actually go to court. I don't have time to play game with Judgement who is full-time chasing people for money.

 

I think I have a case: as they charged me without any notification and they cancelled the insurance about one or two month before the 12 month term.

 

Any advice? Any similar experience?

 

Thanks,

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically its all fake and goes nowhere

 

just type in

onecall in our search of the top grey toolbar.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, dx.

 

Although I think they are using scare tactic to extract as much money as they can from people, I also think I have no time if it ever has gone to court.

 

I worry I have to take a day off to present my case, and time to prepare for it.

What if eventually the court still awards them and I have to pay up...

 

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dreadful company who cannot be compliant with FCA rules and may be in breach of the administration of justice act section 40. They really cannot use Judge Order Listings and make it out that they have gone to court. It is an abuse and should be brought to the attention of the Ministry of Justice (MOJ).

 

Companies do charge admin fees for change of address and this will be noted in your policy documents. You should have been able to access revised documents online or they should have sent confirmation of the change of address. In the event of non payment of any premium adjustments for such things as a change of address, companies can cancel policies.

 

Suggest that you make a complaint and pass on to the FOS if necessary. You could also make a complaint to the MOJ about this companies dodgy documents. Perhaps you could send a copy to your local MP and ask them to bring this to the attention of the MOJ, that this company appears to be deliberately breaching the law by advising of court actions that don't exist.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

your exact letter will be in the threads about onecall already listed here

 

pers i'd simply ignore them.

 

if you care to look

 

you'll see the old justice scales logo and letterhead has now gone

 

to a rather less scary logo.

 

by all means complain, but all you have simply is a threat-o-gram.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks unclebulgaria67.

 

I did recognize that admin fee may be charged. But I was not happy that they just took the money from my credit card without my authorization.

 

When One Call cancelled my insurance, I considered it "even."

 

Moreover, I consider that even if the fee was specified in the policy document but it should not mean I have to accept it. At the time when it happened (a change of address), they can ask for money according to the policy, and I can refuse. Then the policy is cancelled. I do not consider they can "enforce" the fee being paid up.

 

Does it stand legally?

 

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks unclebulgaria67.

 

I did recognize that admin fee may be charged. But I was not happy that they just took the money from my credit card without my authorization.

 

When One Call cancelled my insurance, I considered it "even."

 

Moreover, I consider that even if the fee was specified in the policy document but it should not mean I have to accept it. At the time when it happened (a change of address), they can ask for money according to the policy, and I can refuse. Then the policy is cancelled. I do not consider they can "enforce" the fee being paid up.

 

Does it stand legally?

 

R

 

When you took out the Insurance you accepted the contract terms. They can charge the admin fee, but should advise you before they put the payment through. If there was a change to the premium rates because of the new address, they would also confirm that before this is charged.

 

So admin fee correct, but the process appears to be wrong in not communicating with you about processing the payment.

 

All Insurance companies charge admin fees for policy amendment these days.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

but they are a penalty fee and unlawful regardless to if they are in any silly t&C's.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I accept your points.

 

Does it mean Judgement has a case and will prevail if they decide to go to court against me?

 

R

 

When you took out the Insurance you accepted the contract terms. They can charge the admin fee, but should advise you before they put the payment through. If there was a change to the premium rates because of the new address, they would also confirm that before this is charged.

 

So admin fee correct, but the process appears to be wrong in not communicating with you about processing the payment.

 

All Insurance companies charge admin fees for policy amendment these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but they are a penalty fee and unlawful regardless to if they are in any silly t&C's.

 

dx

 

 

I agree disproportionate " admin fees" are penalties and are unjustifiable, the insurance industry plays evilly on the fact that compulsory insurance make cash cows of all of us!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

but they are a penalty fee and unlawful regardless to if they are in any silly t&C's.

 

dx

 

Hi dx,

 

Can you explain? I do not understand.

 

The key questions for me is that (1) will Judgement really go to court; and (2) if so, do they have a case?

