Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/mortimer claimform - +15 yr old HSBC Credit Card 'debt' - ** CLAIM DISCONTINUED **


saintorsinner
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yep but don't miss the date

 

 

time to read a few threads e thinks...

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been reading all the threads of defence and many of them end up with the DCA winning

 

considering I have been paying till 2013 when their bank account closed . I have been paying £10 since 2000 .

 

Would i without pred offer help the proceedings?

 

It just sticks in my throat I have tried to do the right thing , they close the account not me to which I have been paying and as a result some shark then picks up the spoils

 

If I went for a tomblin order what additional costs will be added before I get to that stage ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless they comply with your s78 request s78(6) prevents the granting of a ccj

 

It is statutory the court has no discretion

 

In your defence you would also be putting them to strict proof as to how you entered the agreement

 

Read some of the legal success threads

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

would my defence state that , at no time did HSBC contact me in the 12 years plus with a statement,

 

HSBC when their closed their account to which i was paying into, at no time did i receive any letters or demands saying i was behind with my payments

 

surely if they close the account they were paying into its upto them to contact me with new payment details, as I haven't been informed

Link to post
Share on other sites

charges might play a part if it ever went down the mediation route

 

 

however their main hurdle is the signed agreement.

 

 

await that CCA return or not!

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-DCA-Legal-Successes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so smoogie and saints are the same user obv then>

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

usernames merged to the saints one.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for that.

 

Its a waiting game now,

 

 

I have been reading up and I think I may be able to counter sue on the basis of breach of contract.

 

HSBC failed to inform me of the change in payment details and as a result I was unaware a debt was liable

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd see what happens first with the magic-up paperwork genie first

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a question ,

 

 

I take it they have 7 days to comply with my request,

what happens if I don't receive a reply back from them till after the 7 days or ,

that they respond pretty close to the time frame.

 

If they do just produce a auto generated credit agreement what am i looking for in their response that would allow me to defend my claim.

 

If memory serves me well it was a student credit card and was issued as part of the opening of the current account i think

Link to post
Share on other sites

you file on-time regardless

forget the letter timescales.

 

 

if they supply a complicate CCA we can deal with that

simply scan the stuff up they sent we'll look at it.

 

 

if not the holding/no paperwork defence

on many threads here

 

 

Tuesday 19th by 4pm is your cutoff for defence filing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been doing some reading on a defence , and it looks like I have a very strong case for a counter claim on the grounds of breach of contract.

 

 

the judge if it did go to a hearing , wont be impressed that nobody contacted me from HSBC to inform me of their new payment details, furthermore to sell the debt without making any reasonable attempts to contact would be classed as a material breach?. This has even more of a strong case when payments have been made for 13 years with zero contact from hsbc , no statements no letters no nothing

I also can argue that they haven't followed the pre action protcols as they have filed far to early and the orginal letter before claim . was not clear

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is the responsibility of the bank to update the customer on how to pay this debt, therefore by closing the account and not informing me it is a material breach of contract and a rather major one at that , furthermore it is not my responsibility to read my statements to find this out. it is their problem not mine. Therefore I was not aware that the debt existed and therefore needed to be paid in full as it is now.

 

On the basis I breached first, since they have not taken an legal redress . Untill 14 years later you could agure that have accepted the new terms and conditions I have entered into ,ie the new payment arrangement

Link to post
Share on other sites

I ask for the costs to bring the bring the account back to where it was prior to the commencement of legal proceedings. A judge will not accept damages , but will accept modest agreement.

 

 

I will then go down the mediation route if an enforceable CCA was in play and ask for the £35 a time charges on this account to be taken into consideration. which would be at least the same value of the debt at least.

 

 

But again , my defence is fairly fluid until they provide a CCA and a consuus of advice is given from the esteemed group on here. At the moment these are options I am openly discussing in the forum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who've you been paying money to for all these years and has it been deducted from the balance. I would have done a SAR to original bank to get all the info. If you plan on counterclaiming for charges, although risky I beleive you will have to add the original bank as a part 20 defendant. Here's a copy of a reply I gave to someone else regarding counterclaim + Andys response: I think I would be concentrating on getting the claim dismissed first (no cca is a very strong case) and then look into the charges as a separate issue against the OC.

 

For the counterclaim I think, but could be wrong, that you have to add the OC as a defendant to the proceedings as only the benefit and not the burden can be assigned. To transfer the burden of a contract as well as the benefits under it, you have to novate. Like assignment, novation transfers the benefits under a contract but unlike assignment, novation transfers the burden under a contract as well.
Correct panther...but ideally it should not really have been made against the claimant but against Santy as a separate action.

 

Novation is only possible with the consent of the original contracting parties as well as the new party. Consideration (the 'price' paid, whether financial or otherwise, by the new party in return for the contract being novated to it) must be provided for this new contract unless the novation is documented in a deed signed by all three parties.

 

Legal and equitable assignment

 

The Law of Property Act creates the ability to legally assign a debt or any other chose in action where the debtor, trustee or other relevant person is notified in writing. If the assignment complied with the formalities in the Act it is a legal assignment, otherwise it will be an equitable assignment.

Some transfers can only take effect as an equitable assignment, for example:

an oral assignment;

an assignment by way of charge;

an assignment of only part of the chosen in action;

an assignment of which notice has not been given to the debtor;

an agreement to assign.

 

Regards

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes HSBC and if am honest I think the amount is wrong , I thought I owed £1900 is I have paid £1500 as for 5 years I paid double

 

Has it come off the balance , i haven't clue as I haven't had any statements since the default in 2000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Updated.... Received a letter yesterday

 

Further to your letter dated 27th april, we are taking our clients instructions in relation to your request and will come back to you as soon as we can

 

we confirm our client is willing to to agree to the extension os 28 days for you to file your defence/ pursuant to cpr 15.5 (2) please notify the court in writing of the agreement

 

so from my understanding I must agree to this?

 

or do I file my defence as planned

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...