Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

joint CiTi debt - my claim stayed, OH got default CCJ - didn't file defence - help


imola186
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3543 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

2 threads merged for history

 

 

please keep to one thread

for all issues regarding these claims

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aha, I didn't realise there was another thread from a while back.. sorry about that dx :(

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well obviously the payment from your wife does not include any contribution from yourself..she is your ex wife.I assume her judgment was payment by forthwith..did she make application using the N245 to vary to monthly?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the quick replies.

 

 

Yes it is a joint account and two separate claims were issued.

 

 

When my ex went to court the judge said the judgement to be issued in her name only and not mine as it is to remain stayed.

 

 

She asked about arranging to pay and the judge said to deal with the company direct.

 

 

I am paying half by giving my ex half the money so we both pay.

 

 

I will be in a position to fully clear the balance in Feb 2016 but that is still a way off unfortunately.

 

 

Even though I am paying half I didn't want them to use that as a reason to try and lift the stay if that makes sense.

 

 

I am sort of hoping that as long as they are being paid they will leave things as they are.

 

 

How easy is it to get a stay lifted if they apply.

 

 

By the way with this account we never had any default notices etc issued from citi bank.

 

 

I've noticed a lot about dca and cca requests being submitted.

 

 

Would it be worth me doing that just in case it goes wrong for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you are divorced the law treats the matter as though you have died

you cannot be asked to make a contribution to someone else's debts nor can your finances be taken into account.

 

 

The company can chance their arm by trying to remove the stay but they will probably then fall foul of the SB date

and you can also challenge the phantom payment.

 

 

If that does indeed prove to be false then a complaint can be made of fraud and your ex may then sue for her money back.

 

 

However, they arent likely to go down that road as they have someone paying them

but are hoping you are good enough to pay them if your ex decides to file for bankruptcy or the like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks again.

God the range of emotions you go through is unbelievable.

Ive been from despair to mega angry.

 

 

I am convinced this has been paid off and I am really annoyed that I am paying for something which has already been paid !!!!.

 

 

However due to the situation I will carry on paying until I can prove otherwise.

 

 

Do you think its worth me sending a SAR request to CITI.

 

 

Also is it a legal requirement for them to have issued default notices before they can take any action.

 

 

we had recieved no default notices and

the letters saying Arrow had taken the persumed debt on

came as a complete surprise.

 

 

Having read a number of threads on here

the creditors and DCAs seem to make up rules as they go along.

 

 

Is there a thread with a logical order of how things should progress.

 

 

ie loan defaulted - default notice issued - etc etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you should have recieved a df notice and a rememedy date did you get this from the OC?

 

Also please be aware of the changes in bailiff laws in 06/04/2014 where if you default a payment the fees are huge so do not miss any payments to save getting a bailiff involved as it will add to your debt

 

SAR and CCA the OC soon and get that information back and update youtr thread please.

 

You also state that you think the debt was cleared earlier then i would also be chasing this informtion up urgently as well

 

The CCA should give you at the least a copy of the agreement not the appilication + all terms and conditions at the start during and at the end of the agreement.

 

The SAR will cover everything else.

 

May I ask if you did a debt consolidation loan as well

 

Also have you been getting annual statements of account from the OC/DCA?

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks again for the reply.

 

 

No I didn't receive any default notices from the OC.

 

 

The last statement received was on the 23 June 2008.

I've received none from the DCA.

This statement was supplied by the DCA when I queried it saying I thought it had been settled.

 

 

This statement shows the last payment of 01/05/2008.

 

 

In their letters they said the final payment was made on the 01/07/2008 and again a random payment in 2009.

 

 

They cannot supply any details of those payments which I find strange if they said the payments were made

and they are not represented in the outstanding figure.

 

 

Along with the statement they provided an insurance application form

a pre contract information form and

a fixed sum loan agreement showing the figures and detailing default charges etc.

 

 

I asked for details of what bank the DD payments were made from

so I can start my investigation to see if that shows the loan being settled.

They can't supply that information.

 

 

The problem is I've got no paperwork showing the loan being settled.

 

 

In the past when things have been paid off I've kept paperwork for a year then I've got rid of it.

 

 

I know know to keep it for at least 6.

 

 

I suppose the only redress would be if the OC and the DCA have not followed the rules correctly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...