 

FYI: when I changed address, there were no additional premium to pay.

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

I accept your points.

 

Does it mean Judgement has a case and will prevail if they decide to go to court against me?

 

R

 

They can charge the admin fee and you by not paying this have breached the contract. But I suspect that OneCall breached the contract as well by not informing you that they were going to charge the amount to your account.

 

They won't go to court, as it is not worth it.

 

These fees are not unlawful, as they don't represent a penalty or a profit to the Insurers. If Onecall were asked to justify the admin fee, they could do so, by putting together a list of costs they incurred. IT system, staff costs etc. I suspect that they have this information available on request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

but none of the banks or DCa's ever do

so neither would an ins co.

sighting it being confidential info

just like as what happened with the bank charges debacle.

 

if it were any other co bar onecall [who we think own JoL anyway]

 

then i'd worry

 

but not this lot..

 

it'll never go anywhere.

 

as long as your CRa file is clear

 

then i'd be ignoring them.

 

you start writing

 

and entering letter tennis

then they'll think they have found a mug

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can charge the admin fee and you by not paying this have breached the contract. But I suspect that OneCall breached the contract as well by not informing you that they were going to charge the amount to your account.

 

They won't go to court, as it is not worth it.

 

These fees are not unlawful,****** as they don't represent a penalty or a profit to the Insurers. ****** If Onecall were asked to justify the admin fee, they could do so, by putting together

 

 

a list of costs they incurred. IT system, staff costs etc. I suspect that they have this information available on request.

 

 

 

 

 

****** I seriously doubt that an insurer does not make a profit out of disproportionate charges, they have been " at it" for years.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

****** I seriously doubt that an insurer does not make a profit out of disproportionate charges, they have been " at it" for years.

 

I don't like these admin fees either, but Insurers been justifying them for years. The FOS have so far also agreed to the Insurers applying these charges. No court case challenging them as far as I know.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi there

 

i was with one call insurance i was quoted on line £248 + £30 deposit for yearly car insurance , paid deposit

 

 

then noticed that i was paying £34 per month for insurance

i changed car and called them to ask for quote

 

 

they said i would be additional £400

 

 

i told them to forget it

 

 

i had been with them for 5 months and had paid £170 so far + £30 deposit o £200 in total

 

 

they wanted £56 cancellation fee and i thought no way.

 

 

when i went on their site as new customer the insurance was only £300 for new car.

 

 

i cancelled dd as no way where they getting anymore cash from me

 

 

i now ave letter from them headed "court bailiffs limited" saying i owe £146.04 if not paid further action will be taken.

 

 

oh and if i pay within seven days interest and further £27.00 charge will be lifted .

 

 

they are robbing me blind considering i thought it was cheap insurance quote .

 

 

is this real bailiffs letter or them chancing their arm ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there

i was with one call insurance i was quoted on line £248 + £30 deposit for yearly car insurance , paid deposit the noticed that i was paying £34 per month for insurance i changed car and called them to ask for quote the said i would be additional £400 so i told them to forget it i had been with them for 5 months and had paid £170 so far + £30 deposit so £200 in total they wanted £56 cancellation fee and i thought no way. when i went on their site as new customer the insurance was only £300 for new car. anyway i cancelled dd as no way where they getting anymore cash from me i now ave letter from them headed "court bailiffs limited" saying i owe £146.04 if not paid further action will be taken. oh and if i pay within seven days interest and further £27.00 charge will be lifted . they are robbing me blind considering i thought it was cheap insurance quote . is this real bailiffs letter or them chancing their arm ?

 

No it is made up rubbish. There is no court or bailiff involvement.

 

What this company are doing looks to be illegal. They are not allowed to suggest any court involvement, as that is illegal per section 40 of the Administration of justice act.

 

At some stage in my opinion, One Call will end up being fined a huge amount of money for what they are doing. No serious company would act in this way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you scan up the letter please

 

 

if it implies things it should not

 

 

the FCA will want a copy

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...